search for: 210kbps

...e any differences. (I do love it though, it really gets my floor shaking; I'll keep it around for testing purposes.) The only remaining issue is the way that Opus doesn't even come close to respecting the requested bitrate for this sample. For instance, encoding it at 130 gives me a file of 210kbps. Over a wide corpus of music, I've noticed libopus almost invariably overshoots the bitrate, rather than averaging out close to it; only speech is consistently at or below it. Em -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail...

...I do love it though, it really gets my > floor shaking; I'll keep it around for testing purposes.) The only > remaining issue is the way that Opus doesn't even come close to respecting > the requested bitrate for this sample. For instance, encoding it at 130 > gives me a file of 210kbps. Over a wide corpus of music, I've noticed > libopus almost invariably overshoots the bitrate, rather than averaging out > close to it; only speech is consistently at or below it. Maybe there's some bug still undiscovered. Would you agree that Opus should encode a pure sinus tone eff...

On Nov 05 11:32:49, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 05 11:05:34, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone appears in the audible spectrum? While significantly larger, Opus had produced significant ghost noise (much less than Vorbis did)... I experience the "same" low level noise even in a wav file, even on