search for: 200503

...day of the month, I tried > as.Date(as.yearmon(x$Date,frac=0)) But I don't get the last day of the month here. (Tried frac=1 too.) I then add a month to the date, substract one day from the resultant date. But this wouldn't work for December. > x$YearEnd [1] 200203 200303 200403 200503 200603 200603 200312 200503 200603 200203 200303 [12] 200403 200503 200512 200612 200203 200303 200403 200503 200603 > > x$Date <- as.Date(ISOdate(substr(x$YearEnd,1,4), + as.integer(substr(x$YearEnd,5,6))+1, + 1))-1 > x$Date [1] "2002-03-31" "2003-03-31" "200...

...e] transfer only files newer than file or date (e.g. rsync --newer "15/03/05 21:22:00" -a dir1 dir2) That would really make my day when transferring daily cumulative sql changelogs and not having to keep older ones. E.G: changelog-200502-09.sql 100Mb changelog-200503-01.sql 100Mb changelog-200503-02.sql 100Mb changelog-200503-03.sql 56Mb (and growing) The first 3 files were transferred, applied to the backup database and deleted. The third file is then partially transferred until it reaches 100Mb. There's no way however to just rsync files newer than chang...

...s<-function(yrs, numSplits) { unlist(lapply(yrs, function(x){ paste(x,formatC(numSplits, width = 2, flag = 0), collapse = "|", sep = "")})) } Here is an example of running the function: groupingStrings(2004:2006, 1:3) [1] "200401|200402|200403" "200501|200502|200503" "200601|200602|200603" This would yield first quarter matches for the years 2004 through 2006. My plan was to use both splitIt and groupingStrings to be able to create regexps all quarters. In addition I want it to be flexible enough for me to be able to create matching regexps...

...------------------------------------------ Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-03-12 16:35 ------- I'd suggest using a combination of "find" and the --files-from option to rsync: find . -newer changelog-200503-02.sql | rsync -av --files-from=- . host:/dest/ or find /src -mtime -1 | rsync -av --files-from=- / host:/dest/ Unfortunately, that only works (easily) with a push, which is rather annoying. Even so, I'm currently doubtful that I'll include this, but I'll leave it open for now as a...

Hello everyone, Consider we have this following set of code: int foo() { int a,b; a = __builtin_XX(0x11); b = __builtin_XX(0x11); return a+b; } The problem currently is that LLVM eliminated the second call and copied the result from the first call into a new set of registers. Is there is a way to force LLVM to generate two explicit calls to a builtin function. The builtin takes in an integer