Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10
with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark
results (with no test failures)...
===============================================================================Date
& Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16
Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4
Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o
%n
Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct
linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft
Maximum Times : 2000.0
Target Error % : 0.100
Minimum Repeats : 10
Maximum Repeats : 100
Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim
Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err %
--------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------
ac 0.34 10000 12.85 10 0.0067
aermod 20.01 10000 15.42 10 0.0076
air 1.52 10000 7.50 12 0.0934
capacita 0.58 10000 45.67 10 0.0152
channel 0.41 10000 2.19 10 0.0365
doduc 2.29 10000 29.08 10 0.0140
fatigue 1.02 10000 8.83 10 0.0582
gas_dyn 0.77 10000 13.12 21 0.0909
induct 2.54 10000 24.22 10 0.0096
linpk 0.28 10000 15.67 10 0.0343
mdbx 0.79 10000 12.09 10 0.0070
nf 0.33 10000 30.10 12 0.0751
protein 1.10 10000 42.02 10 0.0100
rnflow 1.53 10000 32.00 10 0.0214
test_fpu 1.28 10000 11.73 10 0.0446
tfft 0.24 10000 2.16 13 0.0988
Geometric Mean Execution Time = 14.07 seconds
===============================================================================
This compares to the last time I ran these for the release 2.5 branch...
===============================================================================Date
& Time : 2 Feb 2009 23:57:03
Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4
Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o
%n
Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct
linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft
Maximum Times : 2000.0
Target Error % : 0.100
Minimum Repeats : 10
Maximum Repeats : 100
Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim
Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err %
--------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------
ac 0.28 10000 15.01 10 0.0805
aermod 16.03 10000 15.83 10 0.0772
air 1.62 10000 8.21 10 0.0472
capacita 0.47 10000 51.23 10 0.0261
channel 0.23 10000 3.32 10 0.0106
doduc 1.64 10000 34.17 10 0.0060
fatigue 0.70 10000 12.74 10 0.0572
gas_dyn 0.55 10000 16.07 10 0.0771
induct 1.75 10000 26.54 10 0.0017
linpk 0.22 10000 15.42 10 0.0205
mdbx 0.63 10000 14.13 12 0.0162
nf 0.26 10000 29.01 10 0.0909
protein 0.70 10000 44.89 10 0.0133
rnflow 1.09 10000 39.58 10 0.0212
test_fpu 0.89 10000 14.02 10 0.0132
tfft 0.17 10000 2.20 12 0.0149
Geometric Mean Execution Time = 16.15 seconds
===============================================================================
In general, since the 2.5 release, the code performance is better
but the compile time is somewhat regressed.
Jack
Chris Lattner
2010-Apr-08 04:54 UTC
[LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:> Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark > results (with no test failures)...Very nice! A 14% speedup on a benchmark we don't tune for isn't bad. I imagine that there are several easy wins you could get on it if you were interested in analyzing the performance. I don't think that anyone has done *any* llvm-gfortran perf work. -Chris> > ===============================================================================> Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16 > Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 > Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n > Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft > Maximum Times : 2000.0 > Target Error % : 0.100 > Minimum Repeats : 10 > Maximum Repeats : 100 > > Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim > Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % > --------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ > ac 0.34 10000 12.85 10 0.0067 > aermod 20.01 10000 15.42 10 0.0076 > air 1.52 10000 7.50 12 0.0934 > capacita 0.58 10000 45.67 10 0.0152 > channel 0.41 10000 2.19 10 0.0365 > doduc 2.29 10000 29.08 10 0.0140 > fatigue 1.02 10000 8.83 10 0.0582 > gas_dyn 0.77 10000 13.12 21 0.0909 > induct 2.54 10000 24.22 10 0.0096 > linpk 0.28 10000 15.67 10 0.0343 > mdbx 0.79 10000 12.09 10 0.0070 > nf 0.33 10000 30.10 12 0.0751 > protein 1.10 10000 42.02 10 0.0100 > rnflow 1.53 10000 32.00 10 0.0214 > test_fpu 1.28 10000 11.73 10 0.0446 > tfft 0.24 10000 2.16 13 0.0988 > > Geometric Mean Execution Time = 14.07 seconds > > ===============================================================================> > This compares to the last time I