Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "21.14".
Did you mean:
1.14
2017 Apr 06
3
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
On 6 Apr 2017, at 21.14, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> imap-hibernate processes are similar to imap-login processes in that they
>> should be able to handle thousands or even tens of thousands of connections
>> per process.
>>
>
> TL;DR: In a director/proxy setup, what's a good client_limit for
>
2011 Dec 05
2
Strange quota problem
I have a strange problems with quota on v2.0.14. We have an ldap user
directory, and all users should have a mailQuota defined there. My
problem is that some users gets the quota enforced, while others don't,
and "doveadm user" doesn't seem to agree with "doveadm quota ge gett"
Ref:
$ doveadm user janfrode at example.net
userdb: janfrode at example.net
home
2013 Jun 01
0
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:45:48AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
> These results are very disappointing, I was hoping to see a big improvement
> somewhere instead of no real improvement anywhere (except for gas_dyn) or a
> regression (eg: mdbx). I think LLVM now has a reasonable array of fast-math
> optimizations. I will try to find time to poke at gas_dyn and induct: since
>
2003 Dec 17
1
repeated measures aov problem
Hi all,
I have a strange problem and rigth now I can't figure out a
solution.
Trying to calculate an ANOVA with one between subject factor (group)
and one within (hemisphere). My dependent variable is source
localization (data). My N = 25.
My data.frame looks like this:
> ML.dist.stack
subj group hemisphere data
1 1 tin left 0.7460840
2 2 tin left
2013 Jun 02
4
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
Hi Jack, thanks for splitting out what the effects of LLVM's / GCC's vectorizers
is.
On 01/06/13 21:34, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:45:48AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>
>> These results are very disappointing, I was hoping to see a big improvement
>> somewhere instead of no real improvement anywhere (except for gas_dyn) or a
>> regression
2013 Jun 01
3
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
Hi Jack,
On 29/05/13 22:04, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch,
>> so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great
>> if you could redo the benchmarks rc3.
>>
>
> Duncan,
> As requested, appended
2013 Jun 02
0
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
Jack,
Can you please file a bug report and attach the BC files for the major loops that we miss ?
Thanks,
Nadav
On Jun 2, 2013, at 1:27, Duncan Sands <duncan.sands at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jack, thanks for splitting out what the effects of LLVM's / GCC's vectorizers
> is.
>
> On 01/06/13 21:34, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:45:48AM +0200,
2011 Feb 08
1
How to recover a mail box from an assertion failure
I'm running Dovecot version 1.2.11 and getting this assertion error on a user's mail:
Panic: file /home/durket/dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <=
2011 Jul 31
1
libtoolize warnings when building
When building the HG checkout, I'm getting:
...
libtoolize: Consider adding AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])' to configure.in and
libtoolize: rerunning libtoolize, to keep the correct libtool macros in-tree.
libtoolize: Consider adding -I m4' to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am.a
Making distclean in doc
My build command looks like this:
hg pull
hg update
./autogen.sh
make -j distclean
2006 Dec 05
2
prs_mem_get: buffer overrun
Hello all,
I repost this mail with a new subject line because on
the original one ("Unable to join domain from WNT4")
i've got no respnse.
version is 3.0.23d (the same happens with 3.0.21c )
running as a PDC
OS: Linux 2.6.11.4-21.14-smp, (from SuSE 9.3) on dual Opterons.
After upgrading from 3.0.11 to 3.0.23d, all Windows-NT4-sp6
machines were no longer DOMAIN-members - WinXP or
2013 Oct 01
1
[bug] ssl-params hangs when FIPS is enabled
Hi,
we found a bug in ssl-params. It calls openssl DH generator for 512 and
1024 bits, but in FIPS mode, openssl won't generate anything for less
than 1024, so it fails with:
error:0506A06E:Diffie-Hellman routines:DH_BUILTIN_GENPARAMS:key size too
small
but when DH generator fails, ssl-params hangs forever in io_loop_run:
__epoll_wait_nocancel()
io_loop_handler_run(..) at
2017 Apr 07
0
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
Hello,
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:13:07 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2017, at 21.14, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> imap-hibernate processes are similar to imap-login processes in that they
> >> should be able to handle thousands or even tens of thousands of connections
> >> per process.
> >>
2013 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
Actually this kind of opportunities, as outlined bellow, was one of my
contrived motivating
example for fast-math. But last year we don't see such opportunities in
real applications we care about.
t1 = x1/y
...
t2 = x2/y.
I think it is better to be taken care by GVN/PRE -- blindly convert
x/y => x *1/y is not necessarily
beneficial. Or maybe we can blindly perform such
2008 Mar 18
0
Walds Z in a mixed model
I recently reviewed a paper that used Wald's Z in a mixed model
analysis. The dataset (see end of message for complete dataset) has
individual animals (SAMPLE) from within social groups, from within
geographic regions. Y is the response variable. The paper ran a mixed
model with year and region as fixed effects, group a random effect
nested within region, and sample nested within group. I
2012 Apr 17
1
Test-Predict R survival analysis
Hi,
I'm trying to use the R Survival analysis on a windows 7 system.
The input data format is described at the end of this mail.
1/ I tried to perform a survival analysis including stratified variables
using the following formula.
cox.xtab_miR=coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ miR + strata(sex,nbligne, age),
data=matrix)
and obtain the following error message
Warning message:
In fitter(X, Y,
2017 Apr 06
3
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
On 6 Apr 2017, at 9.56, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote:
>
>> For no particular reason besides wanting to start conservatively, we've got
>> client_limit set to 50 on the hibernate procs (with 1100 total hibernated
>> connections on the box I'm looking at). At only a little over a meg each,
>> I'm fine with those extra processes.
>>
2008 Oct 05
1
io writes very slow when using vmware server
We are struggling with a strange problem.
When we have some VMWare clients running (mostly MS windows clients),
than the IO-write performance on the host becomes very bad.
The guest os's do not do anything, just having them started,
sitting at the login prompt, is enough to trigger the problem.
The host has plenty of 4G of RAM, and all clients fit easily into
the space.
The disksystem is a
2002 Apr 18
1
Help with lme basics
In Baron and Li's "Notes on the use of R for psychology experiments and questionnaires" http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/rpsych.htm they describe a balanced data set for a drug experiment:
"... a test of drug treatment effect by one between-subject factor: group (two groups of 8 subjects each) and two within-subject factors: drug (2 levels) and dose (3 levels). "
2017 Apr 10
2
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:13:07 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On 6 Apr 2017, at 21.14, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> imap-hibernate processes are similar to imap-login processes in that
> they
> >
2013 Apr 22
7
Multiple lon lat points in the map with ggplot2
Hello R users,
For the last few days I am struggling with the following task:
my data.frame:
A1 A2 A3 B1 B2
B3
58.81 53.292 54.501 13.013 17.39 19.407 56.02 56.251 54.033 20.099 13.15
10.411 55.376 53.099 57.625 13.396 21.031 13.22 58.584 53.194 54.218
13.038 16.854 19.289 55.7 55.921 53.847 19.942 13.153 9.828 55.093 52.934