search for: 32byte

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "32byte".

Did you mean: 32bytes
2009 Jul 06
1
lvb length issue [was Re: [ocfs2-tools-devel] question of ocfs2_controld (Jun 27)]
...w_lockspace(conn->cc_name, strlen(conn->cc_name), 843 &fsdlm, DLM_LSFL_FS, DLM_LVB_LEN); ... ... 853 } DLM_LVB_LEN is 64. When mkfs.ocfs2 tries to operate on a mounted-already ocfs2 volume, mkfs.ocfs2 calls libdlm routin and tries to create a lockspace with 32byte lvb length. The lvb lengh is hard coded inside fs/dlm, can not be specified in user space. When fs/dlm code tries to compare the 32bytes lvb to the 64bytes lvb which is created in user_cluster_connect(), fs/dlm results an internal logic error(-EINVAL). This error is misleading, if both sides use...
2001 Apr 11
2
smbpasswd 2.0.7-3 matters (with smbpasswd & smb.conf...)
My message is first in english (hope you'll understand it), et en fran?ais pour ceux qui le causent. --- ENGLISH --- Hi everybody, I've got a matter with my Samba server supplied by Debien 2.2r0. testparm returns there's no problem in smb.conf. It's in 'security = DOMAIN' mode. I've got 3 boxes : SERVEUR$, POSTE1$ and POSTE2$, and 6 users, all correctly added to
2013 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] Limit loop vectorizer to SSE
Nadav, I believe aligned accesses to unaligned pointers is precisely the issue. Consider the function `add_u8S` before[1] and after[2] the loop vectorizer pass. There is no alignment assumption associated with %kernel_data prior to vectorization. I can't tell if it's the loop vectorizer or the codegen at fault, but the alignment assumption seems to sneak in somewhere. v/r, Josh [1]
2013 Nov 15
6
[LLVMdev] Limit loop vectorizer to SSE
On Nov 15, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 15 November 2013 20:24, Joshua Klontz <josh.klontz at gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, is there a pass that will insert a runtime alignment check? Also, what's the easiest way to get at TargetTransformInfo::getRegisterBitWidth() so I don't have to hard code 32? Thanks! > > I think
2012 Nov 01
41
[Request for review] [RFC] Add label support for snapshots and subvols
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> (This patch is for the review/test not yet for the integration). Here is an implementation of the feature to add label to the subvolume and snapshots. Which would help sysadmin to better manager the subvol and snapshots. This can be done in two ways, one - using attr which is user land only changes but drawback is able to change the label