Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "34792".
Did you mean:
32792
2017 Oct 26
2
[lld] Flavour option purpose
...u"
> or "lld -flavor link".
>
> -flavor seems to be still actively used in Clang… By the the way, there
> seems to be no special
> command name for Darwin targets, so ld.lld (incorrectly) invokes the ELF
> linker there
> (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34792#c1)
>
> Regardless, I would be interested in hearing the answer to the rest of the
> questions.
>
> > On 26 Oct 2017, at 23:10, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > The -flavor option exists mostly for historical reasons. I think using
> ld.lld or ll...
2017 Oct 26
1
[lld] Flavour option purpose
...u"
> or "lld -flavor link".
>
> -flavor seems to be still actively used in Clang… By the the way, there
> seems to be no special
> command name for Darwin targets, so ld.lld (incorrectly) invokes the ELF
> linker there
> (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34792#c1)
>
> Regardless, I would be interested in hearing the answer to the rest of the
> questions.
>
> > On 26 Oct 2017, at 23:10, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > The -flavor option exists mostly for historical reasons. I think using
> ld.lld or ll...
2017 Nov 01
2
[lld] Flavour option purpose
..." or "lld -flavor link".
>>
>> -flavor seems to be still actively used in Clang… By the the way, there seems to be no special
>> command name for Darwin targets, so ld.lld (incorrectly) invokes the ELF linker there
>> (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34792#c1)
>>
>> Regardless, I would be interested in hearing the answer to the rest of the questions.
>>
>>> On 26 Oct 2017, at 23:10, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The -flavor option exists mostly for historical reasons. I think using l...
2017 Oct 26
4
[lld] Flavour option purpose
Hi all,
According to lld/docs/Driver.rst, Flavor command line option determines the style of lld command-line interface when invoked.
However, it looks like this option also determines the set of supported targets we are linking for. For example, lld -flavor gnu
cannot link mach-o binaries, and could not link PE binaries either (well, not until rL312926).
Is this really intended by the design
2017 Nov 01
2
[lld] Flavour option purpose
...gt;>>
> >>> -flavor seems to be still actively used in Clang… By the the way,
> there seems to be no special
> >>> command name for Darwin targets, so ld.lld (incorrectly) invokes the
> ELF linker there
> >>> (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34792#c1)
> >>>
> >>> Regardless, I would be interested in hearing the answer to the rest of
> the questions.
> >>>
> >>>> On 26 Oct 2017, at 23:10, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The -flavor o...
2013 Sep 12
1
How to get call progress events from WebSocket connected to Asterisk 12 ARI events API
...console.log('received: %s', message);
});
ws.on('error', function(err) {
console.log(err);
});
It runs and indicates a successful connection:
$ node app.js
connected
The Asterisk CLI logs the successful connection:
== WebSocket connection from '192.168.1.125:34792' for protocol 'ari'
accepted using version '13'
Creating Stasis app 'node-client'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130912/d4814ddb/attachment.htm>
2017 Nov 14
2
[lld] Flavour option purpose
...; > >>> -flavor seems to be still actively used in Clang… By the the way,
> there seems to be no special
> > >>> command name for Darwin targets, so ld.lld (incorrectly) invokes the
> ELF linker there
> > >>> (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34792#c1)
> > >>>
> > >>> Regardless, I would be interested in hearing the answer to the rest
> of the questions.
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 26 Oct 2017, at 23:10, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> >...
2017 Nov 16
2
[lld] Flavour option purpose
...;>> -flavor seems to be still actively used in Clang… By the the way,
> there seems to be no special
> > > >>> command name for Darwin targets, so ld.lld (incorrectly) invokes
> the ELF linker there
> > > >>> (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34792#c1)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regardless, I would be interested in hearing the answer to the
> rest of the questions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On 26 Oct 2017, at 23:10, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
> > > &g...
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Unexpected behaviour
...oes to the D-link) the same flipflop state occurs.
If it helps, here is the relevant ifconfig:
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:47:DF:7A:61
inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fedf:7a61/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:34792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:2778388 (2.6 MiB) TX bytes:378 (378.0 b)
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:47:DF:7A:7F
inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fed...
2005 Apr 26
3
Error using e1071 svm: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call
...23275, 24132, 24592, 25057, 28456, 32484,
32961, 33442, 34287, 34864, 35334, 37177, 48274, 49067, 50791,
52114, 52728, 54547, 56413, 56826, 59311, 60416, 61196, 61850,
63257, 67009, 69268, 70260, 73661, 23479, 23929, 24592, 25223,
25806, 26370, 27576, 29322, 30067, 31670, 32224, 33184, 33535,
34792, 35242, 36615, 37709, 39014, 40690, 43199, 45041, 46178,
46717, 47277, 47810, 50404, 50956, 52215, 52788, 53241, 54447,
55675, 56210, 57100, 58765, 63026, 63679, 68971, 71276, 72867,
73799, 24590, 29347, 30606, 34185, 37677, 39006, 40041, 43744,
46158, 48638, 49874, 52021, 55689, 58049, 60456,...