search for: 211

...) exten => 313,n,GotoIfTime(8:00-16:00|mon-fri|*|*?313,8) exten => 313,n,Playback(callcentar/rvnjemacki,skip) exten => 313,n,VoiceMail,u221 exten => 313,n,Hangup exten => 313,n,VoiceMail,b221 exten => 313,n,Hangup And this is how it looks on CLI. -- Executing Goto("SIP/211-793f", "callcentre|313|1") in new stack -- Goto (callcentre,313,1) -- Executing Answer("SIP/211-793f", "") in new stack -- Executing Set("SIP/211-793f", "LANGUAGE()=de") in new stack -- Executing Playback("SIP/211-793f&quot...

...th 3 NICs. I set up the linux server as the below. As the result, it works fine( 192.168.0.x can access the internet by masquerading via eth2 and external internet can access the eth1 and eth2). But the problem is that the hosts in the local network (192.168.0.x) can not access the ip addresses of 211.x.x.155(eth2) and 218.x.x.20(eth1), even though ip forwarding is turned on. It can only ping and access via 192.168.0.1(IP of eth0) Could someone please sugguested me the solutions? Thanks in advance. My environment ans settings: Local Network +-------------+ eth1(218.x.x.20) --> ISP1 (19...

...is that the server is not sending the actual data to any clients. To find out more about what is going on, I increased icecast's log level to 4 to see debug data in error.log. And here's what it shows: [2011-02-28 00:48:32] DBUG stats/modify_node_event update node total_bytes_sent (211) [2011-02-28 00:48:37] DBUG stats/modify_node_event update node total_bytes_read (79572713) [2011-02-28 00:48:37] DBUG stats/modify_node_event update node total_bytes_sent (211) [2011-02-28 00:48:38] DBUG slave/_slave_thread checking master stream list [2011-02-28 00:48:42] DBUG stats/modif...

...X configuration file name. Option 210: pxelinux.pathprefix (text) Specifies the PXELINUX common path prefix, instead of deriving it from the boot file name. This almost certainly needs to end in whatever character the TFTP server OS uses as a pathname separator, e.g. slash (/) for Unix. Option 211: pxelinux.reboottime (unsigned integer 32 bits) Specifies, in seconds, the approximate time to wait before reboot in the event of TFTP failure. 0 means wait forever (in reality, it waits approximately 136 years.) ---------- Out of these, option 208 is strictly use as a safety and is obviously...

Hi: This should be easy. I'm running 1.2.15. When a caller calls someone's voice mail, it goes straight to a beep, even though there is an unavail.wav file in that user's voice mail directory. Here is the relevant part of extensions.conf: [internal] exten => 2211,1,Dial(SIP/211,10) exten => 2211,2,VoiceMail(u211@default) exten => 2211,3,Hangup Here is the relevant part of voicemail.conf: [default] 211 => 5555,Mr Test,test@internal.com Here's what I see in the console: > -- Executing Dial("SIP/210-081990b0", "SIP/211|10&...

...;Address 0x6d6f7250 out of bounds>) at cli.c:1364 argv = {0x8137cc0 "reload", 0x8137cc7 "app_queue.so", 0x0, 0x8227d68 " ;\"\b????: 2007-01-03 15:17:39.165755\r\n", 0xbddfa49c "h???????h}\"\bh}\"\b&", 0xb7dc3fea "?\234\211<$????\213]?\213u?\213}?\211?]?????U\211?\203?(\211]?\211u?\211}???C??\201??\237\n", 0xb7e6fa00 "", 0x8227d68 " ;\"\b????: 2007-01-03 15:17:39.165755\r\n", 0xb7e6dff4 "\034?\020", 0x26 <Address 0x26 out of bounds>, 0x27 <Address 0x27 out of b...

