Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "187494".
Did you mean:
17494
2019 Feb 08
1
Samba and ufw (mmcg29440@frontier.com)
...0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0016 LEN=76 TC=0 HOPLIMIT=1 FLOWLBL=0 PROTO=ICMPv6 TYPE=143 CODE=0 MARK=0xd4
Feb 6 08:49:22 radio kernel: [ 41.575975] [UFW AUDIT] IN= OUT=enp2s5 SRC=fe80:0000:0000:0000:368d:74dd:abec:eba0 DST=ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:00fb LEN=93 TC=0 HOPLIMIT=255 FLOWLBL=187494 PROTO=UDP SPT=5353 DPT=5353 LEN=53
Feb 6 08:49:22 radio kernel: [ 41.575990] [UFW ALLOW] IN= OUT=enp2s5 SRC=fe80:0000:0000:0000:368d:74dd:abec:eba0 DST=ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:00fb LEN=93 TC=0 HOPLIMIT=255 FLOWLBL=187494 PROTO=UDP SPT=5353 DPT=5353 LEN=53
Feb 6 08:49:22 radio kernel:...
2009 Dec 31
6
zvol (slow) vs file (fast) performance snv_130
Hello,
I was doing performance testing, validating zvol performance in particularly, and found that zvol write performance to be slow ~35-44MB/s at 1MB blocksize writes. I then tested the underlying zfs file system with the same test and got 121MB/s. Is there any way to fix this? I really would like to have compatible performance between the zfs filesystem and the zfs zvols.
# first test is a