search for: 2.6.10

Hello all, apologies if my question has an obvious answer or it's too naive (I sent this directly to Peter with the intent of not chocking the list with possibly ridicolous questions...). I just tried to build both syslinux-3.00 and 3.01, with the same bad result. Out of the box compilation with: make depend make installer fails with: ... gcc -Wp,-MT,extlinux.o,-MMD,.extlinux.o.d -W

Hi, I installed 2.0.5 binary release of Xen in my FC3 , and below is my grub.conf ---- part of grub.conf -- title Fedora Core (2.6.10-1.766_FC3) root (hd0,7) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.10-1.766_FC3 ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.10-1.766_FC3.img title Xen 2.0 / XenLinux 2.6.10 root (hd0,7) kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 module

Hi, Some questions here : 1. Is there a way to compile kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.9-mm1 with xen 2.0? I tried both (with mkbuildtree from linux-2.6.9-xen-sparse), and both failed (on different places). My primary goal is to use reiser4 on both xen-0 and xen-U kernel, so I''m more interested in -mm kernel. 2. If I use kernel 2.4.27 (xen-U), top doesn''t show correct cpu usage

Some tidbits to make Xen (-unstable) compile with the latest 2.6 snapshot. No need for you to duplicate the work I already did. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> --- linux-2.6.10/arch/xen/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c.bk7 2005-01-06 17:30:48.000000000 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.10/arch/xen/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c 2005-01-06 20:54:39.000000000 -0500 @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ /* platform

Hello. I found bugs on error handlings in the functions arround the ext3 file system, which cause inadequate completions of synchronous write I/O operations when disk I/O failures occur. Both 2.4 and 2.6 have this problem. I carried out following experiment: 1. Mount a ext3 file system on a SCSI disk with ordered mode. 2. Open a file on the file system with O_SYNC|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC|O_CREAT

Hi I''m running Xen on Fedora core 3... uname -a Linux groucho 2.6.10-1.1148_FC4xen0 #1 SMP Sat Feb 19 15:15:24 EST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 121 0 r---- 140.9 What I''m trying to do is get SuSE 9.2 to come up in it''s own domain.. /dev/hda2 = root for FC-3

Our newly build xen kernel does not boot. The error message is : Invalid or unsupported executable format. I have build xen from the xen-2.0.4 source (make world, make install) on a debian sarge system. I have not changed any of the kernel configurations, I did make an initrd image. The entry in my menu.lst is : title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.10-xen0 root (hd0,0) #

Hi Everyone, I read through the list on the issues with the ztdummy driver which I need for MeetMe, but I seem to have come across a problem that I cannot seem to find an answer for. I am running Gentoo 2.6.10 on an Intel box. I have read the the wiki entries on the ztdummy and followed the instructions as they relate to the 2.6 kernel. Everything compiled great, but a modprobe ztdummy

Hi all, I have a problem where when I try to write to a 'vfat' partition (in Fedora Core 3, rsync 2.6.3) I get this error: -=-=-[ error ]-=-=- rsync: mkdir "/mnt/tle-bu/src0/tle-bu/231e2838-93b0-4f6f-8b8b-f09e24e1ed80" failed: No such file or directory (2) rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at main.c(381) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes received so

Hi Guys, Gals. Ok, so I have latest CVS sources on a debian box, 2.6.10-1-386 kernel kernel headers isntalled in the right plauce and all that stuff .. but whatever I try .. same results, I only need to get ztdummy working for a conference .. but I always end up stuffed :( heres the compile: robin@debian:~/zaptel$ make linux26 cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE

LD [M] /root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST *** Warning: "register_wanec_iface" [/root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "unregister_wanec_iface" [/root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.ko] undefined! CC /root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.mod.o LD [M]

I''m a newbie. :) I followed the steps written by Jerone Young: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10562241 but i found an error at the 17th step: 17. mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.6.10-xen0.img 2.6.10-xen0 it said:"No module ata_piix found for kernel 2.6.10-xen0, aborting." so I commented the line of "module /boot/initrd-2.6.10-xen0.img" in the

I am unable to compile the zaptel drivers on the latest kernel for fc 3, I get the following errors which are listed below if anyone has any suggestions on how I can solve this issue aside from trying a different distro, please don't hesitate to offer. Thanks in advance. [root@asterisk-test2 zaptel]# make linux26 make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel modules make[1]:

We''ve run into a couple of bugs deemed "must fix" for puppet 2.6.10. Thus we will be delaying the 2.6.10 rc until these are fixed. We are hoping to have them squashed within the next week. As a reminder, 2.6.10 is the last planned release in the 2.6 branch of Puppet. For more background on 2.6.10 see:

All, I have FC3 fedora core 3 and just installed and compiled 2.6.10. after rebooting I attempted to recompile zaptel-1.0.3. I did a make clean then make. I got the following errors. Any suggestions? ------------------------------- /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/torisa.c:1139: warning: 'set_tor_base' defined but not used CC [M] /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcusb.o CC [M]

-----Original Message----- From: David Petruzzella [mailto:dpetruzz@smartcarpet.com] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:30 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Issue compiling zaptel on FC 3 kernel 2.6.10-1.737 I am unable to compile the zaptel drivers on the latest kernel for fc 3, I get the following errors which are listed below if anyone has any suggestions on

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2734 ------- Additional Comments From vanes002@umn.edu 2005-05-21 22:15 ------- Your rsync options (-arRWxn) include -n, so nothing is actually going to get deleted on the destination, even though rsync reports that they are being deleted (which is what -n is for - i.e. to preview what will happen). -- Configure bugmail:

A merged patch usable on 2.6.10 has been placed in: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC/ipsec-nat-2.6.10.patch ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/IPSEC/ipsec-nat-2.6.10.patch This patch was posted today on the Netfilter Development list -- I have not tested it. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net

Hello, now on my box I have Shorewall 2.0.7 who work fine but I want upgrade kernel to version 2.6.10 + Grsecurity, somebody have any problem with shorewall on this kernel? I read on one site that on this kernel APF don`t want work, APF users must change MONOKERN="0" to MONOKERN="1"! Shorewall? Thanks Sorry if my english bad! -- Best regards, Ratko

Hello, I have a big startproblem with the dom0 kernel. I use the latest stable xen with the 2.6.10 kernel. menu.lst: --- title Xen 2.05 / XenLinux 2.6.10 kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=512M noreboot module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10-xen0 root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 --- Starterror: --- (XEN) Initial guest OS requires too much space (XEN) (8MB is greater than 0MB limit) --- System: I use an fresh