search for: 1e20

...eveloping this great software! Thomas Example: ######## set.seed(357) z1 <- matrix(runif(100, -1e-180, 1e-180), nrow = 10) contour(z1) # ok z2 <- matrix(c(runif(50, -1, 1), runif(50, -1e-180, 1e-180)), nrow = 10) contour(z2) # Error in contour.default(z) : k != 2 or 4 contour(z2 * 1e20) # 20 worked, 19 produced error contour(round(z2, 179)) # rounding to 179 digits works but not 180 > sessionInfo() R Under development (unstable) (2013-09-11 r63910) Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=German_Germany.1252 LC_CTYPE=German_Germany.1252 [3]...

Hi people, I need to prove the good quality of numerical accuracy of R. Anyone knows a paper or anything else comparing R to other statistical softwares in terms of numerical accuracy. I've made a long search about that but I found nothing. Please help me!! Thanx, Talita Leite ------------------------------------------------- Este e-mail foi enviado pelo Webmail da UFAL IMP:

...,c(1,ns,1)) # can't call compiled with 0 length arrays u <- matrix(0,sampleT,1) G <- matrix(0,ns,1) } else {C <-model$C u <- input.data(data) G <- matrix(0,ns,ms) } x <-model$parms h0 <- abs(d*x)+eps*(x==0.0) D <- matrix(1e20, n,(length(x)*(length(x) + 3))/2) Daprox <- matrix(0,n,r) Hdiag <- matrix(0,n,length(x)) Haprox <- matrix(0,n,r) storage.mode(D) <-"double" storage.mode(Daprox)<-"double" storage.mode(Haprox)<-"double" storage.mode(Hdiag )...

Hi, I have a dataset which has around 138 variables and 30,000 cases. I am trying to calculate a mahalanobis distance matrix for them and my procedure is like this: Suppose my data is stored in mymatrix > S<-cov(mymatrix) # this is fine > D<-sapply(1:nrow(mymatrix), function(i) mahalanobis(mymatrix, mymatrix[i,], S)) Error in solve.default(cov, ...) : system is computationally

Dear R, If I have remembered correctly, a square matrix is singular if and only if its determinant is zero. I am a bit confused by the following code error. Can someone give me a hint? > a <- matrix(c(1e20,1e2,1e3,1e3),2) > det(a) [1] 1e+23 > solve(a) Error in solve.default(a) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 1e-17 Thanks in advance! Feng -- Feng Li Department of Statistics Stockholm University 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden http://feng.li/ [[alternative H...

violating.runs I read from the news cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2004-1.pdf that the criteria for the violating is 5 but 1)I cannot find "5" in the code of the function. Where is the "5" ? 2)What is the easiest way to change it ? 3)Is there any more criterias made somewhere ? Yours sincerelly, Tommi Viitanen

Dear Lister, I am facing a strange problem fitting a GLM of the negative binomial family. Actually, I tried to estimate theta (the scale parameter) through glm.nb from MASS and could get convergence only relaxing the convergence tolerance to 1e-3. With warning messages: glm1<-glm.nb(nbcas~.,data=zonesdb4,control=glm.control(epsilon = 1e-3)) There were 25 warnings (use warnings() to see

...olumns contain activities that we are displaying now? + * -1 == unused column, else index of an activity + */ + CLEANUP_FREE ssize_t *columns = NULL; + const size_t nr_columns = nr_activities; + size_t last_free_column = 0; + + size_t i, j; + double smallest_next_t; + const double MAX_T = 1e20; + + columns = malloc (nr_columns * sizeof (ssize_t)); + if (columns == NULL) error (EXIT_FAILURE, errno, "malloc"); + for (j = 0; j < nr_columns; ++j) + columns[j] = -1; + + for (;;) { + /* Find the next significant time to display, which is a time when + * some activity...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 Bug ID: 103721 Summary: Frequent freezes with nouveau on Thinkpad P50 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

v4: - Lots more analysis of the /init script and other parts. - Display a list of the longest to shortest activities. - Rebase on top of current head. Rich.

...46] pci 0000:00:1a.0: [8086:1e2d] type 00 class 0x0c0320 [ 0.357667] pci 0000:00:1a.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xf3a3a000-0xf3a3a3ff] [ 0.357759] pci 0000:00:1a.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.357789] pci 0000:00:1a.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI [ 0.357832] pci 0000:00:1b.0: [8086:1e20] type 00 class 0x040300 [ 0.357850] pci 0000:00:1b.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xf3a30000-0xf3a33fff 64bit] [ 0.357926] pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.357960] pci 0000:00:1b.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI [ 0.358005] pci 0000:00:1c.0: [8086:1e10] type 01 class 0x0604...

