search for: 27m

...cant. all i need to do is make a contour plot for a friend but after weeks i feel like giving up.. i included the first few lines of the file.. any help will be great Thanks Hannes http://www.nabble.com/file/p24777697/small.txt small.txt -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/i%27m-so-stuck-with-text-file-and-contour-plot-tp24777697p24777697.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...I''ve ascertained that by the time I''m in operator=~, all that''s left is ''%%''. Is there something obvious I''ve missed about this straightforward variable interpolation? TIA -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ez_where-%3A-i%27m-puzzled-t1455038.html#a3932303 Sent from the RubyOnRails Users forum at Nabble.com.

...about it, and the best way is to read the monograph, and "Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns" (2nd edt.) is a better choise. But I can not find it anywhere I can. Who can help me? Thank you! ----- unangu at gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I%27m-looking-for-a-book-about-spatial-point-patterns-%28Diggle%2C2003%29-tp21395908p21395908.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...ckprop, ...) ? Also, it seems that the R nnet "decay" parameter in nnet corresponds to the "learning_rate" parameter in FANN. Correct ? Many thanks in advance ! Luc Moulinier IGBMC Strasbourg -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/nnet-library-and-FANN-package%27m-tp24641150p24641150.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...; into SLEB. Attached is an updated patch which toggles the change at the > module level (done with option a), and uses signed VRBs for phis, This is awesome! I tried it by creating a .ll of all of clang. Some sizes: * clang.ll 490M * clang.ll.gz 55M * clang.ll.bz2 37M * clang.ll.xz 27M with the current bitcode: * clang.bc 82M * clang.bc.xz 27M with the new bitcode: * clang.bc 70M * clang.bc.xz 26M it looks like a nop run of opt also got a bit faster, from 10.451s to 10.176s. +static void EmitSignedInt64(SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &Vals, uint64_t V) { Please s...

...] last pid: 1102; load averages: 0.02, 0.08, 0.07 up 0+00:09:37 21:39:13 162 processes: 4 running, 145 sleeping, 13 waiting CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.6% idle Mem: 60M Active, 19M Inact, 54M Wired, 56K Cache, 27M Buf, 3809M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 12 root 1 171 ki31 0K 16K RUN 0 8:59 97.90% idle: cpu0 11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 16K RUN 1 8:57 95.80% idle: cpu1 1102 root 1 -8...

Hi, Lately I''ve been visiting the RoR API site quite often, so I modified a Firefox search plugin to make searches to it (with Google). So here I post it in case someone finds it useful: <SEARCH version = "7.1" name="Google - RoR API" description="RoR API SiteSearch" method="GET"

...such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/task/3662/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/fd/4': No such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory 14G var 1.8G usr 278M lib 77M boot 31M etc 27M lib64 15M sbin 7.8M bin 188K dev 112K root Why *df -h* is reporting 24G used? Where the space did go? How I can fix this?

...Users logging in through sshd: xxxxxx: c-71-197-66-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (71.197.66.21): 1 time ---------------------- SSHD End ------------------------- ------------------ Disk Space -------------------- /dev/md1 366G 28G 320G 9% / /dev/md0 99M 27M 67M 29% /boot ###################### LogWatch End #########################

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Jan Voung <jvoung at chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is > one simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. > See this spreadsheet for some rough

News to me. Probably worth considering when choosing your deployment options. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/09/salesforce_why_buy_heroku/print.html Dreamforce 2010 Why would a company that spent 10 years delivering CRM as a service drop $212m in cash and $27m in stock on a 30-person startup that hosts Ruby on Rails apps for devs on Amazon? Salesforce.com vice president of technology and co-founder Parker Harris was initially, oddly vague on Wednesday when explaining why his company just bought three-year-old Heroku. During a Q&A with press and ana...

