search for: 20181031

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278 Bug ID: 1278 Summary: FTBFS on musl due to missing include Product: ulogd Version: SVN (please provide timestamp) Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ulogd Assignee:

...g xrandr to cause the issue I don't know what further info could be usefull -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20181031/5af7c5b2/attachment.html>

...lores, para prescindir del texto. Adjunto imagen de trabajo realizado en R para un estudio longitudinal, que se acerca a lo que quisiera hacer. Gracias! ------------ próxima parte ------------ Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20181031/c24b74b4/attachment-0001.html> ------------ próxima parte ------------ A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG-20181030-WA0009.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 53653 bytes Desc: no disponible URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20181031/c24b74b4/attachment-0001.jpg&g...

...| https://osci.io gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20181031/bee1c67d/attachment-0006.sig>

Hi all. I've reported a bug over at the Ubuntu bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1799180 Given the logs in kern.log it certainly looks like the nouveau driver is the culprit. The system becomes incredibly slow ultimately becoming unusable, and the fan screams. Full details including driver / kernel version and full kernel log over at the bug, but I see a bunch

Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]: