search for: 29.35

I think there is a very similar situation with the PowerPC/Mac OS X nightly tests. Over each of the past few nights, something has been filling up the process table, causing me to be unable to log in. The nightly tester wrote out regression test and feature test logs featuring hundreds of "Resource temporarily unavailable" errors from fork(), so I assume it's the qmtest

>> I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion >> because (I believe) of an upgrade that happened on the machine (the >> qmtest >> binary doesn't work anymore?). Are you seeing a problem on freebsd where >> the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with more >> information? >> make, ~ > ps -xu

>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is >> > going >> > on >> >> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results >> section ) > > I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion > because (I

A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/ 020216.html John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error less severe? Thanks! -Brian On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Brian Gaeke wrote: > > I think there is a very

Brian Gaeke wrote: > > A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem: > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/ > 020216.html > > John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error > checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error > less severe? Does the fork bomb occur in the

Dear R helpers,   I have a ts object, dadosvar, and want to run a VAR. These are my data:   > dadosvar[1:15,]          dl    rp        igpm   ereal crescpib jurosreal  [1,] 32.31    NA 39.07  419.59       NA   7025.95  [2,] 32.00    NA 40.78  596.57       NA  13401.25  [3,] 32.70    NA 45.71  867.63       NA   7738.64  [4,] 33.22    NA 40.91 1261.36       NA  15669.95  [5,] 33.58    NA 42.58

Hi Martin, When I attended the LinuxWorld Expo in NYC back in January, I chatted with some folks at the AMD booth, as well as guys from Penguin Computing (where we bought our Opteron box). I was told that the Operton has this somewhat strange setup that the memory is controlled by one CPU. The net effect of this being that when both CPUs are running, one might only be running at around 90%

Hello R users, For the last few days I am struggling with the following task: my data.frame: A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 58.81 53.292 54.501 13.013 17.39 19.407 56.02 56.251 54.033 20.099 13.15 10.411 55.376 53.099 57.625 13.396 21.031 13.22 58.584 53.194 54.218 13.038 16.854 19.289 55.7 55.921 53.847 19.942 13.153 9.828 55.093 52.934