search for: 211mb

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "211mb".

Did you mean: 11mb
2012 Mar 06
1
kickstart partitioning and cylinder boundary
...Parted 2.1 Using /dev/sda Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) p Model: Adaptec OS (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 1999GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 211MB 210MB primary ext2 boot 2 211MB 537GB 537GB primary ext4 3 537GB 554GB 17.2GB primary linux-swap(v1) 4 554GB 1999GB 1445GB primary ext4 Yet, fdisk ?l report: Disk /dev/sda: 1999.3 GB, 1999307276288 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243068 cylin...
2013 Aug 05
2
problem configuring grub for a dual-boot
...2 374MB 1000GB 1000GB primary ntfs (parted) select /dev/sdb Using /dev/sdb (parted) print Model: ATA ST500DM002-1BD14 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 500GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 211MB 210MB fat16 boot 2 211MB 735MB 524MB ext4 3 735MB 500GB 499GB lvm /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.conf looks like this: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: Yo...
2006 Jan 12
1
Extended Attribute Write Performance
Hello, I'm writing an application that makes pretty extensive use of extended attributes to store file attributes on Ext2. I used a profiling tool developed by my colleague Nikolai Joukov at SUNY Stony Brook to dig a bit deeper into the performance of my application. In the course of my benchmark, there are 54247 setxattr operations during a 54 seconds. They use about 10.56 seconds of the
2012 Dec 05
0
some confusion about SR and PBD and ...
...W" ... next I did was checking the data rate, so I wrote a file with 4G in size (with dd) to the disk. One to the disk created for the SR and one to a disk one "abstraction layer" lower (or obove ? ... whatever ... :) ). The difference was quite noticable ~175MB/s on the SR disk and ~211MB/s one layer lower... Hm... I did some searching, but this seems to be the normal way... So my question: Is it somehow possible to attach an LV to be used (and managed) by XEN as a SR more directly (instead of having it create this whole bunch of virtulization-thingies...) Because I didn''...