search for: 1.1

Hi, I'm using rsnapshot 1.3.1 on a Synology Diskstation ds 107+. # uname -a Linux ds107 2.6.15 #832 Sat Mar 7 00:44:45 CST 2009 armv5tejl GNU/Linux rsnpahot uses rsync, on my box there is: # rsync --version rsync version 3.0.6 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2009 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit

I am using a "for" loop to read a table row by row and I have to specify how many records are there in the table. I need to read row by row because the table is huge and the memory not large enough for the whole table.: number.of.records=100 fp=file("abc.csv","r") pos=seek(fp, rw="read") for (i in 1:number.of.record){ current.row=scan(file=fp,

Is the following developed in my console output a recognized bug or am I using the cat function incorrectly? Thanks, Stan > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{print("yes")},{print("no")}) [1] "yes" [1] "yes" > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{cat("yes")},{cat("no")}) yesError in ans[test & !nas] <-

I tried to get icecast2 and BLAMO Error: Failed to spawn GNU rlog on '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//Makefile.in,v' '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//acconfig.h,v' '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//commandline.c,v' '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//commandline.h,v' '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//commands.c,v' '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//commands.h,v' '/cvsroot/icecast-1.1//config.h.in,v'

I''m following merb trunk. This morning I updated my gems, sync''d merb source and installed the merb gem from source. I don''t know if I did something wrong, or if a new gem messed things up, or if there was a merb change which broke something. Now I get this error: Request: REQUEST_URI: / (2007-11-05 20:27:04) Params: {"action"=>"index",

I know that Rails 1.1-RC1 has many new features but it also seems to fix numerous bugs found in Rails 1.1. So for new projects--say a small (<=10 product) ecommerce website set to launch "any day now", should we use Rails 1.0 or 1.1-RC1? Which is more bug-free? I heard 1.1-RC1 gets rid of the ''white screen of death'' but I''m wondering if any new bugs

Hi, here's a small list of things that need to be done, and the version when it should be ready. smartcard support 1.1 LDAP support 1.1 public/private keys for authentication 1.1 don't store passphrases in files that are called after IP addresses 1.0 use names to identify

Hi, I was hoping someone could help figure out how to write code for R to do the below. I have data that looks like below. Variables, sid and pid are strings, slope is numeric. I need R to get me the mean of slopes for all pid's nested within each sid if there are more than one pid's nested within sid. If there is only pid for a sid, like for 2.1 below, I want R to write a 0. In the

Hi all. For those that didn't know it, the OpenSSH portable team has been collecting survey data about the platforms that it runs and the options that it is built with. Partitipation is entirely voluntary and is as simple as running "make send-survey" after building (see the INSTALL file for details and caveats). I've used the data to answer a couple of questions on this list

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc12.tar.gz.sig Sorry, one more RC because of the mbox+quota bug. v1.1.0 still planned for tomorrow. - mbox: Don't give "Can't find next message offset" warnings when plugin (e.g. quota) accesses the message being saved. - deliver: Settings inside protocol imap {}

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc12.tar.gz.sig Sorry, one more RC because of the mbox+quota bug. v1.1.0 still planned for tomorrow. - mbox: Don't give "Can't find next message offset" warnings when plugin (e.g. quota) accesses the message being saved. - deliver: Settings inside protocol imap {}

On startup of dovecot 1.1b2 I seem to have some permission trouble. Dovecot was configured with --prefix=/usr/local/dovecot-1.1 for testing purposes while dovecot 1.0.2 is in production. # cd /usr/local/dovecot-1.1/sbin/ # ./dovecot -F -c ../etc/dovecot.conf Enet_connect_unix(/usr/local/dovecot-1.1/var/run/dovecot/dict-server) failed: Permission denied # ls -la

Hi, I was very excited to hear that Rails 1.1 project has been released. It gave me the fire I need to get started on a pet project I''ve been thinking about. However I have a couple apps that don''t seem to play nice with Rails 1.1, mainly Typo. So my question is: How can I install Rails 1.1 for only a new application? thanks, scott.

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz.sig v1.1.0 will be released on next Friday if nothing horrible happens. * LIST X-STATUS renamed to LIST STATUS and fixed its behavior with LIST-EXTENDED options. It's now compatible with STATUS-IN-LIST draft 00. - Message parsing could have sometimes produced

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz.sig v1.1.0 will be released on next Friday if nothing horrible happens. * LIST X-STATUS renamed to LIST STATUS and fixed its behavior with LIST-EXTENDED options. It's now compatible with STATUS-IN-LIST draft 00. - Message parsing could have sometimes produced

Where do I get oddcast at? I did a search on winamp.com and nothing and I did a google group lookup to see if anyone was talking about it and I got back everything but what I was looking for. Michael Smith wrote: > > At 07:02 AM 3/17/02 -0600, you wrote: > >I have icecast on my linux box (still trying to figure out how to do a name and not unknown) and it > >works fine with

Hi Rails team Learning ROR, and is doing the chapter with test..... feel like skipping this, but.... (using NetBeans IDE 6.1) I have created this story_test.rb, and when I run the ''rake test:units (selected from the GUI), I get this error: (in /data/NewOrder/Projects/ROR/shovell) ** Invoke test:units (first_time) ** Invoke db:test:prepare (first_time) ** Invoke environment

Hello, We've been using Opus for VoIP calls in Jitsi and we're very happy with the sound quality it provides. Thank you for the great work! We are thinking of updating to 1.1-beta and wanted to know if there's any reason not to do so at this point, and wait for the 1.1 release instead. Is the beta expected to be as stable as the 1.0.x series, or are there any known flaws still to

This release imports the libXfont 1.x BDF-reading and PCF-writing code, as this program is the only known user of that code and libXfont 1.x is otherwise unmaintained. No functional difference should be apparent, this is just another step towards eliminating the old version of libXfont from the world. Adam Jackson (3): Import libXfont's BDF-to-PCF code Import more libXfont 1.x

This release fixes a race condition where an existing authority file would be unlinked (possibly causing other clients to fail to connect), and fixes sorting and merging of authority file entries. Adam Jackson (2): process: Close a window where no authority file would exist xauth 1.1 Alan Coopersmith (3): Change fall through comment in process.c to match gcc's requirements