search for: 26gb

Hi All: I have an HP DL380G5 server which I am loading CentOS 6.2 on and it does not appear to recognize all of the RAM installed on the server. The BIOS is reporting 26GB however top is reporting: Mem: 15720140k total, 418988k used, 15301152k free, 30256k buffers Swap: 17956856k total, 0k used, 17956856k free, 135536k cached and free is reporting: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 15720140 418848 15301292 0...

Hi all. I have a 50 GB OCFS2 file system. I'm currently using ~26GB of space but df is reporting 43 GB used. Any ideas how to find out where the missing 17GB is at? The file system was formatted with a 16K cluster & 4K block size. Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/piperm...

When i am installing my Exe file it tells me there is not enough free space on Drive C, i have been into Wine File manager and i have 26GB free on C:\, this is confusing but i am slightly new to all this, can anyone help? Ta Very Much Chris

...on. I try to do microarray normalization by R. I use justRMA function within affy package, got error about segment fault. I don't know why it happen. I attached error below. Please help me. Thank you. Cheers, Won ======================= OS : Redhat linux Cpu : intel xeon X5570 Memory : 26Gb & OS : Ubuntu Cpu : intel q6600 Memory : 8Gb ======================= Loading required package: Biobase Loading required package: methods Welcome to Bioconductor Vignettes contain introductory material. To view, type 'browseVignettes()'. To cite Bioconductor, see 'citation...

Guys, The other day while working on my old workstation it get frozen and after reboot I lost almost all data unexpectedly. I have a RAID1 configuration with LVM. 2 IDE HDDs. md0 .. store /boot (100MB) -------------------------- /dev/hda2 /dev/hdd1 md1 .. store / (26GB) /dev/hda3 /dev/hdd2 The only info that still rest in was that, that I restore after the fresh install. It seems that the disk were with problems and weren't syncing :(. I confessed, I didn't check that at first time but after I lost the data and check /var/log/messages I saw that. >Fr...

Guys, The other day while working on my old workstation it got frozen and after reboot I lost almost all data unexpectedly. I have a RAID1 configuration with LVM. 2 IDE HDDs. md0 .. store /boot (100MB) -------------------------- /dev/hda2 /dev/hdd1 md1 .. store / (26GB) -------------------------- /dev/hda3 /dev/hdd2 The only info that still rest in was that, that I restore after the fresh install. It seems that the disk were with problems and weren't syncing :(. I confessed, I didn't check that at first time but after I lost the data and check /var/log/m...

...ess and delete files from that folder over the Samba share. But I can not add files to that directory over the share (what I can do on the Linux box). The Windows Explorer says that the directory has 0 bytes of free space and that the total space is 20MB. The total free space should be around 26GB. I think that the problem is Samba. A cfs directory can only be accessed by the user who set it up. Even root won't see anything. Samba will access the dir with user priviliges but tries to read the disk-free info as user root or samba or whatever but not as user. So it will always be 0 bec...

...boot a.ka. xl destroy + xl create is the only way to get it back. This *could* be related to "[Xen-devel] qemu-system-i386: memory leak?" http://xen.markmail.org/message/chqpifrj46lxdxx2 DomU by themselves doesn’t use any abnormal memory or swap. To give an overview, currently Dom0 uses 26GB of swap with 8 active domU. Swap per process: Pid Swap Process Uptime 3766 98452 kB qemu-dm -d 29 -domain-name [hostname] -nographic -M xenpv 160 days 6100 276988 kB qemu-dm -d 42 -domain-name [hostname] -nographic -M xenpv 108 days 6790 121620 kB qemu-dm -d 46 -domain-n...

..., I don''t see the performance degradation. It doesn''t make sense that this would help unless there is some cache/VM pollution resulting from the open(2). The basic situation is that there are 8 SAS applications running a statistical procedure. The 8 applications read the same 26GB file but each writes its own unique 41GB output file (using vanilla read(2)/write(2) of 4K/8K/16K I/O sizes). All I/O going to the same mirrored ZFS filesystem. The performance problem occurs only if the 41 GB output files exist. In this situation, SAS will open the file to be overwritten fo...

...low. ThinLTO has enabled much broader adoption of whole program optimization, by making it non-monolithic. * For Chromium builds, https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/695714/3/build/toolcha in/concurrent_links.gni, the linker process memory is set to 10GB with ThinLTO. It was 26GB with Full LTO before that and individual processes will run of out of memory beyond that. * Here, https://gotocon.com/dl/goto-chicago-2016/slides/AysyluGreenberg_BuildingADistrib utedBuildSystemAtGoogleScale.pdf, a distributed build system at Google scale is shown where 5 million binary and test b...

