search for: 2b0

...RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe48:7ce7 The 'ipsec.conf' file at Host1 and Host2 are attached along with this email.(you can refer them) IPsec is started with the following commands at both systems:(ipsec SA & SPD are set according to ipsec.conf files at both sid...

...reeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe48:7ce7 The 'ipsec.conf' file at Host1 and Host2 are attached along with this email.(you can refer them) IPsec is started with the following commands at both systems: *******at Host1******* mohan# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/setkey.sh start St...

...___ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your friends 'n family snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://in.photos.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- ########The 'ipsec.conf' file at Host2 ######### # flush configs flush ; spdflush ; # add a SAD entry add fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe48:7ce7 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 esp 0xFEAD -m transport -E 3des-cbc "ipv6readylogo3descbcout1" -A hmac-sha1 "ipv6readylogsha1out1"; add fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe48:7ce7 esp 0xFEED -m transport -E 3des-cbc "ipv6readylogo3descbcin01" -A hmac-sha1...

...[<c0164200>] Code: 8b 56 04 85 d2 79 23 68 c7 fd 22 c0 68 bc 06 00 00 68 19 fb >>EIP; c0165e69 <__journal_remove_journal_head+9/e0> <===== Trace; c01614c3 <journal_commit_transaction+343/119a> Trace; c01e93d3 <ip_rcv+313/3a0> Trace; c0164375 <kjournald+175/2b0> Trace; c01641e0 <commit_timeout+0/10> Trace; c0105726 <kernel_thread+26/30> Trace; c0164200 <kjournald+0/2b0> Code; c0165e69 <__journal_remove_journal_head+9/e0> 00000000 <_EIP>: Code; c0165e69 <__journal_remove_journal_head+9/e0> <===== 0: 8b 56...

...9 ff ff 01 44 24 04 39 eb 58 75 ec 3b 7c >>EIP; c0158b22 <__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+52/80> <===== Trace; c0156b8e <journal_commit_transaction+22e/1160> Trace; c0105813 <__switch_to+23/d0> Trace; c0111be1 <schedule+251/390> Trace; c0159983 <kjournald+173/2b0> Trace; c01597f0 <commit_timeout+0/10> Trace; c0105536 <kernel_thread+26/30> Trace; c0159810 <kjournald+0/2b0> Code; c0158b22 <__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+52/80> 00000000 <_EIP>: Code; c0158b22 <__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+52/80> <===== 0:...

...inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:b0:d0:df:e3:1d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.10.0.1/16 brd 10.10.255.255 scope global em1 inet6 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fedf:e31d/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: em2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 00:b0:d0:df:e3:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.201.1/29 brd 192.168.201.7 scope global em2 inet...

Hey! Foe example i have next code: test "should update user" do put :update, id: @user.to_param, user: @input_attributes assert_redirected_to users_path end What return id: @user.to_param? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Still trying to get it running. Updated CentOS 7, ATI video card, trying to use the radeon driver, and, using the previous kernel, X appears to come up, but gdm fails; with the 514 kernel, X fails to start. And here's a twist: I just rebooted, with radeon.modeset=1 on the kernel line... and for no reason I know of, I get *six* logs, Xorg.[0-5].log. Does this suggest anything to anyone? I

Rsync 2.5.5; transfer via ssh; sparc-sun-solaris2.5 (Ultra 1); gcc 2.8.1. Every time rsync on this box causes boundary violation. I attached two strange examples. I have a few rsync's corefiles (100MB and above) and I can examine them. I will be grateful for any help. -Mirek <-------------------------------------------------------------------------> received 966761 names done

