Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "30.10".
Did you mean:
30.0
2010 Apr 08
3
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10
with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark
results (with no test failures)...
================================================================================
Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16
Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4
Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3
2010 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10
> with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark
> results (with no test failures)...
Very nice! A 14% speedup on a benchmark we don't tune for isn't bad. I imagine that there are several easy wins you could get on it if you were interested
2010 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 regressions
Comparing the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for gfortran from
llvm-gcc-4.2 of April 7th, 2010 and September 18th, 2010 (from
the rc2 2.8 release branch), we seem to be regressing in performance
for this release....
================================================================================
Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16
Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4
Compile Command :
2010 Apr 08
3
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:54:36PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10
> > with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark
> > results (with no test failures)...
>
> Very nice! A 14% speedup on a benchmark we don't tune for
2010 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
[CCing Dale since this was his change, not mine]
The change in 81455 fixes a compiler crash. It doesn't happen very often, but I can't imagine we would want to back that out. Fixing it would be a more reasonable solution. From a quick look at it, the problem is that gcc/config/darwin-c.c is registering va_opt for GC. When you build for Fortran, darwin-c.o is not linked so the GC gets
2006 Jul 17
10
String manipulation and formatting
I'm trying to write a simple function that does the following:
[command] xify(5.2)
[output] XXX.XX
[command] xify(3)
[output] XXX
Any simple solutions (without using python/perl/unix script/...)?
Thanks,
Saghir
---------------------------------------------------------
Legal Notice: This electronic mail and its attachments are i...{{dropped}}
2010 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:45:48AM -0700, Bob Wilson wrote:
> [CCing Dale since this was his change, not mine]
>
> The change in 81455 fixes a compiler crash. It doesn't happen very often, but I can't imagine we would want to back that out. Fixing it would be a more reasonable solution. From a quick look at it, the problem is that gcc/config/darwin-c.c is registering va_opt
2010 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:45 AMPDT, Bob Wilson wrote:
> [CCing Dale since this was his change, not mine]
>
> The change in 81455 fixes a compiler crash. It doesn't happen very often, but I can't imagine we would want to back that out. Fixing it would be a more reasonable solution. From a quick look at it, the problem is that gcc/config/darwin-c.c is registering va_opt for GC.
2007 Feb 01
1
Problem with dom0_mem and tmpfs on SLES10
Hello friends!
In this week, i had a problem with Xen version 3.0.2_09749-0.7 on SLES10 for
x86, when
the initrd-xen file was loaded. On console, various messages about "No space
left on device"
appears later that the "/dev" was monted on a tmpfs filesystem (for udev).
The only sollution for this problem at that moment, was remove the
"dom0_mem=192M" and the
2011 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
> failing here with...
It was broken. I think I've fixed it in reverting 125960.
-eric
2011 Feb 22
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:58:19PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
> > failing here with...
>
> It was broken. I think I've fixed it in reverting 125960.
>
> -eric
Eric,
The llvm-gcc42 bootstrap is fixed in
2011 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
failing here with...
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm-gcc42-2.9-0/llvm_gcc42_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/llvm-gcc42-2.9-0/llvm_gcc42_objdir/./prev-gcc/ -B/sw/lib/llvm-gcc-4.2/x86_64-apple-darwin10/bin/ -c -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
2020 Jul 31
6
8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable
Il 31/07/20 13:08, ja ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 22:35 +1200, Alan McRae via CentOS wrote:
>> I am running an Intel x64 machine using UEFI to boot an SSD.
>>
>> Installing the latest yum update which includes grub2 and kernel
>> 4.18.0-193.14.2.el8_2.x86_64 renders the machine unbootable, blank
>> screen where grub should be, no error messages, just hangs.