Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "32gib".
Did you mean:
32gb
2010 Sep 03
0
Re: many guests on Xen 4 NR_DYNAMIC_IRQS success report...
so I am tenitively moving towards the xen 4/pv_ops kernel (2.6.32.18,
xen/stable-2.6.32.x as of yesterday).
I need a lot of guests, as our smallest hardware has 32GiB ram, and our median
guest has 256MiB ram.
we followed
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-04/msg01537.html
and changed
NR_DYNAMIC_IRQS in arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h to 2048.
we changed the .config like so:
CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ=n
then we applied the following...
2005 Jun 01
0
Re: Use NTFS Partition. -- only applies to same disk ...
...XPSP2). After the
upgrade, GRUB was broken. After re-installing GRUB, it would no longer
boot XP, because GRUB overwrote the hidden geometry info in Cylinder 0
that XP needed for boot-time support. After a few more systems, I
discovered that XP only wrote it if the boot volume passed the 33.8GB
(32GiB) barrier -- at least on my disks that were BIOS LBA32 geometry
with Sectors/Heads of 63/255.
On newer disk arrays that break the 2.2TB (2TiB) barrier by supporting
LBA48 / >255 heads, you _must_ basically use a LDM Disk Label. It
appears Microsoft is not interested in any more "hacks"...
2009 Jun 25
8
Xen network tune for fileserver in DomU
Hello, gentlemen
I need wise advice about how to tune network for performance usage
file server under domU
I use bridged network.
On dom0 network settings are:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.100
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
up /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start bridge=br0 netdev=eth0
up ifconfig br0 up
#up route add default gw
2009 Jun 14
9
What are your bottomneck in using Xen solution?
Hello,
Given that nowadays standard Dual Quad Core server is such popular,
with Dual GB Ethernet, bundles of high capacity of SATA disks running
as RAID 10.
What are the factors that prevent you from installing additional VM on
an existing server?
e.g.
1. CPU
2. Memory
3. Disk I/O
4. Network
5. Else?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
2005 Jun 21
9
[OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl>
> That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel
> Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about?
It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors.
But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation,
the same thing popped into my mind that popped