ran these for the release 2.5 branch... > > ===============================================================================> Date & Time : 2 Feb 2009 23:57:03 > Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 > Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n > Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft > Maximum Times : 2000.0 > Target Error % : 0.100 > Minimum Repeats : 10 > Maximum Repeats : 100 > > Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim > Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % > --------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ > ac 0.28 10000 15.01 10 0.0805 > aermod 16.03 10000 15.83 10 0.0772 > air 1.62 10000 8.21 10 0.0472 > capacita 0.47 10000 51.23 10 0.0261 > channel 0.23 10000 3.32 10 0.0106 > doduc 1.64 10000 34.17 10 0.0060 > fatigue 0.70 10000 12.74 10 0.0572 > gas_dyn 0.55 10000 16.07 10 0.0771 > induct 1.75 10000 26.54 10 0.0017 > linpk 0.22 10000 15.42 10 0.0205 > mdbx 0.63 10000 14.13 12 0.0162 > nf 0.26 10000 29.01 10 0.0909 > protein 0.70 10000 44.89 10 0.0133 > rnflow 1.09 10000 39.58 10 0.0212 > test_fpu 0.89 10000 14.02 10 0.0132 > tfft 0.17 10000 2.20 12 0.0149 > > Geometric Mean Execution Time = 16.15 seconds > > ===============================================================================> > In general, since the 2.5 release, the code performance is better > but the compile time is somewhat regressed. > Jack > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:54:36PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:> > On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > > with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark > > results (with no test failures)... > > Very nice! A 14% speedup on a benchmark we don't tune for isn't bad. I imagine that there are several easy wins you could get on it if you were interested in analyzing the performance. I don't think that anyone has done *any* llvm-gfortran perf work. > > -Chris >Chris, Slightly off-topic, I've just added a fsf-gdb package to fink to provide darwin users with a gdb 7.1 release for i386-apple-darwin/x86_64-apple-darwin. This will help with debugging issues in gfortran since I believe gdb 6.8 had relatively poor support for certain areas of gfortran's code generation. Jack> > > > ===============================================================================> > Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16 > > Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 > > Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n > > Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft > > Maximum Times : 2000.0 > > Target Error % : 0.100 > > Minimum Repeats : 10 > > Maximum Repeats : 100 > > > > Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim > > Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % > > --------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ > > ac 0.34 10000 12.85 10 0.0067 > > aermod 20.01 10000 15.42 10 0.0076 > > air 1.52 10000 7.50 12 0.0934 > > capacita 0.58 10000 45.67 10 0.0152 > > channel 0.41 10000 2.19 10 0.0365 > > doduc 2.29 10000 29.08 10 0.0140 > > fatigue 1.02 10000 8.83 10 0.0582 > > gas_dyn 0.77 10000 13.12 21 0.0909 > > induct 2.54 10000 24.22 10 0.0096 > > linpk 0.28 10000 15.67 10 0.0343 > > mdbx 0.79 10000 12.09 10 0.0070 > > nf 0.33 10000 30.10 12 0.0751 > > protein 1.10 10000 42.02 10 0.0100 > > rnflow 1.53 10000 32.00 10 0.0214 > > test_fpu 1.28 10000 11.73 10 0.0446 > > tfft 0.24 10000 2.16 13 0.0988 > > > > Geometric Mean Execution Time = 14.07 seconds > > > > ===============================================================================> > > > This compares to the last time I ran these for the release 2.5 branch... > > > > ===============================================================================> > Date & Time : 2 Feb 2009 23:57:03 > > Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 > > Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n > > Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft > > Maximum Times : 2000.0 > > Target Error % : 0.100 > > Minimum Repeats : 10 > > Maximum Repeats : 100 > > > > Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim > > Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % > > --------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ > > ac 0.28 10000 15.01 10 0.0805 > > aermod 16.03 10000 15.83 10 0.0772 > > air 1.62 10000 8.21 10 0.0472 > > capacita 0.47 10000 51.23 10 0.0261 > > channel 0.23 10000 3.32 10 0.0106 > > doduc 1.64 10000 34.17 10 0.0060 > > fatigue 0.70 10000 12.74 10 0.0572 > > gas_dyn 0.55 10000 16.07 10 0.0771 > > induct 1.75 10000 26.54 10 0.0017 > > linpk 0.22 10000 15.42 10 0.0205 > > mdbx 0.63 10000 14.13 12 0.0162 > > nf 0.26 10000 29.01 10 0.0909 > > protein 0.70 10000 44.89 10 0.0133 > > rnflow 1.09 10000 39.58 10 0.0212 > > test_fpu 0.89 10000 14.02 10 0.0132 > > tfft 0.17 10000 2.20 12 0.0149 > > > > Geometric Mean Execution Time = 16.15 seconds > > > > ===============================================================================> > > > In general, since the 2.5 release, the code performance is better > > but the compile time is somewhat regressed. > > Jack > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:54:36PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:> > On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > > with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark > > results (with no test failures)... > > Very nice! A 14% speedup on a benchmark we don't tune for isn't bad. I imagine that there are several easy wins you could get on it if you were interested in analyzing the performance. I don't think that anyone has done *any* llvm-gfortran perf work. > > -ChrisChris, How essential is r81455 to the llvm-gcc4.2-2.7 release? Can we regress it out for 2.7? I've tried all of the suggestions in... http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6778 from Duncan for moving va_opt into darwin.c as an extern. While this works at first glance, it destablizes the parallel make. Regressing r81455 doesn't appear to cause any problems. Jack> > > > > ===============================================================================> > Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16 > > Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 > > Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n > > Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft > > Maximum Times : 2000.0 > > Target Error % : 0.100 > > Minimum Repeats : 10 > > Maximum Repeats : 100 > > > > Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim > > Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % > > --------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ > > ac 0.34 10000 12.85 10 0.0067 > > aermod 20.01 10000 15.42 10 0.0076 > > air 1.52 10000 7.50 12 0.0934 > > capacita 0.58 10000 45.67 10 0.0152 > > channel 0.41 10000 2.19 10 0.0365 > > doduc 2.29 10000 29.08 10 0.0140 > > fatigue 1.02 10000 8.83 10 0.0582 > > gas_dyn 0.77 10000 13.12 21 0.0909 > > induct 2.54 10000 24.22 10 0.0096 > > linpk 0.28 10000 15.67 10 0.0343 > > mdbx 0.79 10000 12.09 10 0.0070 > > nf 0.33 10000 30.10 12 0.0751 > > protein 1.10 10000 42.02 10 0.0100 > > rnflow 1.53 10000 32.00 10 0.0214 > > test_fpu 1.28 10000 11.73 10 0.0446 > > tfft 0.24 10000 2.16 13 0.0988 > > > > Geometric Mean Execution Time = 14.07 seconds > > > > ===============================================================================> > > > This compares to the last time I ran these for the release 2.5 branch... > > > > ===============================================================================> > Date & Time : 2 Feb 2009 23:57:03 > > Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 > > Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n > > Benchmarks : ac aermod air capacita channel doduc fatigue gas_dyn induct linpk mdbx nf protein rnflow test_fpu tfft > > Maximum Times : 2000.0 > > Target Error % : 0.100 > > Minimum Repeats : 10 > > Maximum Repeats : 100 > > > > Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim > > Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % > > --------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------ > > ac 0.28 10000 15.01 10 0.0805 > > aermod 16.03 10000 15.83 10 0.0772 > > air 1.62 10000 8.21 10 0.0472 > > capacita 0.47 10000 51.23 10 0.0261 > > channel 0.23 10000 3.32 10 0.0106 > > doduc 1.64 10000 34.17 10 0.0060 > > fatigue 0.70 10000 12.74 10 0.0572 > > gas_dyn 0.55 10000 16.07 10 0.0771 > > induct 1.75 10000 26.54 10 0.0017 > > linpk 0.22 10000 15.42 10 0.0205 > > mdbx 0.63 10000 14.13 12 0.0162 > > nf 0.26 10000 29.01 10 0.0909 > > protein 0.70 10000 44.89 10 0.0133 > > rnflow 1.09 10000 39.58 10 0.0212 > > test_fpu 0.89 10000 14.02 10 0.0132 > > tfft 0.17 10000 2.20 12 0.0149 > > > > Geometric Mean Execution Time = 16.15 seconds > > > > ===============================================================================> > > > In general, since the 2.5 release, the code performance is better > > but the compile time is somewhat regressed. > > Jack > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
- [LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
- [LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
- [LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results
- [LLVMdev] darwin llvm-gfortran Polyhedron 2005 results