search for: 256gib

...n in the kernel. There are roughly 2^48 different MAC addresses, further limited by the rhashtable they are stored in to 2^31. Each entry is of the type struct net_bridge_fdb_entry, which is currently 128 bytes big. This means the maximum amount of memory allocated for FDB entries is 2^31 * 128B = 256GiB, which is too much for most computers. Mitigate this by adding a bridge netlink setting IFLA_BR_FDB_MAX_ENTRIES, which, if nonzero, limits the amount of entries to a user specified maximum. For backwards compatibility the default setting of 0 disables the limit. All changes to fdb_n_entries are...

Hello What is the largest file size that can be created on Linux ? is there any limitation ? Thanks

...ere are roughly 2^48 different MAC addresses, further limited by the > rhashtable they are stored in to 2^31. Each entry is of the type struct > net_bridge_fdb_entry, which is currently 128 bytes big. This means the > maximum amount of memory allocated for FDB entries is 2^31 * 128B = > 256GiB, which is too much for most computers. > > Mitigate this by adding a bridge netlink setting IFLA_BR_FDB_MAX_ENTRIES, > which, if nonzero, limits the amount of entries to a user specified > maximum. > > For backwards compatibility the default setting of 0 disables the limit. >...

...n in the kernel. There are roughly 2^48 different MAC addresses, further limited by the rhashtable they are stored in to 2^31. Each entry is of the type struct net_bridge_fdb_entry, which is currently 128 bytes big. This means the maximum amount of memory allocated for FDB entries is 2^31 * 128B = 256GiB, which is too much for most computers. Mitigate this by adding a bridge netlink setting IFLA_BR_FDB_MAX_LEARNED_ENTRIES, which, if nonzero, limits the amount of learned entries to a user specified maximum. For backwards compatibility the default setting of 0 disables the limit. User-added entrie...

...e, 15-100% backup, dataloss is hassle. 4. Power-Enthusiast: 100% Speed, Backup? -- Can you eat that? 5. "Walmart" and Co: some speed, some use time, dataloss is your problem. (Prices are for Europe, Germany, online buy) The "Samsung SSD 850 Pro" with 10year warranty, 2. group, 256GiB ~ 125? The "Samsung SSD 850 Evo" with 5 year warranty, 3. group, 250GiB ~ 90? The "Corsair Neutron XTi" with 5 year warranty, 3. group, 240GiB ~ 100? The "Corsair Force LE" with 3 year warranty, 5. group, 240GiB ~ 70? >From the user standpoint, the difference...

...is hassle. > 4. Power-Enthusiast: 100% Speed, Backup? -- Can you eat that? > 5. "Walmart" and Co: some speed, some use time, dataloss is your problem. > > (Prices are for Europe, Germany, online buy) > > The "Samsung SSD 850 Pro" with 10year warranty, 2. group, 256GiB ~ 125? > The "Samsung SSD 850 Evo" with 5 year warranty, 3. group, 250GiB ~ 90? > The "Corsair Neutron XTi" with 5 year warranty, 3. group, 240GiB ~ 100? > The "Corsair Force LE" with 3 year warranty, 5. group, 240GiB ~ 70? > > From the user standpo...

On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >> For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >> - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >> - You can't buy it new anymore (discontinued) >> - There are more reliable drives available. >> >> I'd go for a Samsung Evo 850, that

Introduce a limit on the amount of learned FDB entries on a bridge, configured by netlink with a build time default on bridge creation in the kernel config. For backwards compatibility the kernel config default is disabling the limit (0). Without any limit a malicious actor may OOM a kernel by spamming packets with changing MAC addresses on their bridge port, so allow the bridge creator to limit