search for: 31gb

I have setup rsync to backup another linux computer with the link-dest option and realized storage savings. 1st backup is 31gb, daily backups only take approx 4gb. But when I rsync with link-dest to usb external drive all backups take up 31gb. Following is 1st the one that works and 2nd with no storage savings. Any ideas? Thanks, Frank date>/aeprodbk/bkupdate d=`date +%d` date > $d.log root@aebkup:/aeprodbk/$d &g...

...er: In the context where this algorithm is applied in Rufus, we don't care about non FAT32 computations, or ones performed for disks that are less than 32 GB in size (for which the sectors per cluster will never be 1 even with 4K sectors as our minimal cluster size is 8K as soon as we reach 31GB). That's not to say that I wouldn't pick on improvements to the new computation algorithm [1] when low values are used, if such improvements are actually needed, and if *somebody else* kindly wants to figure them out, as there is always the possibility that other developers might re-us...

...# The scan function finishes without a problem. "x" is in double precision floating point format and takes up 12886.5Mb of memory at the first object.size() statement. When I convert it to a matrix I get an error stating that I cannot allocate a vector of size 12.6Gb. I have requested 31Gb of memory on the server. 12.6+ 12.8 = 25.4Gb of used memory. Is it that R is using considerable memory for operations not directly related to storing the matrix objects here? Or is this perhaps a problem of contiguous memory? Any help is greatly appreciated. -Scott -- View this message in c...

Hi Ady, I won't comment on the reasons why the original computation was wrong, but thanks for the detailed analysis. On 2016.02.26 08:05, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> Thus we can finally get a formula for Fs that satisfies the above: >> >> Fs = (To - Rs + Nf * Cs) / ((Ss * Cs / Fe) + Nf) + 1 > > I believe such formula is slightly inaccurate too. > > My

Hi, I have two 64 bit cent Os machine. I googled that in linux always show entire memory as used. But below showing only 1 GB detected. *Machine 1 :* i) It has 31 GB of ram. [root at machine1]# free -g total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 31 1 30 0 0 0 -/+ buffers/cache: 0 30

...from source. The process of getting everything up and running was very easy. I have one big 140GB partition that is synced with drbd (in c-mode) and has an ocfs2 filesystem on it. The servers will be webservers so the data ist the whole document-root (mostly pdfs for download) and CGIs. I rsynced 31GB of data from another server onto this partition last week and did some simple testing and everything looked good. Today though, I typed in the url of one of the servers in my browser and didn't get anything back but an apache-error after a 3 minute timeout of the cgi-script. The same with the s...

I'm setting up this huge RAID 6 box. I've always thought of hot spares, but I'm reading things that are comparing RAID 5 with a hot spare to RAID 6, implying that the latter doesn't need one. I *certainly* have enough drives to spare in this RAID box: 42 of 'em, so two questions: should I assign one or more hot spares, and, if so, how many? mark

We are in the process of migrating several stand-alone server hosts onto a CentOS-6 kvm virtual host. We also use Webmin to administer our hosts. All of the guests, without exception, have been cloned brom a prototype guest using virt-manager. All of the additional VirtIO disks assigned to some of the guests have been added through virt-manager as well. Recently I have encountered a situation

We are in the process of migrating several stand-alone server hosts onto a CentOS-6 kvm virtual host. We also use Webmin to administer our hosts. All of the guests, without exception, have been cloned brom a prototype guest using virt-manager. All of the additional VirtIO disks assigned to some of the guests have been added through virt-manager as well. Recently I have encountered a situation