I came across this benchmark between Xapian & Solr: http://www.anur.ag/blog/2009/03/xapian-and-solr/ According to the benchmark, a doc set that took Solr 34 min to index took Xapian 7 hours. Solr's index is also much smaller - 2.5GB to Xapian's 8.9GB. I'm new to Xapian. Just wondering if results like these are typical? Is indexing speed & size a known issue in Xapian? Or is

...ark CPUs. Trunk includes SKB rx frag coalescing. net-next w/ virtio_net before 2613af0ed18a (PAGE_SIZE bufs): 14642.85Gb/s net-next (MTU-size bufs): 13170.01Gb/s net-next + auto-tune: 14555.94Gb/s Jason Wang also reported a throughput increase on mlx4 from 22Gb/s using MTU-sized buffers to about 26Gb/s using auto-tuning. Signed-off-by: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> --- v2->v3: Remove per-receive queue metadata ring. Encode packet buffer base address and truesize into an unsigned long by requiring a minimum packet size alignment of 256. Permit attempts to fill...

...3_build_toolcha&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=4c9jZ8ZwYXlxUZHyw4Wing&m=BOTyGbKXpK1kdAvdQF0QoVsl4A5BCIQJMEEXJRVW6To&s=8EBzmSqxfeVJXXXFKkx4Mzkf5d6cucxPc9pXkF36v_o&e=> > in/concurrent_links.gni, the linker process memory is set to 10GB with > ThinLTO. > It was 26GB with Full LTO before that and individual processes will run of > out > of memory beyond that. > > * Here, > > https://gotocon.com/dl/goto-chicago-2016/slides/AysyluGreenberg_BuildingADistrib > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gotocon.com_dl_goto-2Dchicag...

...ark CPUs. Trunk includes SKB rx frag coalescing. net-next w/ virtio_net before 2613af0ed18a (PAGE_SIZE bufs): 14642.85Gb/s net-next (MTU-size bufs): 13170.01Gb/s net-next + auto-tune: 14555.94Gb/s Jason Wang also reported a throughput increase on mlx4 from 22Gb/s using MTU-sized buffers to about 26Gb/s using auto-tuning. Signed-off-by: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> --- v2: Add per-receive queue metadata ring to track precise truesize for mergeable receive buffers. Remove all truesize approximation. Never try to fill a full RX ring (required for metadata ring in v2). d...

Is there large value from deferring the block ordering to link time? That is, does the block layout algorithm need to consider global layout issues when deciding which blocks to put together and which to relegate to the far-away part of the code? Or, could the propellor-optimized compile step instead split each function into only 2 pieces -- one containing an "optimally-ordered" set of

...3_build_toolcha&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=4c9jZ8ZwYXlxUZHyw4Wing&m=BOTyGbKXpK1kdAvdQF0QoVsl4A5BCIQJMEEXJRVW6To&s=8EBzmSqxfeVJXXXFKkx4Mzkf5d6cucxPc9pXkF36v_o&e=> > in/concurrent_links.gni, the linker process memory is set to 10GB with > ThinLTO. > It was 26GB with Full LTO before that and individual processes will run of > out > of memory beyond that. > > * Here, > > https://gotocon.com/dl/goto-chicago-2016/slides/AysyluGreenberg_BuildingADistrib > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gotocon.com_dl_goto-2Dchicag...

skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation

skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation

...rag coalescing. > > net-next w/ virtio_net before 2613af0ed18a (PAGE_SIZE bufs): 14642.85Gb/s > net-next (MTU-size bufs): 13170.01Gb/s > net-next + auto-tune: 14555.94Gb/s > > Jason Wang also reported a throughput increase on mlx4 from 22Gb/s > using MTU-sized buffers to about 26Gb/s using auto-tuning. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> > --- > v2: Add per-receive queue metadata ring to track precise truesize for > mergeable receive buffers. Remove all truesize approximation. Never > try to fill a full RX ring (required...

...rag coalescing. > > net-next w/ virtio_net before 2613af0ed18a (PAGE_SIZE bufs): 14642.85Gb/s > net-next (MTU-size bufs): 13170.01Gb/s > net-next + auto-tune: 14555.94Gb/s > > Jason Wang also reported a throughput increase on mlx4 from 22Gb/s > using MTU-sized buffers to about 26Gb/s using auto-tuning. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> > --- > v2: Add per-receive queue metadata ring to track precise truesize for > mergeable receive buffers. Remove all truesize approximation. Never > try to fill a full RX ring (required...