...0f 64bit] pci 0000:00:16.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1a.0: [8086:1e2d] type 00 class 0x0c0320 pci 0000:00:1a.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xb3619000-0xb36193ff] pci 0000:00:1a.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1a.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI pci 0000:00:1b.0: [8086:1e20] type 00 class 0x040300 pci 0000:00:1b.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xb3610000-0xb3613fff 64bit] pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1b.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI pci 0000:00:1c.0: [8086:1e10] type 01 class 0x060400 pci 0000:00:1c.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci...

...00 [ 316.547315] RBP: ffff8801cf424d00 R08: 0000000000008000 R09: ffff8801d573c000 [ 316.547395] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8801e8aae4a0 R12: ffff8801cfde77d8 [ 316.547476] R13: 0000000cc1c00000 R14: ffff8801cfde77e0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 316.547558] FS: 00007f98a7abb7e0(0000) GS:ffff88021e200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 316.547649] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 316.547715] CR2: ffffffffff600400 CR3: 00000001cf4ff000 CR4: 00000000001407f0 [ 316.547796] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 316.547878] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR...

...pci 0000:00:16.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.259142] pci 0000:00:1a.0: [8086:1e2d] type 00 class 0x0c0320 [ 0.259161] pci 0000:00:1a.0: reg 10: [mem 0xf7d18000-0xf7d183ff] [ 0.259245] pci 0000:00:1a.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.259272] pci 0000:00:1b.0: [8086:1e20] type 00 class 0x040300 [ 0.259286] pci 0000:00:1b.0: reg 10: [mem 0xf7d10000-0xf7d13fff 64bit] [ 0.259349] pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.259374] pci 0000:00:1c.0: [8086:1e10] type 01 class 0x060400 [ 0.259503] pci 0000:00:1c.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D...

...72] pci 0000:00:1a.0: [8086:1e2d] type 00 class 0x0c0320 [ 0.264022] pci 0000:00:1a.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xc1c16c00-0xc1c16fff] [ 0.264146] pci 0000:00:1a.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.264397] pci 0000:00:1a.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI [ 0.264537] pci 0000:00:1b.0: [8086:1e20] type 00 class 0x040300 [ 0.264585] pci 0000:00:1b.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xc1c10000-0xc1c13fff 64bit] [ 0.264693] pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.264838] pci 0000:00:1b.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI [ 0.264971] pci 0000:00:1c.0: [8086:1e10] type 01 class 0x0604...

Hi developers, I met some domU issues and the log suggests missing interrupt. Details from here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/263938#263938 In summary, this is the suspicious log: (XEN) vmsi.c:122:d32767 Unsupported delivery mode 3 I''ve checked the code in question and found that mode 3 is an ''reserved_1'' mode. I want to trace down the source of this

Lots of changes since v2, too much to remember or summarize. Please ignore patch 11/11, it's just for my testing. Rich.

...55] pci 0000:00:1a.0: [8086:1e2d] type 00 class 0x0c0320 [ 0.313805] pci 0000:00:1a.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xed93a000-0xed93a3ff] [ 0.313925] pci 0000:00:1a.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.313994] pci 0000:00:1a.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI [ 0.314068] pci 0000:00:1b.0: [8086:1e20] type 00 class 0x040300 [ 0.314126] pci 0000:00:1b.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xed930000-0xed933fff 64bit] [ 0.314245] pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold [ 0.314328] pci 0000:00:1b.0: System wakeup disabled by ACPI [ 0.314398] pci 0000:00:1c.0: [8086:1e10] type 01 class 0x0604...

Hello, following up on myself, it was suggested on IRC that I better attach a dmesg output. Here's the output of a clean boot & echo 0f > /sys/.../pstate cycle. I can't spot a message that relates to the reclock action, and there's only one weird "nouveau 0000:04:00.0: clk: base: 7 MHz, boost: 7 MHz" message. On the other hand: # cat

v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-March/thread.html#00157 Not running the 'hwclock' command reduces boot times considerably. However I'm not sure if it is safe. See the question I posted on qemu-devel: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/402194 At the moment, about 50% of the time is consumed by SeaBIOS. Of this, about ⅓rd is SGABIOS