search for: 2.1

LLVMers, The LLVM 2.1 pre-release version2 is now available: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version2/ You can help test this pre-release by doing one of the following: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.

On Saturday 15 September 2007, Tanya Lattner wrote: > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). I tried to do this, but ran into trouble. LLVM itself compiled fine. GCC compilation is broken when Java support is enabled. I can file a detailed bug report

Updates on this: 1) Making progress in the related Dev list thread here: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2019-June/007440.html I’ll keep that thread up to date with progress as I go. But if there are specific things it would make sense to test here, just let me know. Otherwise, I figure reducing redundancy makes sense? 2) I tried disabling usbcore.autosuspend, but

Is the following developed in my console output a recognized bug or am I using the cat function incorrectly? Thanks, Stan > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{print("yes")},{print("no")}) [1] "yes" [1] "yes" > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{cat("yes")},{cat("no")}) yesError in ans[test & !nas] <-

Hi Greg, I haven’t but I will give that a shot later this week and advise. Thanks for the tip. Thank you, David Zomaya Technical Support [cid:image007.png at 01D525AF.B38D63F0] 1111 W. 35th Street | Chicago, IL 60609 USA 773.869.1156 | david_zomaya at tripplite.com [cid:image008.png at 01D525AF.B38D63F0]<http://www.tripplite.com/> From: Nut-upsuser

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: Can you try it again without bison with these files:

More bison woes. llvm-2.1 + the patch Chris mentioned builds without bison, but llvm-gcc4 doesn't: /home/emil/ll/llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/missing bison -d -o gengtype-yacc.c ../../llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/gcc/gengtype-yacc.y WARNING: `bison' missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.y' file. You may need the `Bison' package in order for

I have 4 years of data and for each year, I have initialize the value so now for fitting the model, I want to remove the initial value and get the model based on remaining data set. Could anyone can help on this? I want to get linear model based on fourth column and 13th column but need to remove the initial value for each year and each treatment ( the second column I have 1:36) . Thank you,

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got:

Hi, I am having some difficulties building llvm on Itanium. My procedure for building LLVM is: cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1 ./configure make ENABLE_OPTIZED=1 cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/obj /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/configure --prefix=/liberty/llvm.ia64/install --enable-llvm=/liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-shared The build of llvm seems to

how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for pkcs11-helper but i've already installing [root at vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz hata: Failed build dependencies: pkcs11-helper-devel is needed by openvpn-2.1.1-1.x86_64 [root at vpn VpnSetup]# rpm -ivh pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm uyar??: pkcs11-helper-devel-1.06-2.1.x86_64.rpm:

>> Dear All, I have been trying for days but still cannot break this barrier. May I get your help? I have compiled llvm-2.1 successfully and make install. When I proceed with llvm-gcc-4.2-2.1, however, I keep getting linking error as attached. Some functions with totally different content conflict with each other in linking process. That is a Linux box (Debian, with 2.6.23-1

> LLVM-GCC 4.0 fails on Cygwin, possibly due to lack of symbolic links. I am trying with llvm-gcc-4.2 from svn. Aaron

Hello, I often find myself writing code like : if( require( "foo" ) && compareVersion( packageDescription( "foo")[["Version"]], "2.1" ) < 0 ){ # code that uses version 2.1 of foo } else { stop( "could not load version >= 2.1 of foo" ) } Would it make sense to include something like this in require, library, etc ... require(

Hi, I've figured out a little more. #if defined DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO || XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO guards the declaration of type_queue, however, neither is defined on Intanium. In gt-dbxout.h type_queue's uses are unguarded and thus are undefined on Itanium. When I compared llvm-gcc's gt-dbxout.h with FSF gcc's, I found that type_queue was never used in FSF gcc's version. Does

I am trying to build the llvm-gcc frontend. I think I have followed the directions correctly. I am using cygwin on XP SP2 (uname -a reports: CYGWIN_NT-5.1 pad7 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2007-12-14 19:21 i686 Cygwin) gcc --version reports: gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) Since there is no binary for llvm-gcc I am following the directions in the tar file for the 4.2 version. -

Antony Blakey wrote: > On 24/11/2007, at 12:01 AM, Michael T. Richter wrote: > > >> Does anybody have a working version of LLVM 2.1+ (ideally in a .deb >> file) that they're willing to share? I'm having some weird problems >> trying to get a working version on my 7.10 machine. >> > > Or even better, does anyone have a recipe for building on

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, laurent <lgautier at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 12:00 +0200, r-devel-request at r-project.org wrote: >> Message: 18 >> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:35:18 -0500 (CDT) >> From: Luke Tierney <luke at stat.uiowa.edu> >> Subject: Re: [Rd] Attributes of top level environments clobbered (was >> Re: [R]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt Here's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb) where #0 0x0853d606 in

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download