search for: 20100222

...at bup-4hr-20100227-200000CST sending from @bup-4hr-20100227-200000CST to zp1/lydy at bup-4hr-20100228-000000CST received 271KB stream in 1 seconds (271KB/sec) sending from @bup-4hr-20100228-000000CST to zp1/lydy at bup-4hr-20100228-040000CST receiving incremental stream of zp1/lydy at bup-monthly-20100222-210000CST into bup-r\ uin/fsfs/zp1/lydy at bup-monthly-20100222-210000CST received 312B stream in 1 seconds (312B/sec) receiving incremental stream of zp1/lydy at bup-daily-20100222-210000CST into bup-rui\ n/fsfs/zp1/lydy at bup-daily-20100222-210000CST sending from @bup-4hr-20100228-040000CST to z...

...o destroy this e-mail message immediately. The copy, dissemination or use of this e-mail message by other than the intended recipients is prohibited. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100222/ed2540dc/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: att230c9.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 10316 bytes Desc: att230c9.jpg URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100222/ed2540dc/attachment.jpg> -------------- next...

...Asterisk dbuser = asteriskuser dbpass = asteriskpasswd dbport = 3306 dbsock = /tmp/mysql.sock Something I'm missing ?? Need extra configuration ? Jonas. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100222/6d147dcc/attachment.htm

...ca/1805594 Not sure why the local channel won't send to context while the remote channel does. Worked fine in 1.4 but 1.6.1 has issues. Any help? Ritesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100222/bd58706c/attachment.htm

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal Tags: patch kernel log lines of the form: ...kernel: [1933150.816604] TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:ffff:d04e:3f6b:4038/80 shrinks window 2491430013:2491430014. Repaired. are not caught by the current rules. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal In the file /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/wu-ftpd ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$ should be ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd\[[0-9]{4}\]: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$ There is a number after "wu-ftpd" -- System

..." ); } asm ("END_INIT"); asm ("\n/*@_init_EPILOG_ENDS*/"); asm ("\n/*@_fini_PROLOG_BEGINS*/"); Regards, Sergey Yakoushkin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100222/552a9021/attachment.html>

...shl $p0, $p0, $r0 // shift left p0 by r0 and store result in p0 where p0 is a pair r0:r1 Could anyone tell me what am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance Artur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100222/dd26349f/attachment.html>

...t exactly the same behavior on Debian/sid and OS X. -- Regards, Wartan. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Report-fig1.eps Type: application/postscript Size: 19321 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20100222/83400aac/attachment.eps>

e -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100222/1337b47a/attachment.html>

Dear readers, can anyone give an example how to use cross-validation in the plsr package. I miss to find the number of factors proposed by cross-validation as optimum. Thank you Peter -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/cross-validation-in-plsr-package-tp1563815p1563815.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello *, I've a well functioning dovecot.1.2.10 installation. I'd like to migrate to dovecot.2.0.beta. Is it possible to use one (big) dovecot.conf or must I split it into pieces into directory conf.d? What is the best procedure to convert the configuration file? Any pointers welcome. --Frank Elsner

Hello, I couldn't find any recent informations regarding the status of implementing replication to Dovecot. Especially master/master is what I am waiting for. Is it useable yet with 2.0 or, if not, any eta? Thanks in advance, Michael

...nd retrieve mail count from maildir? Thanks and best regards. -- Marcio Merlone -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: marcio_merlone.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 326 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20100222/5a4ddf29/attachment-0002.vcf>

Hello, while reading config options for dovecot v1.2.10 I've noticed a very small bug: # ./configure --help | egrep -- 'Dovecot|--with-gnu-ld' `configure' configures Dovecot 1.2.10 to adapt to many kinds of systems. --with-gnu-ld assume the C compiler uses GNU ld [default=no] --with-gnu-ld assume the C compiler uses GNU ld default=no I think the latter

...llation. Most recently I installed asterisk (SVN-trunk-r248269) on Ubuntu Server 9.10. Have I missed something in the install process somewhere? Thanks, Nic. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100222/bd9faa88/attachment.htm

...om *-809-849-8087 *-------------------------------------------------------* _________________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100222/4e5cea74/attachment.htm

...recorded for about 30 minutes before its recovery after power cycling . Can you please let me know where I can check to find the root cause of failure ? Thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100222/e3bc0f5a/attachment.html>

...pliant device at 0000:00:00.0. Could someone meet this problem ? I googled around and saw some other people were having a similar issue but with laptops .... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100222/74348ab4/attachment.html>

Hello, Artur > I have defined registers, aliases and subregister set. > The problem is that register allocator is using 32bit registers that are > already used in a pair, for example: > lw $r0, 16[$r12]   // load word to r0 > ld $p0, 36[$r12]   // load doubleword to p0 > shl $p0, $p0, $r0    // shift left p0 by r0  and store result in p0 > where p0 is a pair r0:r1 > Could