search for: 2.3

Hello, I?m trying to install PIL (Python Image Library) in a CentOS-4.4, but I?m getting the follow error after unpack the tarball: ------------------------------- # python setup.py install running install running build running build_py creating build creating build/lib.linux-i686-2.3 copying PIL/ExifTags.py -> build/lib.linux-i686-2.3 copying PIL/ImageTransform.py ->

I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of LLVM 2.3. I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location: C:\cygwin\home\czhao\ResearchTools\LLVM\2.3\obj2.3>make make[1]: Entering directory

I have a new instruction that takes 2 labels, and in SelectionDAGISel, I have it doing "CurMBB->addSuccessor()" for both machine blocks. The DAG node it creates also takes both blocks as SDOperands. When I lower to x86, the not-fallthrough block disappears. If I run llc with --fast, the blocks stay around, so it must be an optimization pass of some sort that doesn't realize my

Hello All, I am new to R and am having a problem. I have the following 29 x 5 array called temp with a mode "list". Sincere Exciting Competent Sophisticated Rugged 3.5 2.5 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.0 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.3 2.8 3.0 2.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 4.0 2.8 1.5 4.5 2.5 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.3

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote: > I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 > and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of > LLVM 2.3. > I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 > and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location: > >

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Edd Barrett <vext01 at gmail.com> wrote: > gcc4.2 works fine. But it only works fine for svn snapshots. Your most recent release does not build on OpenBSD with gcc-4.2. llvm[3]: Building ARM.td instruction selector implementation with tblgen assertion "getOperator()->isSubClassOf("SDNodeXForm") && "Unknown node

Is the following developed in my console output a recognized bug or am I using the cat function incorrectly? Thanks, Stan > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{print("yes")},{print("no")}) [1] "yes" [1] "yes" > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{cat("yes")},{cat("no")}) yesError in ans[test & !nas] <-

For anyone to have any shot of answering your question, you need to provide more information. To start, please figure out which pass deleted the block, what does the machine function looks like before and after. Evan On Sep 19, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Edward Lee wrote: > I have a new instruction that takes 2 labels, and in SelectionDAGISel, > I have it doing

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1858 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1858.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 44c4a9c1d76fd1d64fb959a58507b15d3137d102848ee46929180dd618d2aebd systemtap-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:00:24PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Edd Barrett <vext01 at gmail.com> wrote: > > gcc4.2 works fine. > > But it only works fine for svn snapshots. Your most recent release > does not build on OpenBSD with gcc-4.2. > > llvm[3]: Building ARM.td instruction selector implementation with tblgen > assertion

I need to generate a minimal Samba working in a SH4 cpu in a STLinux 2.3 environment. The goal is to have very very simple Samba server running in a STLinux environment. STLinux Kernel has included the CIFS support. Really I'm a newbie in Samba cross-compilation. And obviously I've problems :-( Any help will be appreciated. Thanks :-) 1) First of all I've set some env vars: export

Hi I am trying to upgrde ?out openldap ver 2.3 ?to the lastest version 2.4, howevre there is no rpm avaibale for 2.4 so i decide to create my own for centOS flavour 5.2 here is the ?part look of my spec file openldap.spec Summary: openldap Installer Name: openldap Version: 2.4 Release: 1 Vendor: net Solutions License: Commercial Group: ms6 BuildRoot: /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/openldap Provides:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: New squid packages available to fix FTP-based DoS Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:113-02 Issue date: 2001-09-25 Updated on: 2001-09-27 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: squid FTP DoS Cross references: Obsoletes:

On 29.03.2018 10:36, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On 29 March 2018 at 09:43, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi > <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>> wrote: > > > > On 28.03.2018 22:14, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >> >> On 27 March 2018 at 20:06, <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi >> <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>>

Hi, I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director and after also Backend. Can works fine a ring of director with mixed 2.2 and 2.3 version? Mi idea is to setup a new Director server with 2.3, stop one server with 2.2 and insert the new 2.3 in the current ring to check if works fine. If all

Julien Lerouge wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote: > >> I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 >> and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of >> LLVM 2.3. >> I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 >> and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: New squid packages available to fix FTP-based DoS Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:113-03 Issue date: 2001-09-25 Updated on: 2001-10-16 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: squid FTP DoS Cross references: Obsoletes:

On 29.03.2018 13:14, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On 29 March 2018 at 13:04, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi > <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>> wrote: > > > > On 29.03.2018 10:36, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >> >> On 29 March 2018 at 09:43, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi >> <mailto:aki.tuomi at

On 28.03.2018 22:14, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On 27 March 2018 at 20:06, <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi > <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>> wrote: > > Hi! > > We are releasing v2.3.1, which mostly consists of bug fixes for > 2.3.0, and few improvements. This is also available via > https://repo.dovecot.org if you want packages. libsodium

Dear R users, [in case the format of email is changed or you dont finf it easy to understand, i have attached a text file of my question] i have the data in the following format and i want to convert it in the format given at the end. Ta ans Sa are the names of certain cities. there are 69 cities in my data. column 1 is representing station name (i am writing the data of only two cities for