search for: 32bytes

...hen a live in to the first basic block. If you must have it in a specific register, you can make your ret inst take it as a use and copy the virtual register back to the physical one for the ret. > And my second problem is with returning structures by value. ABI says that > aggregates up to 32bytes should be returned directly in register. Any advice > how this could be done? This has to be done in the front end, I think. Andrew > > Thanks > Artur > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http:...

...logue. I've noticed that in other backends RegScavenger is used for that purpose, but not from inside of those methods. So my question is how could I get an unused register from inside of these methods? And my second problem is with returning structures by value. ABI says that aggregates up to 32bytes should be returned directly in register. Any advice how this could be done? Thanks Artur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100415/0b1f7a58/attachment.html>

Hi all, I've been working for some time now on a backend for our CPU. However I couldn't figure out how to implement some stuff. I'd appreciate your help with these. First thing is return address -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100415/989f532c/attachment.html>

..., v8f32, v4f64], > 256, (sequence "YMM%u", 0, 15)>; > def VR256X : RegisterClass<"X86", [v32i8, v16i16, v8i32, v4i64, v8f32, v4f64], > 256, (sequence "YMM%u", 0, 31)>; > > Seems to be 256bits/32bytes. Yeah, don't know how I missed that. :) > > I don't know why the alignment was specified the way it is. My guess would be because memory accesses are faster that way (because they do not cross cache lines for example). This is certainly true on older cores, but is actually true on ne...

...eed a GPR register in prologue/epilogue. Aren't prologue/epilogue run after register allocation? If I copy to a virtual register, wouldn't I have to rerun the RA pass? > > > And my second problem is with returning structures by value. ABI says > that > > aggregates up to 32bytes should be returned directly in register. Any > advice > > how this could be done? > > This has to be done in the front end, I think. > There is no way of doing that in the backend? > > Andrew > Thanks, Artur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment w...

...853 } DLM_LVB_LEN is 64. When mkfs.ocfs2 tries to operate on a mounted-already ocfs2 volume, mkfs.ocfs2 calls libdlm routin and tries to create a lockspace with 32byte lvb length. The lvb lengh is hard coded inside fs/dlm, can not be specified in user space. When fs/dlm code tries to compare the 32bytes lvb to the 64bytes lvb which is created in user_cluster_connect(), fs/dlm results an internal logic error(-EINVAL). This error is misleading, if both sides use same length lvb, the returned error can be busy domain(-EEXIST:), which is the correct one to be expected. After checking the code of mkf...

Looking around today, it appears that TargetRegisterClass and MCRegisterClass only includes a single alignment. This is documented as being the minimum legal alignment, but it appears to often be greater than this in practice. For instance, on x86 the alignment of %ymm0 is listed as 32, not 1. Does anyone know why this is? Additionally, where are these alignments actually defined? I

I am looking for PHP functions that implement passwords that much the dovecotpw implementation. I downloaded one from PEAR, Crypt_HMAC, but the passwords it generates look nothing like the dovecotpw passwords, which could be my fault because I know nothing about the field. Is there a guide or some library that implements them to match dovecotpw?

...ot;t": 3, "value": moderate_value }, + { "key": "30Bytes", "t": 3, "value": (moderate_value*2)[:30] }, + { "key": "31Bytes", "t": 3, "value": (moderate_value*2)[:31] }, + { "key": "32Bytes", "t": 3, "value": moderate_value*2 }, + { "key": "33Bytes", "t": 3, "value": (moderate_value*3)[:33] }, +] +h.node_set_values (mvp, values) + +new_moderate_value = h.node_get_value (mvp, "16Bytes") + +assert h.value_valu...

Hi there, I'm using samba-2.2.2 under Solaris 8 and I've got the following problem! I have configured samba with "--with-utmp" and with "--with-quota" and everything works fine. But when look for the last users logged in, in the utmp-database there are only the first seven letters of the username, not eight that we use for usernames. Can you help me with this problem

...an unsigned short or int depending of the platform. It is supposed to work. About unsigned short to short conversion it is normal since unsigned short starts at 0 and short starts at -((2^16)/2)-1 [-32767]. If you really want to keep the same numeric value you could cast the short to unsigned int (32bytes) and add 32767 to the value. On 12-03-09 02:59 AM, Mashal al-shboul wrote: Hi Speex Experts,Thanks for this great mailing list. > > >???? i want to compress a frame of(uint16_t) audio samples, i found that speex codec assumes input frame of type short. fortunately,both data types are of...

I'm looking at doing some really large linear algebra problems. I followed the helpful instructions in the back of the installation guide for rather aggressive compilation options on 64-bit Solaris. Happily, I can address more than 6GB of RAM at once in R, so I the 64 bit part works fine. With the Sun Performance libraries, R is also very fast. One thing that still bugs me is the maximum