search for: 315,17

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "315,17".

Did you mean: 15,17
2016 Nov 02
0
[PATCH v3 07/15] secboot: generate HS BL descriptor in hook
...de_dma_base; +struct hsf_load_header { u32 non_sec_code_off; u32 non_sec_code_size; - u32 sec_code_off; - u32 sec_code_size; - u32 code_entry_point; - struct flcn_u64 data_dma_base; + u32 data_dma_base; u32 data_size; + u32 num_apps; + struct hsf_load_header_app app[0]; }; /** @@ -322,11 +315,17 @@ struct gm200_secboot { * on Tegra the HS FW copies the LS blob into the fixed WPR instead */ struct nvkm_gpuobj *acr_load_blob; - struct gm200_flcn_bl_desc acr_load_bl_desc; + struct { + struct hsf_load_header load_bl_header; + struct hsf_load_header_app __load_apps[GM200_ACR_MAX_AP...
2017 Aug 08
5
[PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".
...radeon_framebuffer_init(rdev->ddev, &rfbdev->fb, &mode_cmd, gobj); if (ret) { DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize framebuffer %d\n", ret); goto out; } - fb = &rfbdev->rfb.base; + fb = &rfbdev->fb; /* setup helper */ rfbdev->helper.fb = fb; @@ -315,17 +315,17 @@ void radeon_fb_output_poll_changed(struct radeon_device *rdev) static int radeon_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev) { - struct radeon_framebuffer *rfb = &rfbdev->rfb; + struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &rfbdev->fb; drm_fb_helper_unregi...
2017 Aug 08
5
[PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".
...radeon_framebuffer_init(rdev->ddev, &rfbdev->fb, &mode_cmd, gobj); if (ret) { DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize framebuffer %d\n", ret); goto out; } - fb = &rfbdev->rfb.base; + fb = &rfbdev->fb; /* setup helper */ rfbdev->helper.fb = fb; @@ -315,17 +315,17 @@ void radeon_fb_output_poll_changed(struct radeon_device *rdev) static int radeon_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev) { - struct radeon_framebuffer *rfb = &rfbdev->rfb; + struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &rfbdev->fb; drm_fb_helper_unregi...
2017 Aug 08
5
[PATCH libdrm] drm: Remove create_handle() drm_framebuffer "virtual".
...radeon_framebuffer_init(rdev->ddev, &rfbdev->fb, &mode_cmd, gobj); if (ret) { DRM_ERROR("failed to initialize framebuffer %d\n", ret); goto out; } - fb = &rfbdev->rfb.base; + fb = &rfbdev->fb; /* setup helper */ rfbdev->helper.fb = fb; @@ -315,17 +315,17 @@ void radeon_fb_output_poll_changed(struct radeon_device *rdev) static int radeon_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct radeon_fbdev *rfbdev) { - struct radeon_framebuffer *rfb = &rfbdev->rfb; + struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &rfbdev->fb; drm_fb_helper_unregi...
2010 Aug 12
0
[PATCH, v2]: xl: Implement per-API-call garbage-collection lifetime
...libxl_xs_kvs_of_flexarray(ctx, back, boffset)); + libxl_xs_writev(gc, t, be_path, + libxl_xs_kvs_of_flexarray(gc, back, boffset)); if (!xs_transaction_end(ctx->xsh, t, 0)) if (errno == EAGAIN) goto retry_transaction; @@ -313,16 +315,17 @@ retry_transaction: return 0; } -static int libxl_device_pci_remove_xenstore(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid, libxl_device_pci *pcidev) +static int libxl_device_pci_remove_xenstore(libxl_gc *gc, uint32_t domid, libxl_device_pci *pcidev) { + libxl_ctx *ctx = libxl_gc_owner(gc);...
2016 Oct 27
15
[PATCH v2 00/14] Secure Boot refactoring
This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the
2016 Nov 02
15
[PATCH v3 00/15] Secure Boot refactoring
This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the
2016 Nov 21
33
[PATCH v4 0/33] Secure Boot refactoring / signed PMU firmware support for GM20B
This revision includes initial signed PMU firmware support for GM20B (Tegra X1). This PMU code will also be used as a basis for dGPU signed PMU firmware support. With the PMU code, the refactoring of secure boot should also make more sense. ACR (secure boot) support is now separated by the driver version it originates from. This separation allows to run any version of the ACR on any chip,