Hi, I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director and after also Backend. Can works fine a ring of director with mixed 2.2 and 2.3 version? Mi idea is to setup a new Director server with 2.3, stop one server with 2.2 and insert the new 2.3 in the current ring to check if works fine. If all works fine I will replace all Director 2.2 with 2.3 version. Thanks -- Alessio Cecchi Postmaster @ http://www.qboxmail.it https://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190718/14ab1acc/attachment.html>
On 18 Jul 2019, at 11.44, Alessio Cecchi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:> > Hi, > > I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) > > Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director and after also Backend. > > Can works fine a ring of director with mixed 2.2 and 2.3 version? > > Mi idea is to setup a new Director server with 2.3, stop one server with 2.2 and insert the new 2.3 in the current ring to check if works fine. > > If all works fine I will replace all Director 2.2 with 2.3 version. >There's no known reason why it wouldn't work. But be prepared in case there is an unknown reason. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190718/6f5fef44/attachment.html>
Il 18/07/19 21:42, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:> On 18 Jul 2019, at 11.44, Alessio Cecchi via dovecot > <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a setup with 3 Dovecot Director v2.2.36 and >> director_consistent_hashing = yes ;-) >> >> Now I would like to upgrade to 2.3.7, first only Director and after >> also Backend. >> >> Can works fine a ring of director with mixed 2.2 and 2.3 version? >> >> Mi idea is to setup a new Director server with 2.3, stop one server >> with 2.2 and insert the new 2.3 in the current ring to check if works >> fine. >> >> If all works fine I will replace all Director 2.2 with 2.3 version. >> > > There's no known reason why it wouldn't work. But be prepared in case > there is an unknown reason.Hi, one server of the ring is now running Dovecot 2.3.7 and works fine with the others Dovecot 2.2 since 3 days. I notice only that the load avarage of this CentOS 7 server is higher compared with CentOS 6 and Dovecot 2.2, but I don't know if is related to the new operating system or Dovecot (hardware is the same). If I do not encounter problems in the next days I will also update the other Directors. Thanks -- Alessio Cecchi Postmaster @ http://www.qboxmail.it https://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190722/7db56f5c/attachment-0001.html>