Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "2.2tb".
2008 Jul 24
6
6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos
I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition,
but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this
with an Adaptec controller but apparently they are only (any of them) 48
bits wide. Does anybody have a working system for SCSI/Centos over
2.2TB?
Milt Mallory
Topix.com
650-461-8316
Always consider the issues of progressive enhancement and
2005 Aug 22
2
64 bit hardware and filesystem size limit
We recently bought a 32-bit Xeon system with a 12-port 3Ware RAID card
and a dozen 500GB drives. We wanted to create 4TB drive arrays;
however, we soon discovered that there is about a 2.2TB drive array size
limit on 32-bit hardware. Does that sound correct?
Would replacing the 32-bit mobo/cpu with a 64-bit mobo/cpu allow us to
use drive arrays larger than 2.2TB?
Thanks.
2006 Jan 03
1
Large partition problem
I really hope someone has a clue on this one.... :)
I've got a 2.2TB array mounted on a 3ware 9500 controller. I installed it
last week ensuring that LBA was enabled and using gpt with parted to get
the full size available on one array. I also think I chose reiserfs for
the array. We then moved ALOT of data to the array.
Problem now is that after a reboot LBA doesn't seem to be in
2005 Apr 25
1
bugs with large partitions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I installed centos4 on a raid system with 7 400GB Hitachi SATA disks in
RAID 5 on the 3Ware card. I set up a 2.2TB EXT3 Partition /opt.
After the install I rebooted and the system went straight into
maintenance mode....! The system reported a problem with /opt, but I was
able to mount it manually and init 4 with no problems. However a reboot
dropped
2005 Jun 01
0
Re: Use NTFS Partition. -- only applies to same disk ...
From: Mark Jarvis <mark.jarvis at pvmail.maricopa.edu>
> HUH? FAT32 problem???
No, it's a geometry issue on legacy BIOS/DOS Disk Labels (Partition Table
Format) aka "Basic Disc" in NT5+ (2000+) when both NT and Linux share
the disk for booting.
Microsoft never standardized how geometry should be handled after NT4.0
Service Pack 4 (SP4) other than using legacy LBA32 --
2010 May 28
0
Samba reporting only ~4G on a much larger filesystem
I tried this on the IRC channel and got not response...
I have a 2.2TB filesystem. The filesystem itself is a stornext (Quantum) filesystem, which in the /etc/fstab is type cvfs.
When a client mounts the samba share, it only reports ~4GB (3.9 or 3.7 GB) total space. We have a third party app, which will/can not be updated which checks the disk space available and fails if it's not enough.