search for: 2037

I have the following problem: As expected I obtain timeBasedSeq( 2037/2037) [1] "2037-01-01" > However if I do the same for 2038 I get timeBasedSeq( 2038/2038) [1] "2038-01-01" "2039-01-01" I get the same strange result if I use later years or any interval that contains 2038: timeBasedSeq( 2037/2039) [1] "2037-01-01" &quot...

> Dear list, > > I have some data on a geneaology, here is a subset: > warmerge[1:11,c(1,6,25)] > Warrior SibID birth.year > 1100 3793 2013 1926 > 4 2013 2024 1934 > 1094 3769 2024 1918 > 632 2747 2037 1928 > 176 2083 2039 1944 > 187 2085 2039 1949 > 192 2086 2039 NA > 495 2556 2039 1940 > 71 2050 2040 1950 > 343 2158 2040 1926 > 930 3045 2040 1948 > > I have then extracted the lowest...

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:2037 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2037 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: db0fcf759d83908a5ffe7caeefa28f0c993645d279479cf421325f1d471af107 firefox-68.8.0-1.el7.centos.i...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037 Priority: P5 Bug ID: 2037 Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Summary: sshd Causing DNS Queries on ListenAddress when binding to IPV4 and IPV6 addresses on AIX Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified...

So, just wanting to verify - since I *think* I understand but am not sure. [The Wiki article might be clarified re: rfc2037 - and avoid questions like this.] 2037 only comes into play if you're interested in controlling local access for *nix users on the local file system. Thus, if you are, for example, setting up a [or a pair, or more] DC only, which won't have local users - than 2037 won't matter. In my...

> > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 12:50:10 -0600 > From: lustig hanna <lustig@rafael.co.il> > To: samba-bugs@anu.edu.au, samba@anu.edu.au > Subject: Samba printers > Message-ID: <36FD2862.9DED95F3@rafael.co.il> > > We are trying to define some printers from an NT work station defined > as a member in an NT domain. It's seems that samba has some problem in

Full_Name: J. R. M. Hosking Version: 1.5 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (198.81.209.17) Here is a test case: # Some arbitrary data # v1<-1:12 v2<-cumsum(v1) v3<-cumsum(v2) f<-factor(rep(c("a","b","c"),4)) y<-c(1,4,2,7,5,8,7,9,6,10,12,10) print(cbind(y,f,v1,v2,v3)) # # Fit a regression model with no intercept, and different slopes # for each

Dear R-users, I have a complex line by xy-values (ordered by z). And I would like to get interpolated y-values on the positions of x = 0:600. How do I get the correct points? x=c(790,790,790,790,790,786,783,778,778,766,763,761,761,761,715,628,521,350,160,134,134,129,108,101,93,111,161,249,288,243,139,45,7)

Hello, I have some data that has dates in the form 27.02.37. I convert them to a date object as follows: as.Date(data$date,format="%d.%m.%y") But this gives me years such as 2037 when I would like them to be 1937. I thought of trying to take off some time i.e. as.Date(camCD$DoB,format="%d.%m.%y") - 100*365 But that doesn't seem to work out correctly. Any ideas how to do this? Thanks Dan -- ************************************************************** Dan...

...and received via either server and there are no errors being reported (both platforms are in debug mode). In essence everything appears to be working fine. The issue is that after the index is initially built (all email timestamps are correct) however any new incoming email is timestamped: 8 July 2037 23:53 I checked the index files: drwx------ 5 XXXX mail 4096 Nov 12 20:41 .UND -rw------- 1 XXXX staff 1472 Nov 13 12:30 .nfs.2005105c.0583 -rw------- 2 XXXX mail 56668 Nov 13 15:44 .nfs.200514ff.0583 -rw------- 2 XXXX mail 1364 Nov 13 15:44 .nfs.20051500.0583 drwx--...

...ient supported enctypes: arcfour-hmac-md5, -133, -128, des-cbc-md5, des-cbc-crc, 24, -135 Kerberos: Using arcfour-hmac-md5/aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 Kerberos: Requested flags: renewable_ok, canonicalize, renewable, forwardable Kerberos: AS-REQ authtime: 2007-02-12T22:52:10 starttime: unset endtime: 2037-09-13T04:48:05 renew till: 2037-09-13T04:48:05 Kerberos: Failed to verify AP-REQ: Clock skew too great Kerberos: Failed parsing TGS-REQ from 10.0.0.101 Kerberos: TGS-REQ Administrator@LEOSENDE.FUN from 10.0.0.101 for cifs/debian.leosende.fun@LEOSENDE.FUN [renewable, forwardable] Kerberos: TGS-REQ...

...Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jari.aalto at cante.net Created attachment 2037 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2037 Improve sshd_config layout - Add section breaks to help finding visual cues. Indent standard text to column 8 (position of tab) and leave configuration examples to the left. - Add new example: how to restrict root login only inside l...

...quot; [28] "2031-05-12" "2031-05-12" "2031-05-12" "2031-05-12" "2031-05-07" "2031-05-07" "2031-05-07" "2031-05-07" "2026-12-31" [37] "2026-12-31" "2026-12-31" "2026-12-31" "2037-08-20" "2037-08-20" "2037-08-20" "2037-08-20" "2033-12-08" "2033-12-08" [46] "2033-12-08" "2033-12-08" "2038-07-17" "2038-07-17" "2038-07-17" "2038-07-17" "2020-10-09" &quot...

...OUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 22 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.16:22 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p udp --dport 27960 -j DNAT -- to 192.168.0.13:27960 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 27960 -j DNAT -- to 192.168.0.13:27960 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 2037 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.13:2037 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p udp --dport 2037 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.13:2037 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 6969 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2:6969 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9...

..., mpid=26170, secured Jun 8 15:32:16 host-01 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<test1 at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.5.102, lip=192.168.5.100, mpid=26426, secured -- ? ?????????, ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????????? ??? "??????-?????" ???.: (423) 262-02-62 (???. 2037) ????: (423) 262-02-10 a.kostyrev at serverc.ru icq: 404-198-497

OK, Thanks for all. Regards; On 23/07/2019 12:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 23/07/2019 16:02, Carlos via samba wrote: >> I haven't more output log, because i need join in dc in last week, >> and i "resolved"(workaround) in used samba 4.6.X -> after -> 4.8.3. >> Sorry..... > > OK, it would have been nice to have the output, this is

...ked_values[38/38] Partition[DC=interno,DC=XXXXXX,DC=com,DC=br] objects[499/2393] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=interno,DC=XXXXXX,DC=com,DC=br] objects[901/2393] linked_values[0/0] Partition[DC=interno,DC=XXXXXX,DC=com,DC=br] objects[1303/2393] linked_values[0/96] ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:2037: duplicate attribute value in CN=001-CONTABIL-04,CN=Computers,DC=interno,DC=XXXXXX,DC=com,DC=br for index on servicePrincipalName, duplicate of objectGUID a1defff7-33e8-4110-bc08-fd7b1d32dafd in @INDEX:SERVICEPRINCIPALNAME:TERMSRV/001-CONTABIL-04.INTERNO.XXXXXX.COM.BR Partition[DC=interno,DC=XX...

...ror logs now a warning, an error and a fatal - APPEND / SEARCH: If internaldate was outside valid value for time_t, we returned BAD error for APPEND and SEARCH never matched. With 64bit systems this shouldn't have happened. With 32bit systems the valid range is usually for years 1902..2037. See ChangeLog for more. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070612/0e4326ef/atta...

...gets through to the sending of the command, then fails: debug1: Sending command: <command parameters> debug2: channel 0: request exec confirm 1 debug2: fd 3 setting TCP_NODELAY debug2: callback done debug2: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 32768 debug3: Wrote 224 bytes for a total of 2037 debug2: channel 0: rcvd adjust 2097152 debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0 debug2: exec request accepted on channel 0 debug2: channel 0: rcvd ext data 31 Host key verification failed. debug2: channel 0: written 31 to fed 6 Any idea why this would fail? Cheers, and thanks for any i...

...: x86_64 nr_cpus : 4 nr_nodes : 1 cores_per_socket : 4 threads_per_core : 1 cpu_mhz : 2133 hw_caps : bfebfbff:28100800:00000000:00003b40:009ce3bd:00000000:00000001:00000000 virt_caps : hvm total_memory : 2037 free_memory : 988 free_cpus : 0 xen_major : 4 xen_minor : 2 xen_extra : .2-23.el6 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_scheduler : credit xen_pagesize...