...0x85e43f8 "", literal_size = 602996366068564984, list = {arr = {buffer = 0x85e43f8, element_size = 140396032}, v = 0x85e43f8, v_modifiable = 0x85e43f8}}, literal8 = 0} (gdb) p args[42] $43 = {type = 140367432, parent = 0x85d7490, str_len = 4835952, _data = {str = 0x4f2c30 "U\211?S\203?\004\213E\b??\034??\201?e?\006", literal_size = 21798367781661744, list = {arr = {buffer = 0x4f2c30, element_size = 5075328}, v = 0x4f2c30, v_modifiable = 0x4f2c30}}, literal8 = 0} (gdb) p args[43] $44 = {type = 5214864, parent = 0x4f9570, str_len = 5086624, _data = {str = 0x...

...connections, so its getting to the server. I am getting the following errors: moe*CLI> <-- SIP read from 10.4.5.6:5061: REGISTER sip:10.4.6.4 SIP/2.0 CSeq: 1 REGISTER Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.4.5.6:5061;branch=z9hG4bK4e847b36-8663-db11-81de-000e7beef61c;rport User-Agent: Ekiga/2.0.1 From: <sip:211@10.4.6.4>;tag=86747b36-8663-db11-81de-000e7beef61c Call-ID: b22a7b36-8663-db11-81de-000e7beef61c@dailyplanet To: <sip:211@10.4.6.4> Contact: <sip:211@10.4.5.6:5061;transport=udp> Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, REGISTER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE Expires: 3600 Conte...

I have googled this to death, and all I get are reference to the MoH needing a Zaptel timing source, and then people saying no they don't any more. -- Set Response Timeout to 2 -- Executing BackGround("SIP/211-57ba", "my-greeting") in new stack -- Playing 'my-greeting' (language 'en') == CDR updated on SIP/211-57ba -- Executing MusicOnHold("SIP/211-57ba", "") in new stack -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/211-57ba...

...Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/recordingcheck recordingcheck|20090513-092729|1242196049.184: Inbound recording enabled. recordingcheck|20090513-092729|1242196049.184: CALLFILENAME=1242196049.184 -- AGI Script recordingcheck completed, returning 0 -- Executing Monitor("Local/211 at from-internal-b759,2", "wav49|1242196049.184| mb") in new stack -- Executing Macro("Local/211 at from-internal-b759,2", "dial|30|Ttr|211") in new stack -- Executing AGI("Local/211 at from-internal-b759,2", "dialparties.agi") in new stack...

...DN/5-u299 [2008-02-11 16:02:33] VERBOSE[6543] logger.c: Extension Changed 240 new state Idle for Notify User 201 [2008-02-11 16:02:40] VERBOSE[22205] logger.c: -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on mISDN/5-u299 [2008-02-11 16:02:42] VERBOSE[22215] logger.c: -- Executing [211 at default:1] Dial("SIP/201-0872f2c0", "SIP/211|20|tWwTkK") in new stack [2008-02-11 16:02:42] VERBOSE[6543] logger.c: Extension Changed 211 new state Ringing for Notify User 201 [2008-02-11 16:02:42] VERBOSE[22215] logger.c: -- Called 211 [2008-02-11 16:02:42] VERBOSE[222...

...te.pem \ --install-script=puppet-enterprise \ --installer-payload=/usr/local/puppet/puppet-2.7.0.tar.gz \ --installer-answers=/usr/local/puppet/agent.txt \ --keyname icos-client \ --type t1.micro Node is created & puppet is also installed but i am getting errors as below. [root@ip-10-224-122-211 tmp]# puppet node_aws bootstrap \ > --region us-east-1 \ > --image ami-cc5af9a5 \ > --login root \ > --keyfile /root/.ssh/private.pem \ > --install-script=puppet-enterprise \ > --installer-payload=/usr/local/puppet/puppet-2.7.0.tar.gz \ > --installer-answers=/usr/local/puppet/a...

...h_arg_init (args=0x8602500, arg=0x86025d0, > change_uidsets=true, search_saved_uidset=0x85e0e7c) at mail-search.c:72 > _data_stack_cur_id = 4 > thread_args = <value optimized out> > keywords = {0xbfe82b78 "?+?o\231F", 0x46b936 > "\204?u?\211?\204?u?\203?\020^_]?\213E\b\211?\213P\b\213@\f?\004$\001"} > __FUNCTION__ = "mail_search_arg_init" > #12 0x0046996f in mail_search_args_init (args=0x8602500, > box=0x85e4418, change_uidsets=true, search_saved_uidset=0x85e0e7c) at > mail-search.c:142 >...

