search for: 28224

> > I also had this verify error encoding a wav I ripped from a CD. I > didn't > > report this as it happended on flac running on debian linux > -current unstable. > > This error happened only with one track of a CD I was ripping. > > > > Another reason for me not reporting this was, that flac 1.0 running > on OpenBSD > > 2.9 encoded the wav with

...44:32 postamt dovecot: auth: Debug: master out: USER^I1^Iworkinguser^Isystem_groups_user=workinguser^Iuid=47077^Igid=100^Ihome=/home/d/w/workinguser^Imaster_user=masteruser Oct 8 13:44:32 postamt dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<workinguser>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=28224, secured So why does the masteruser login for an UNCACHED user fail? auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login disable_plaintext_auth = no auth_master_user_separator = * # fuer user*masteruser logins passdb { args = /usr/dovecot-2/etc/dovecot/dovecot.masteruser...

...list than other stuff. -8 should get within 0.01% of -9 and is pretty > reliable. I am able to reliably reproduce the -9 memory problem with one of my WAV files. I split it in two repeatedly, doing a binary search to find the smallest chunk that would trigger the problem, and I got it down to 28224 samples (this is a 44.1/16bit/stereo file, so about 0.5 seconds). I have put the file up at <http://people.debian.org/~mdz/flac-test-case-1.wav>. Here is a gdb backtrace at the point where it is allocating gobs of memory: (gdb) bt #0 0x400ba565 in memset () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x805f7...

Hello list, I have a problem with users changing their password from the command line of the localhost with smbpasswd. As root the whole thing works fine but not as a normal user. First I had the connection to the localhost refused because I didn't list localhost at the interfaces and had "bind interfaces only" set to yes. (manual smb.conf) I fixed that and added localhost.

...DAP service. So, the question is, is it possible having a Win2K8 as a DC controller in a samba4 environment? Is safe? Has anybody experienced with this scenario? -- I?igo Martinez Lasala Vector Ignite Parque Empresarial Cerro de Los Gamos Camino del Cerro de los Gamos, 1, Edificio 6, Planta 1 28224 Pozuelo de Alarc?n - Madrid www.vector-itcgroup.com

...postamt dovecot: auth: Debug: master out: USER^I1^Iworkinguser^Isystem_groups_user=workinguser^Iuid=47077^Igid=100^Ihome=/home/d/w/workinguser^Imaster_user=masteruser > Oct 8 13:44:32 postamt dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<workinguser>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=28224, secured > > So why does the masteruser login for an UNCACHED user fail? Right now I'm having a hard time migrating my users because the masteruser login fails. Anybody? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin Campus Benj...

...le not found. NUT search disabled. No start IP, skipping NUT bus (old connect method) Scanning NUT simulation devices. [root at mythtv ~]# cd /usr/lib64 [root at mythtv lib64]# ll libusb* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4 -> libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28224 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0 -> libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 119760 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 24 2024 libusbmuxd-2.0.so.6 -> libusbmuxd-2.0.so.6.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root...

...0.01% of -9 and > > is pretty > > reliable. > > I am able to reliably reproduce the -9 memory problem with one of my > WAV files. > I split it in two repeatedly, doing a binary search to find the > smallest chunk > that would trigger the problem, and I got it down to 28224 samples > (this is a > 44.1/16bit/stereo file, so about 0.5 seconds). I have put the file > up at > <http://people.debian.org/~mdz/flac-test-case-1.wav>. Here is a gdb > backtrace > at the point where it is allocating gobs of memory: I think I see the problem just from th...

Hi everybody. One month ago me migrated from samba 3.6 classic domain to samba4. After solving some minor problems, we have found ourselves with a ACL corruption and we don't know how to deal with this. When accesing to our sysvol shared (for example, \\domain.local\sysvol) from both Samba or Windows clients, we are refused to connect. Domain=[VECTORSF] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.4]

...isabled. >No start IP, skipping NUT bus (old connect method) >Scanning NUT simulation devices. > >[root at mythtv ~]# cd /usr/lib64 >[root at mythtv lib64]# ll libusb* >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4 -> libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28224 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0 -> libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 119760 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 24 2024 libusbmuxd-2.0.so.6 -> libusbmuxd-2.0.so.6.0.0 >-rwxr-xr-...

Missing features from memory from following this mailinglist: - Win7 join to AD still requires two registry changes. - SYSVOL is not replicated, use a cronjob with rsync. - Domain-Trust works only in one direction (which one?). - winbind does not work on DCs, use a separate file server. - Joining an AD requires one of its DCs in the same subnet? - Cluster filesystems destroy TDB files, use CTDB. -

I have a domain that I upgraded from a Samba 3/LDAP set up about a year ago. I haven't done anything too interesting with it and it's generally been working OK. I attempted to create a new GPO for my domain. From a Win 7 client I get an error "This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object". Thinking this was an issue with sysvol acls, I ran "samba-tool

...pping NUT bus (old connect method) > Scanning NUT simulation devices. > > [root at mythtv ~]# cd /usr/lib64 > [root at mythtv lib64]# ll libusb* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4 -> > libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28224 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0 -> > libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 119760 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 24 2024 libusbmuxd-2.0.so.6 -> > libusbmuxd-2.0.so....

...ethod) >> Scanning NUT simulation devices. >> >> [root at mythtv ~]# cd /usr/lib64 >> [root at mythtv lib64]# ll libusb* >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4 -> >> libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28224 Jan 24 2024 libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0 -> >> libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 119760 May 7 2024 libusb-1.0.so.0.4.0 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 24 2024 libusbmuxd-2.0.so.6 -> >>...

Great! Regarding libusb and nut-scanner, I think the *.so (exact) symlinks are part of *-devel packages. This was solved in NUT recently (maybe after 2.8.2 release already) by detecting and stashing the basename of realpath of the library present during build, so the exact *.so.X.Y.Z would be also tried. Also, nut-scanner now (in 2.8.2 IIRC) should not suggest the volatile bus/busport/device

...7, 5, effective(0, 513), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:show_msg(454) [2005/12/22 09:46:07, 5, effective(0, 513), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:show_msg(464) size=100 smb_com=0x32 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=1 smb_pid=1692 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=28224 smt_wct=15 smb_vwv[ 0]= 32 (0x20) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 2]= 2 (0x2) smb_vwv[ 3]= 40 (0x28) smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 6]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 7]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 8]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[ 9]= 32 (0x20) smb_vwv[1...