search for: 2kbit

I have - HZ - recompiled to 1000 - class nr 1 - 2kbit ceil 1024kbit - class nr 2 - 16kbit ceil1024kbit But class 1 works with 20kbit/sec and class 2 with 60kbit/sec. The proportion does not seems right. Thank you. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lar...

...9;'s what I want: root class 0010 premium parent class 1000 premium child classes 1xyz best-effort parent class 2000 best-effort child classes 2xyz default class 3000 Here''s how I do it: eth1: DEFAULT=3000 eth1-0010.root: RATE=100Mbit LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000.premium CEIL=352Kbit RATE=352Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 CEIL=32Kbit RATE=8Kbit PRIO=3 LEAF=sfq RULE=<public ip>, eth1-0010:2000.best-effort CEIL=500Kbit RATE=500Kbit PRIO=3 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:2000:2xyz.child1 CEIL=16Kbit RATE=8Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq RULE=<public ip>, eth1-0010:3000.de...

What is wrong in this line? tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:521df18 htb rate 2Kbit ceil 24000Kbit prio 3 quantum 2000 I know the classid is wrong, but what is the correct syntax? Thank you.

...he way it was. so I put a prio qdisc at the root of eth0 (dummy priomap since i want to use filters to switch bands): $ tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 2 priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 then attach a tbf qdisc at 1:2 : $ tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf rate 2kbit buffer 100 limit 300 now i want traffic to port 4662 to be enqueued to the tbf qdisc: $ tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport 4662 0xffff flowid 1:2 but it doesn''t work: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument why? wrong syntax? thanks Radu _______________...

...MELP (800 Bit/s), but, according to Wikipedia, it has some Patent rights so it can't be used freely. The only melp code I found so far available for download only has some Microsoft Developer Studio build information. So far, speex has a bandwith of 2150 Bits/s. Which is almost below the 2kBit/s border. So far of course I am also thinking about making the channel wider or improving the Modulation, and about the whole Quality/Fault-tolerance/Bandwith thing. So, what do you think? best regards Hans -- This final error message indicates a successful installation of a UNIX...

I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn''t get any answers. The problem is that traffic doesn''t get into the user classes (~150) when I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I dont''t associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well.

Hello, I''m having such problem with HFSC with following config: + tc qdisc del dev eth3 root + tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: hfsc default 2 + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 512kbit ul rate 512kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 2kbit ul rate 400kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 hfsc ls rate 32kbit ul rate 32kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:4 hfsc ls rate 300kbit ul rate 300kbit Let''s say i start to...

...[root@cab2 root]# cat yemp #!/bin/sh tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 100 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit burst 5k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 256kbit ceil 1mbit burst 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:10 classid 1:100 htb rate 2kbit burst 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:10 classid 1:101 htb rate 4kbit burst 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:10 classid 1:102 htb rate 32kbit burst 2 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 10.1.1.0/24 match tcp dst 25 0xffff flowid 1:100 tc filter add dev eth0 prot...

Hello guys, I past the last days trying to configure my shorewall 4.06 firewall to allow openvpn bridging connection. My scenario is the following: roadwarrior (openvpn client) -------------> Internet ------------> (X.Y.W.Z - eth0) Firewall/Gateway (10.x.x.254 - eth1) --------> Local Lan -------> OpenVPN Server (10.x.x.249 - br0) where 10.x.x.0-254 is my private lan X.Y.Z.W is

...put -s 192.168.1.240 -j ACCEPT -m 0x3 ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.240 -j MASQ -m 0x3 And the filter: tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 handle 2 fw classid 1:2 And after all no packets traverse the following class: tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 1kbit ceil 2kbit prio 20 (rates are examples only for testing). Any ideas? Thanks, Balint Laszlo BILLER, .:[=SysNet=]:. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...o ~10 KB/s. My connection is 768/128 DSL. I found a script at http://www.knowplace.org/shaper/examples.html $TC qdisc add dev $INTERFACE root handle 1: htb default 60 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 116kbit $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 32kbit ceil 116kbit prio 0 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 22kbit ceil 116kbit prio 1 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 22kbit ceil 116kbit prio 2 $TC class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:40 htb rate 20kbit ceil 116kbit prio 3 $TC class ad...

> Can this be addressed in ssh_config/sshd_config with the KexAlgorithms setting? weakdh.org/sysadmin.html recommends adding: KexAlgorithms curve25519-sha256 at libssh.org But this thread makes it sound as if it's not necessary. Can anyone confirm? Personally I'm on openssh-6.7. - Grant > You will be aware of https://weakdh.org/ by now, I presume; the take-home seems to be

...> iptables -F INPUT -t mangle -> iptables -F PREROUTING -t mangle -> iptables -F POSTROUTING -t mangle -> iptables -F FORWARD -t mangle -> -> # HTB qdisc -> -> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb -> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 32kbit -> ceil 32kbit burst 2kbit -> -> # FTP traffic class -> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate -> 16kbit ceil 16kbit -> -> # sfq -> tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 -> -> # Filter FTP traffic -> tc filter ad...

Hello, I run one of my PCs as my personal router, with iptables+tc to control traffic and be my firewall. In TC, I use a combination of htb, qdisc and sfq (as well as prio) to classify bandwidth. In my current setup, I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.)

Hello I have ported OpenSSH 3.8p1 to a LynxOS platform. Recently I heard a report from the field that v2 is perceived to be significantly slower than v1. Is this a known issue? Are there any configuration parameters that can be modified to make v2 faster? Thanks in advance for your response Amba

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Guys Ive got an internet cafe on which I have a debian sarge box running. The Debian box acts as a gateway and it has masquerading on. I have 40 client PC and i do not want to assign more than 64k per pc for upload and the same is true for download too. Ive done alot of research and Ive read tutorials about CBQ and HTB. I found that CBQ.init is

Hey, one more question for ipp2p iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK

> From: Jack Moffitt [mailto:jack@icecast.org] > > So in the very near future, I don't think that there will be any > non-vorbis capable players. And for the most part, I think Vorbis will > be included in most players, though I have little hope that Microsoft > will allow Vorbis to stand side-by-side with WMA. There is a big difference between having a codec available for