> From: George Lin [mailto:glin@cosini.com] > > I want to deploy multiple SIPs phone in our office. And we have shutdown > the > firewall at our office router(with ip 211.x.x.x). we have deployed the > asterisk with IP 218.x.x.x. > > All SIP phones have 192.x.x.x. We have something similar George, * sits outside the firewall with a registered IP address, the SIP phones sit behind the firewall with 172.16.x.x addresses. > When the SIP phone is power on...

...ket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVLOWAT = 1 [2002/10/25 15:17:53, 5] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDTIMEO = 0 [2002/10/25 15:17:53, 5] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVTIMEO = 0 [2002/10/25 15:17:53, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1211) open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. [2002/10/25 15:17:53, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(813) bind succeeded on port 0 [2002/10/25 15:17:53, 3] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(298) Linux kernel oplocks enabled [2002/10/25 15:17:53, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(124...

...spatial = F, nit=100000, thinnin=100, path.mcmc="./") >PostProcessChain(path.mcmc="./", nxdom=100, nydom=100, burnin=200) I have an 8 cores computer, and since I have to compute that bit on a thousand of line like that : 209 209 217 217 180 180 154 154 181 181 192 192 -9 -9 211 211 -9 -9 160 160 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 254 254 140 140 181 181 -9 -9 -9 -9 211 211 158 158 160 160 158 146 209 209 223 223 348 348 186 186 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 154 154 146 146 212 212 291 291 218 218 170 170 187 187 194 194 190 190 214 208 152 152 158 158 155 155 209 209 -9 -9 180 180 150 150...

...gt; --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--c > ??????? fbox = 0x55945fe7f798 > ??????? box = 0x55945fe7efa8 > ??????? autoindex = false > ??????? ret = 0 > ??????? error = 0x7f1654813665 <p_strdup_vprintf+90> > "H\213E\350\353\067\213E\344\211\302H\213E\330H\211\326H\211\307\350\301\367\377\377H\211E\360\213E\344\203\350\001\211\302H\213M\350H\213E\360H\211\316H\211\307\350\302\357\354\377H\213E\360H\213M\370dH3\f%(" > #12 0x00007f165469b83e in quota_mailbox_transaction_commit > (ctx=0x55945fe88820, changes_r=0x7fff1b28d2c0) a...

...out the computation of the improve of a split. The following is an extract of an output of the summary of a tree: Node number 1: 600 observations, complexity param=0.007272727 predicted class=0 expected loss=0.1666667 class counts: 500 100 probabilities: 0.833 0.167 left son=2 (211 obs) right son=3 (389 obs) Primary splits: x4 < 0.5 to the left, improve=1.2284910, (0 missing) x1 < 1.5 to the left, improve=0.9729730, (0 missing) x10 < 1.5 to the right, improve=0.8371014, (0 missing) Node number 2: 211 observations, complexity param=0.006666...

...  Also i have an windows client where ~80-100 Users login that will also happen   2. I?m using Samba 4.1.17 Debian Pkg.       kind regards   OLIVER WERNER System-Administrator   Kontrast Communication Services GmbH  Grafenberger Allee 100, 40237 Düsseldorf, Germany Fon  +49-211-91505-500 Fax +49-211-91505-530 www.kontrast.de Amtsgericht Düsseldorf: HRB 26934 Geschäftsführer: Joachim Fischer, Anja Grote-Lutter, Leontine van der Vlist                            Am 18.03.2016 um 09:47 schrieb Oliver Werner <oliver.werner at kontrast.de>:   Ok i will test it...

Dear listmembers, I have a little question: I have my data organized as follow sic level area a 211 2.4 b 311 2.3 b 322 0.2 b 322 0.5 c 100 3.0 c 100 1.5 c 242 1.5 d 222 0.2 where levels and sics are factors. I'm trying to obtain a matrix like this: level 211 311 322 100 242 222 sic a 2.4 0 0...