Displaying 20 results from an estimated 34 matches for "20050616".
Did you mean:
20050613
2005 Jun 16
4
Out of memory problems - some interesting log file entries
...ain now, but if anyone
can provide some input on these messages...
TIA
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: log-jun16.zip
Type: application/x-zip
Size: 1370 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050616/21cbe43c/attachment-0003.bin>
2005 Jun 16
1
Antw: CentOS Digest, Vol 5, Issue 15
...telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm
I tried two different mirror, but this error Message was always the same.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Arthur ME?NER.vcf
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050616/5edf1532/attachment-0003.ksh>
2005 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] Useless/Mis-placed Tests?
...a reason we haven't done this yet?
Reid
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050616/11ea0d98/attachment.sig>
2005 Jun 17
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
...i386.rpm
src:
gaim-1.3.1-0.el3.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/ac2b85a4/attachment-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:02:37 -0500
From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gaim
- security update
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Messag...
2005 Jun 14
1
small dovecot problem
Hi all, just noticed a small problem in test70. If you have an mail in
your maildir 'new' directory, and use another method to delete that
email (for instance pop it through another pop server), dovecot will
continue to report that email as being on the server. So if you had 1
email, delete it through pop, dovecot will continue to say that 1 email
is on the server, even if you
2005 Jun 16
1
customflags and keywords
OK. After checking the 0.99->1.0 migration documentation, it seems I've been a
little confused between customflags and keywords. (Though this is partly due to
my repeated requests for clarification being ignored.)
The page (http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/UpgradingDovecot) says 1.0 does not
use .customflags any more. Now, I'm hoping they're still supported, in which
case
2005 Jun 14
2
Call parking in multi user environment
I'm looking for a solution for call parking in an environment where
multiple users are hosted on a single instance of asterisk. The main
issue being a way to keep user A from picking up calls parked by user
B.
I downloaded the supervaletparking code from asterlink which would
appear to be a solution, but it doesn't compile on the latest CVS
HEAD. I sent an email to the author just in
2005 Jun 16
0
Asterisk on Fedora Cora 3
...ts at stratup it will be recognise with 14 processes and
if it start normaly in terminal top don't give me any activity about is
work. Can anyone help me?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050616/a0cdd88e/attachment.htm
2005 Jun 16
0
SIP connection
...vate hte IAX on freeworlddialup but does not work I can't make or receive calls. I virtually new in this can please somebody help me.
thanks,
scorpionny
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050616/3c5555b8/attachment.htm
2005 Jun 16
1
Routing SIP to Cisco routers running IOS 12.3+
...dy out there have any experiencing sending SIP down-wire from
Asterisk to the Cisco IOS? We might be willing to pay for the right
kind of help here.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050616/dc66ca1b/attachment.htm
2005 Jun 16
3
Dial Commands "D" Option Question
When using the dial command and the D option to send DTMF digits when
the channel is answered, is there a way to allow for some dead air,
and then send more DTMF digits? I would like to automate a call, and
it requires entry of a few short dtmf digits all a couple seconds
apart from each other.
Thanks!
2006 Apr 01
0
CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gaim- security update
...i386.rpm
src:
gaim-1.3.1-0.el3.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/ac2b85a4/attachment-0005.bin
2006 Apr 01
0
CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gaim - security update
...6_64.rpm
src:
gaim-1.3.1-0.el3.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/90ca5db1/attachment-0005.bin
2006 Apr 01
1
CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 bzip2 - security update
...rpm
src:
bzip2-1.0.2-13.EL4.2.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/5c01c01e/attachment-0005.bin
2006 Apr 01
1
CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 4 i386 bzip2 - security update
....rpm
src:
bzip2-1.0.2-13.EL4.2.src.rpm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/92deaf91/attachment-0005.bin
2006 Apr 01
0
CentOS 4 x86_64 - CentOS 4.1 x86_64 is available
...es the default
version for all updates.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/f4eca92e/attachment-0005.bin
2006 Apr 01
0
CentOS 4.1 is now released and is set to be the default CentOS 4 version
...sjr on IRC)
CentOS 4 Lead Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20050616/fd3b3551/attachment-0005.bin
2005 Jun 16
1
Grandstream phones losing registration with server.
...gging it to reboot, ...... lol
Is there anything that you could recommend I do to stop the phones from
losing registration with the server?
Cheers
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050616/d18bd136/attachment.htm
2005 Jun 16
1
Newbie question about pressing a key to, be connected to the caller
...http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailma
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050616/05c1614a/attachment.htm
2005 Jun 16
0
[LLVMdev] Useless/Mis-placed Tests?
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Reid Spencer wrote:
> For some time now the tests in llvm-test/SingleSource/Regression and
> llvm-test/SingleSource/UnitTests have been producing no meaningful
> performance data other than "working". I think one of two things should
> be done, on a case-by-case basis:
>
> 1. Tests that are clearly simple, quick running tests should be moved
>