search for: 2.0.10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages that I uploaded earlier were unfortunately incorrect. I have uploaded the correct packages. The incorrect md5sums are: 14e8f2bfa08cc5ca2715c8b1179d5eb2 shorewall-2.0.10-1.noarch.rpm 54bcbb2216ad3db9870507cd9716fd99 shorewall-2.0.10.tgz c2fe0acc7f056acb56d089cf8dafa39a shorwall-2.0.10.lrp The correct md5sums are:

Hello I''m trying to install shorewall 2.0.10 install on slackware10 the installation script gives the following error (which is ok since slackware uses /etc/rc.d/rc.local) but then it doesn''t create the directories /etc/shorewall or /usr/share/shorewall root@brujula5:~/shorewall-2.0.10# ./install.sh Installing Shorewall Version 2.0.10 shorewall control program installed in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 Nothing Earth-shattering here and there is no reason to upgrade if you are not seeing one of the corrected problems. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems corrected in version 2.0.10 1) The

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1242 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1242.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 250770bedd173603e9082bd4ec9d47f0ecefeb7b404a1fa4b055716abde18c54 gimp-2.2.13-2.0.10.el5.i386.rpm

What version of shorewall do you suggest I try on a FC3 system? TIA, /ChJ

RedHat 7.1 running FreeS/WAN and Samba 2.0.10 connects to a DHCP Win2k server box using ipsec. At first I was implementing Samba 2.0.7 as a WINS server and was encountering a problem where 'smbclient -M W2kserver' and 'smbclient -L W2kserver' (where W2kserver is netbios name of w2k box) would give me Win2k side server stats/send message to win2k box, but I could not ping

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

OK Ladies and Gentlemen I could use a hand on this one. I'm new to the list, so please excuse me if I violate a protocol which is as yet unknown to me. However I am having some problems that seem to be beyond my abilities to find a solution to. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Technical Info: LINUX Box is a Red Hat 7.1 Kernel version is 2.4.9-34. Samba version(S) that I am

I've been using 2.0.x on my servers for a couple of years & am a very, very happy customer (thanks Samba team). There are only 2, albiet small, annoyances. 1) Any account administration results in changes having to be made on both the NT domain & linux server. 2) I can't do permissions for a "group of groups" on the linux server. It seems that winbind might be able to

Well as a further to my last, I broke down and put a copy of Win98SE on a spare HDD in my Mandrake server box. First moment it was up and running, I tried to transfer the files between the two problem computers and BINGO! It worked. So sadly I must assume that the problem must lie on my Linux server :( As I have previously tried both Mandrake 8.0 and Redhat 7.1 and end up with the same transfer

I''m noticing some weirdness in my ulog files with version 2.0.10. Here is a portion of the log: Jan 7 11:01:37 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:0a:95:b2:11:4c:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.100 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=97 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=44155 CE PROTO=UDP SPT=631 DPT=631 LEN=77 Jan 7 11:01:39 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=

Well the weekend didn't bring any solutions to this unhappy camper. I spent most of my time trying to narrow down the problem again. I started out by installing a quick copy of ZipSlack on the Win98SE machine to determine once and for all if the problem was a Windows problem or not. Well, I tried a simple FTP from the ZipSlack to my Mandrake 8.0 server and it hung up like in Windows. So I

Hello Guys, I'm having a very strange problem with my file server ( latest samba RPM from redhat ) [root@krusty secundarias]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-client-2.0.10-2 samba-2.0.10-2 samba-common-2.0.10-2 [root@krusty samba]# uname -r 2.2.19 One of our machines ( NT4 workstation with SP6a ) is saving files on a share that becames unacessible for all users. After some research on

Not subscribed to the list so this may be a repeat. Running instal.sh gave error ./install.sh: line 543: -n: command not found install.sh line 543 was if -n "$first_install" ]; then should be if [ -n "$first_install" ]; then -- Russ Moore System Administrator

Thanks for the answers so far but I haven't been able to come up with an solution yet :( Some new info (see bottom of email for history): 1. I upgraded to 2.0.10 on my Mandrake 8.0, no change to the transfer problem. 2. I attempted to ftp a file from the Win 98SE PC to my Samba Server, didn't work. So I can assume that it is not specifically Samba problem. 3. I have changed the NIC cards

Basic question, but where is the readme or documentation on how to apply the samba patches? - I've always installed the complete versions.... But now I need to stay at 2.0.10, and need to apply the 2.0.10a patch. Could someone point me at a help file or give the command I need to run? Thanks.

I have two openvz servers running Centos 6.x both with 32GB of RAM. One is an Intel Xeon E3-1230 quad core with two 4TB 7200 SATA drives in software RAID1. The other is an old HP DL380 dual quad core with 8 750GB 2.5" SATA drives in hardware RAID6. I want to figure out which one has better random I/O performance to host a busy container. The DL380 currently has one failed drive in the

Hi! Sorry my late answer. I did run the sysvolcheck/reset commands and everything seems fine. On my server I use the following rpm packages, installed from the tranquil.it repository. ldb-tools.x86_64 2.0.10-1.el7?????????????????? @samba_custom libldb.x86_64?????????????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom libldb-devel.x86_64???????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom

Hello everyone, We are having some troubles since we updated dovecot from 2.0.10 to 2.1.6. With 2.0.10 with messages with this headers: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Showed the special characters fine. However, with this new version, there are special characters that are not correctly showed. For example: "Su c=F3digo de

In the panic of replacing our firewall(s) earlier in the week, we ended up moving our original shorewall 1.4 config onto a machine with 2.0.10 already installed, overwriting all the 2.0.10 config files. Most things seem to work fine, except for our masq entries. I''ve examined the default 2.0.10 files compared with our 1.4 files, and can''t spot the problem. What am I missing?