Displaying 20 results from an estimated 31 matches for "20131002".
Did you mean:
  20101002
  
2013 Oct 02
2
Invalid options
...avior, let's say to run "invalid option" if any other number was pressed doesn't belong to the current menu level?
Thanks.  		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131002/b3f76f63/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
...it scales quadratically with the number of
supported SIMD architectures, including all variations (like NEON v7, v8
and CPU dependent choices).
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131002/93019bbd/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
...ss that you have written.
Of course, adding tests for all known supported conversions to/from would
be critical to the success of your project.
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131002/354ccad1/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
2
unknown message 0:0 [sender]
...eceiver=3.1.0]
Running the same command with a rsync 3.1.0 client works fine.
Did I miss something about compatibility between protocols ?
thanks in advance,
Tom.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20131002/c2de70c8/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
3
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
...idea how easy would be to do that, let alone if it's at all
possible, but it seems that this is what you want. Correct me if I'm wrong.
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131002/d4fc7475/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
----- Original Message -----
> On 2 October 2013 12:17, Renato Golin < renato.golin at linaro.org >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 October 2013 10:12, Steven Newbury < steve at snewbury.org.uk >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How does this make any sense?
> 
> 
> I have to agree with you that this doesn't make much sense, but there
> is
2013 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] [TableGen][AsmParser][MC] isAsmParserOnly flag in class Instruction
...s.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu<http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131002/f81ddfb8/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
0
Análisis de componentes principales con ade4 y FactoMineR
...______________________
>> R-help-es mailing list
>> R-help-es en r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help-es
>
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20131002/c1b1b5a7/attachment-0001.html>
------------ próxima parte ------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no disponible
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15915 bytes
Desc: no disponible
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20131002/c1b1b5a7/attachment-0001.jpe>
2013 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
...a goal on its own.
Do you have any ideas where in the whole LLVM structure would it fit
(should it be implemented as a separate optional pass)?
Thanks,
 - Stan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131002/8fa7d401/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 02
5
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
...nfo/llvmdev
> >
>
> --
> Hal Finkel
> Assistant Computational Scientist
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131002/3bf4cac4/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] Add Support For .bss Named Section Directive For Darwin Targets
Thanks - how would I go about getting this committed?
Nick
On 30 September 2013 13:50, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> LGTM
>
> On 29 September 2013 06:08, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe it's a feature missing in MC -
>>
2013 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] Add Support For .bss Named Section Directive For Darwin Targets
On 1 October 2013 15:40, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks - how would I go about getting this committed?
I can commit it for you or you can apply for commit access.
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access
Cheers,
Rafael
2013 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Removing legacy profiling code from LLVM
It appears to me as if you're proposing removing all the existing
readers/writers, both the really old ones and the metadata ones, the
instrumentation passes, and the implied file format for profile data.  Is
this correct?
While I'm not against considering migrating our work, I think it would be
better if the new system was in place before removing the old.
  --Mike
2013 Oct 02
1
signalling default value
Hi list
What is the default value for signalling in /usr/local/etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf file?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131001/bfc21f7d/attachment.html>
2013 Sep 17
33
[Bug 69488] New: GF108 (NVC1) GPU lockup
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69488
          Priority: medium
            Bug ID: 69488
          Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
           Summary: GF108 (NVC1) GPU lockup
        QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
          Severity: normal
    Classification: Unclassified
                OS: All
          Reporter: vekinn at gmail.com
          Hardware: Other
   
2013 Oct 01
5
Análisis de componentes principales con ade4 y FactoMineR
Hola compañeros de la lista, qué tal.
     Estoy haciendo un análisis de componentes principales utilizando 
las funciones "dudi.pca" (paquete "ade4") y "PCA" (paquete 
"FactoMineR"). Sucede que al comparar las coordenadas de cada individuo 
que obtiene cada función, las que corresponden al segundo componente 
principal tienen idéntica magnitud pero con
2013 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC
Stan,
Do you mean that you want to emulate the ARM NEON intrinsics on PowerPC?
 -Hal
----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> Hello LLVM Devs,
> 
> 
> Thanks for helping me previously to cross-compile for ARM, I managed
> to get a working toolchain and am currently having fun compiling
> different toy problems and running them on a pandaboard.
> 
> As part of my
2013 Sep 10
1
[HCL] Eaton 5S1500LCD supported by usbhid-ups
Device Manufacturer: Eaton
Device Name: 5S1500LCD
----------------------------------------------------------
upsc output:
battery.charge: 100
battery.charge.low: 20
battery.runtime: 3515
battery.type: PbAc
device.mfr: EATON
device.model: Ellipse PRO 1500 
device.serial: 0000000000
device.type: ups
driver.name: usbhid-ups
driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30
driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2
2013 Sep 10
1
[HCL] Eaton 5S1500LCD supported by usbhid-ups
Device Manufacturer: Eaton
Device Name: 5S1500LCD
----------------------------------------------------------
upsc output:
battery.charge: 100
battery.charge.low: 20
battery.runtime: 3515
battery.type: PbAc
device.mfr: EATON
device.model: Ellipse PRO 1500 
device.serial: 0000000000
device.type: ups
driver.name: usbhid-ups
driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30
driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2
2013 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI
----- Original Message -----
> 
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Michele Scandale
> <michele.scandale at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello to everybody,
> > 
> > I'm working on some improvements on trip count computation with
> > ScalarEvolution
> > analysis.
> > Considering the following test
> > 
> >