I came in this morning to find all the servers all locked up solid: # passenger-status ----------- General information ----------- max = 20 count = 20 active = 20 inactive = 0 Waiting on global queue: 236 ----------- Domains ----------- /etc/puppet/rack: PID: 2720 Sessions: 1 Processed: 939 Uptime: 9h 22m 18s PID: 1615 Sessions: 1 Processed: 947 Uptime: 9h 23m

...onsole' to pop back as a remote terminal and so pay its space penalty, but comment it out here) As I said, I 'went hunting' and trimmed it down to 465 M ; more savings are possible. The worst remaining mandatory 'size offenders' in the install are: glibc-common 42M perl 27M kernel 22M Not much more we can do there. But ... Once the install is done, turn off auditting: chkconfig audit off service audit stop and reclaim the LARGE (100M) amout of room these files eat up cd /var/log/audit.d/ rm -f * Unfortunately the package is not deletable as there are depen...

...LVM and into /proc. To do that, you?d need to say ?du -hsx /?, but then you don?t get the results you want. Instead, I?d recommend just explicitly listing the most likely pigs: /usr, /var, /home, and /etc. > 14G var > 1.8G usr > 278M lib > 77M boot > 31M etc > 27M lib64 > 15M sbin > 7.8M bin > 188K dev > 112K root I see about 16 GiB. > Why *df -h* is reporting 24G used? Where the space did go? How I can fix > this? 24 - 16 = 8, which sounds suspiciously like the size of a swap file. What does mount say?

...in dsync and a couple of other unrelated bugs, everything seemed to work correctly and transparently. UIDs and everything was preserved as expected. I think I even feel my mail clients being faster than with mbox :) ~% du --exclude=.imap -bsh mail-old-mbox 707M mail-old-mbox ~% du -bsh mdbox/* 27M mdbox/mailboxes 704M mdbox/storage The reason why I'm giving -b is because without it, mdbox was a lot larger than mbox (734 MB vs. 710 MB). I guess this is because zfs internally decided to waste some space for the files. ~/mdbox/storage% ls -lS -rw------- 1 tss tss 13602413 2010-01-2...

Hi I have successfully deployed winbindd in redhatlinux 7.1 os. It worked fine for a couple of days and boom the server locked up. i restarted it and winbindd crashed (i think). i restarted winbindd again and it's never been the same again. My users connect to the drive now but at a very slow speed. Also when I try to move large file form snap server to the linux server i get this error

...searches are most unhelpful as they all seem to offer assistance in getting LDAP to work, which I am not interested in. Can anyone please tell me how to tell samba not to try and talk to an LDAP server? Thanx -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/LDAP-server-unavailable---but-I%27m-not-using-LDAP-tp26227611p26227611.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...BOX.Altert 28K ./.INBOX.notifs 36K ./.BOITE_RECEPTION 36K ./.PIGE 80K ./dovecot 428K ./.Drafts 728K ./.Alert Process 1020K ./.Trash 1.3M ./.Junk 3.4M ./cur 3.6M ./.Alert BLANC 7.5M ./.Alert PUB 9.7M ./.IT SUPPORT 9.9M ./.GLPI 12M ./.REGIE 15M ./.LTO 27M ./.VDN 29M ./.Sent 43M ./.HD SUPPORT 105M ./.MAM 105M ./.PRTG 514M ./.INBOX 883M . root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] /var/vmail/domain.tld/m.stefan # cat maildirsize 1073741824S 1098898439 9380 -382366814 -439 382 1 27713 1 -383309268 -489 27433 1 4274 1 27740 1 31452 1 -6657...

...king the directories shows they're apparently rebuilt: [08:09:15][root at greer]/home/stan/mail/.imap/1-Spam-l$ la total 28M drwx------ 2 stan stan 4.0K Feb 23 07:41 . drwx------ 35 stan stan 4.0K Feb 15 11:14 .. -rw------- 1 stan stan 358K Feb 23 07:18 dovecot.index -rw------- 1 stan stan 27M Feb 23 07:41 dovecot.index.cache -rw------- 1 stan stan 616 Feb 23 07:41 dovecot.index.log What do I need to check/change/do to get these search times back down to reasonable/respectable levels, i.e. around 10s? Thanks. -- Stan

I am using dovecot lmtp root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # grep virtual_transport /etc/postfix/main.cf # transport_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/transport-mailman, proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf # virtual_transport = maildrop virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # On Thursday, February 9, 2017 7:54 PM, WJCarpenter