...3d +0c ntdll.dll RtlReleasePebLock 77c09d78 +11 msvcrt.dll _initterm thread $138: 7c91da8a +a ntdll.dll NtReplyWaitReceivePortEx thread $1f4: 7c91d1fa +0a ntdll.dll NtDelayExecution 7c8023eb +4b kernel32.dll SleepEx 7c802450 +0a kernel32.dll Sleep 7c920412 +25 ntdll.dll RtlAcquirePebLock thread $2b0: <priority:15> 7c91df3a +0a ntdll.dll NtWaitForSingleObject 7c8025d5 +85 kernel32.dll WaitForSingleObjectEx 7c80253d +0d kernel32.dll WaitForSingleObject thread $4d0: <priority:15> 7c91df2a +0a ntdll.dll NtWaitForMultipleObjects 7c80956e +00 kernel32.dll WaitForMultipleObjectsEx 7c80a1...

...1B 3D 84 87 7B A9 DD 6E FC 6D 9F 76 81 ....=..{ ..n.m.v. [280] F8 25 43 73 8E 81 B4 1B 4C 41 E8 CC 3E 68 14 7B .%Cs.... LA..>h.{ [290] 58 E8 7C F0 0E D0 73 3B 73 93 75 AC 61 B8 AD 3E X.|...s; s.u.a..> [2A0] B6 55 A1 2A DA B5 55 28 18 D0 89 72 B8 FA D5 3C .U.*..U( ...r...< [2B0] C2 47 9B 21 25 28 D8 FB 37 6C 13 B0 EC 21 F3 57 .G.!%(.. 7l...!.W [2C0] 37 98 FC 0A 88 5B 23 25 C9 F9 90 55 AC FE 2F AD 7....[#% ...U../. [2D0] E0 44 2B 00 C1 BB 0C B3 9C E4 B4 47 5C 13 DD B1 .D+..... ...G\... [2E0] 78 DE 0A 4F 30 C4 7D 18 9C 48 BD D3 89 27 18 0F x..O0.}. .H...'....

...[270] 88 11 C8 14 19 02 9A 12 FA 04 0D 01 1D 00 7D 00 ........ ......}. [280] AD 11 ED 01 5E 10 08 10 B6 17 08 04 18 01 48 30 ....^... ......H0 [290] A8 00 D8 00 39 10 79 14 F9 04 4B 03 5B 10 3C 01 ....9.y. ..K.[.<. [2A0] ED 00 5E 10 8E 10 CE 10 08 0B 66 18 08 06 18 20 ..^..... ..f.... [2B0] 98 10 39 10 89 00 A9 15 EB 10 3D 01 4D 00 1E 10 ..9..... ..=.M... [2C0] 08 07 66 08 76 20 57 06 97 16 0B 20 DD 11 7E 20 ..f.v W. ... ..~ [2D0] 08 0F 06 50 47 02 57 00 38 04 88 30 79 10 B9 14 ...PG.W. 8..0y... [2E0] 2A 04 8B 03 9B 10 FB 00 7C 01 1D 01 9E 10 CE 10 *....... |....... [2F0] 08...

Hey Guys and Gals, I'm wondering if the quotas.c file is supposed to fix the problem where a Linux x86 system running with the quota software causes corrupt files to be written by Windows clients. I compiled it in and it didn't seem to make a difference for the following problem. In other words, if I enable quotas on my RH6.2 / 2.2.16-22 kernel box and then write a file via Samba/Windows

Hello everybody, just to let you know what happened in the meantime: I was able to open a Service Request at Oracle. The issue is a known bug (Bug 6742788 : assertion panic at: zfs:zap_deref_leaf) The bug has bin fixed (according to Oracle support) since build 164, but there is no fix for Solaris 11 available so far (will be fixed in S11U7?). There is a workaround available that works

..... [270] 0F 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E ...m.... c...e... [280] 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 10 ........ ........ [290] 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 ..m....c ...e.... [2A0] FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 11 00 ........ ........ [2B0] F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF .m....c. ..e..... [2C0] 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 12 00 F8 ........ ........ [2D0] 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 m....c.. .e...... [2E0] 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 13 00 F8 6D ........ .......m [2F0] C1...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking