search for: 3649615c

...as stated in the license. I'm not going to weigh in on whether (or not) the binary is being distributed in your case, check with a lawyer. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130313/3649615c/attachment.html>

On Mar 13, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Moritz Maxeiner <moritzmaxeiner at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If I write LLVM bindings for a language X, in which I obviously > need to at least use parts of the llvm-c headers (constants, enums, typedefs, function names and > signatures) do I need to include the LLVM copyright notice? > > Whereas llvm-c has multiple headers (e.g.

On 03/13/2013 07:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > LLVM's license includes a binary redistribution clause: > http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license Hi Chris, the problem with the binary redistribution clause is that the bindings will not be linked with any part of LLVM. The bindings will load an LLVM shared library (dll/so/dylib) at runtime and thus an application compiled