Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "20x10x180".
2004 Aug 06
2
DMCA and webcasting
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> > ==================================================================
> > hey josh,
> > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online
> > streaming. reasons for this rash decision involve around a new law that
> > was put in place over the summer saying that stations who broadcast online
> >
2004 Aug 06
0
DMCA and webcasting
...d us %15 of our gross revenue, hell I would gladly pay them %100 of
$0. Even if they insisted on collecting $0.004 per performance I don't think
we have even 100000 "performances" a year. Say 20 listeners a day, each hears
as many as 10 songs, we broadcast for about 180 days a year,
20x10x180*$0.004 = $140. We are not talking big bucks here, it certainly
does not seems like reason to stop webcasting.
> > Then in other words, you're stealing music even for your online
> > broadcast. You _must_ pay ASCAP, BMI, and/or SESAC in order to
> > broadcast _anything_ over...
2004 Aug 06
2
DMCA and webcasting
...,
end of story. Jwz covers this on his site IIRC.
> Even if they insisted on collecting $0.004 per performance I don't think
> we have even 100000 "performances" a year. Say 20 listeners a day, each hears
> as many as 10 songs, we broadcast for about 180 days a year,
> 20x10x180*$0.004 = $140. We are not talking big bucks here, it certainly
> does not seems like reason to stop webcasting.
I've not heard anything this low in cost. Considering the royalty rate is
roughly 6-8 cents (USD) ($0.06) and it's been awhile since I've dealt w/
those numbers, I would...