search for: 2x2tb

Greetings, I have a system x3100 m4 system with 64GB SSD for OS and 2x2tb for data as MD device (software RAID). It had Fedora 17 with EFI/ I tried to install centos 6. deleting the existing partitions on the SSD /dev/sdc. sda and sdb are the 2x2tb md device mounted on /home. no joy. googling Questions: 1. Where do I locate the boot loader? /dev/sdc? is MBR (the de...

Hi, I have added 2x2Tb to my existing 2x2Tb raid 1 btrfs filesystem and then ran a balance: # btrfs filesystem show Total devices 4 FS bytes used 1.74TB devid 3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdd devid 4 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sde devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.75TB path /d...

Hi there. I'm currently configuring a brand new email server(IMAP) which will run CentOS 6.3 x64. So lots of files on the data volume. I'm confused about stripe size for my data volume. I'm using 2x500GB for OS in RAID1 and 2x2TB SAS for DATA in RAID1 which is hosted on a HP Smart Array P420 Controller with 1GB in Cache/Battery Backed Up. Both these array's are on the P420 controller. The initial configuring from Array Configuration Tools gives me 256K in Strip Size. On both array's. What would be ideal for the d...

...hat would be a reasonable size for user profiles on a 100MBit/s network so they load sufficiently speedy? Also should I consider something when I configure GPOs and printers some weeks after first user logins? Can I put home directories, shares, profiles and spooling on one 2TB disk on a RAID1 (2x2TB) or would this be a performance problem? (worst case scenario I can imagine is 5-8 simultaneous user logins or logouts which should happen very rarely. 2-3 simultaneus logins/logouts is more likely to happen frequently.) regards, birgit

...configurations. if I look at the side of the ifstat command, I can note my IO write processes never exceed 3MBs... EXT4 native FS seems to be faster (roughly 15-20% but no more) than XFS one My [test] storage cluster config is composed by 2 identical servers (biCPU Intel Xeon X5355, 8GB of RAM, 2x2TB HDD (no-RAID) and Gb ethernet) My volume settings: single: 1server 1 brick replicated: 2 servers 1 brick each distributed: 2 servers 2 bricks each dist-repl: 2 bricks in the same server and replica 2 All seems to be OK in gluster status command line. Do you have an idea why I obtain so bad r...

...ide of the ifstat command, I can note my IO write > processes never exceed 3MBs... > > EXT4 native FS seems to be faster (roughly 15-20% but no more) than > XFS one > > My [test] storage cluster config is composed by 2 identical servers > (biCPU Intel Xeon X5355, 8GB of RAM, 2x2TB HDD (no-RAID) and Gb ethernet) > > My volume settings: > single: 1server 1 brick > replicated: 2 servers 1 brick each > distributed: 2 servers 2 bricks each > dist-repl: 2 bricks in the same server and replica 2 > > All seems to be OK in gluster status command line. > &gt...

...for user profiles on a 100MBit/s network > so they load sufficiently speedy? > > Also should I consider something when I configure GPOs and printers some > weeks after first user logins? > > Can I put home directories, shares, profiles and spooling on one 2TB disk > on a RAID1 (2x2TB) or would this be a performance problem? (worst case > scenario I can imagine is 5-8 simultaneous user logins or logouts which > should happen very rarely. 2-3 simultaneus logins/logouts is more likely > to happen frequently.) > > regards, birgit > > > > -- > To unsubs...

Hi, we´ve got a bad problem here. We installed a new server with debian squeeze sw-raid and lvm. We´ve installed the the actual xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64? system with grub2 but get an XEN BUG. We´ve tried alot, tested grub-legacy version but cannot get the XEN kernel to boot up. The XEN BUG occurs a  second after grub boots the kernel and there are no outputs at the serial console with

Thanks, The 3 servers are new Lenovo units with redundant PS backed by two huge UPS units (on for each bank of power supplies). I think the chances of losing two nodes is incredibly slim, and in that case a Disaster Recovery from offsite backups would be reasonable. My requirements are about 2TB, highly available (so that I can reboot one of the 3 servers without taking down services). Beyond

On 09/04/18 19:02, Vincent Royer wrote: > Thanks, > > I suppose what I'm trying to gain is some clarity on what choice is > best for a given application.? How do I know if it's better for me to > use a raid card or not, to include flash-cache on it or not, to use > ZFS or not, when combined with a small number of SSDs in Replica 3. > > How few is "small

...r main host. I use hostA as my primary host. Both machines are located at Hetzner in Germany. HostA is in DC6 and HostB is in DC12. Not situated next to eachother but low latency links between them. Both machines are connected to gbit uplinks and are not very highly loaded. The machines consist of 2x2TB disk (mirrored with ZFS) and 8cores, 32GB RAM. There were warnings when manually doing the sync that the mailbox changed in between and should be reissued, after which the mailboxes kept growing. Previously I reported two messages here which might be the foundation of the same issue: https://dove...

Hi all :) I''ve been wanting to make the switch from XFS over RAID5 to ZFS/RAIDZ2 for some time now, ever since I read about ZFS the first time. Absolutely amazing beast! I''ve built my own little hobby server at home and have a boatload of disks in different sizes that I''ve been using together to build a RAID5 array on Linux using mdadm in two layers; first layer is

Which consumer-priced 1.5TB drives do people currently recommend? I had zero read/write/checksum errors so far in 2 years with my trusty old Western Digital WD7500AAKS drives, but now I want to upgrade to a new set of drives that are big, reliable and cheap. As of Jan 2010 it seems the price sweet spot is the 1.5TB drives. As I had a lot of success with Western Digital drives I thought I would