search for: 17494

...Before the next release we really should to sort out the bias issue in > sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and > filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at > https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494. > > Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel: > > set.seed(123) > m <- (2/5) * 2^32 > x <- sample(m, 1000000, replace = TRUE) > table(x %% 2, x > m / 2) > ## > ## FALSE TRUE > ## 0 300620 198792 &gt...

Before the next release we really should to sort out the bias issue in sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494. Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel: set.seed(123) m <- (2/5) * 2^32 x <- sample(m, 1000000, replace = TRUE) table(x %% 2, x > m / 2) ## ## FALSE TRUE ## 0 300620 198792 ## 1 200196 300392 table(sample(2/7 * 2^...

...y should to sort out the bias issue in >>> sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in >>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and >>> filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at >>> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494. >>> >>> Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel: >>> >>> ????? set.seed(123) >>> ????? m <- (2/5) * 2^32 >>> ????? x <- sample(m, 1000000, replace = TRUE) >>> ????? table(x %% 2, x > m / 2) >>> ?...

...out the bias issue in >>>> sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in >>>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and >>>> filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at >>>> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494. >>>> >>>> Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel: >>>> >>>> ????? set.seed(123) >>>> ????? m <- (2/5) * 2^32 >>>> ????? x <- sample(m, 1000000, replace = TRUE) >>>> ????? table(x %%...

...release we really should to sort out the bias issue in >> sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in >> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and >> filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at >> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494. >> >> Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel: >> >> set.seed(123) >> m <- (2/5) * 2^32 >> x <- sample(m, 1000000, replace = TRUE) >> table(x %% 2, x > m / 2) >> ## >> ## FAL...

Dan Cropp wrote: > I had my screenshots flipped. Is there a way to make sure the Contact field is NOT included in the ACK response to the OK (for the Answer)? > > PJSIP is including the Contact for the ACK response to the OK. > Contact:<sip:1234 at xxx.xxx.xx.xxx:5060> > There is no configuration option to configure this behavior. What is the full SIP signaling? -- Joshua

...Agent: packetrino Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO Supported: replaces Contact: <sip:18005555555 at 64.2.142.192> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 240 v=0 o=root 32312 32312 IN IP4 64.2.142.192 s=session c=IN IP4 64.2.142.192 t=0 0 m=audio 17494 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:off - - - - a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv ? Phone is ringing. Next, I answer my cell phone <--- Received SIP response (830 bytes) from UDP:64.2.142.93:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP XXX.XXX...

https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 should have this fix. If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:...

...something? or is it a different issue? From: Atin Mukherjee [mailto:amukherj at redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM To: Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 should have this fix. If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:...

...Atin Mukherjee [mailto:amukherj at redhat.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM > *To:* Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> > *Cc:* gluster-users at gluster.org > *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing > > > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 > should have this fix. > > If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. > Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? > >...

I'm getting ready to submit an update of survival, and is my habit I run the checks on all packages that depend/import/suggest? survival.? I am getting some very odd behaviour wrt non-reproducability.? It came to a head when some things failed on one machine and worked on another.?? I found that the difference was that the failure was using the 3/27 release and the success was still on a

Hi, I have a gluster (version 3.10.2) server running on a 3 node (centos7) cluster. Firewalld and SELinux are disabled, and I see I can telnet from each node to the other on port 24007. When I try to create the first peering by running on node1 the command: gluster peer probe <node2 ip address> I get the error: "Connection failed. Please check if gluster daemon is operational."

...s email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and attachments please check them for viruses and defect. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Configuration-files.zip Type: application/octet-stream Size: 17494 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060614/a5d8f93d/Configuration-files.obj

...CANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES The default method for generating from a discrete uniform distribution (used in sample(), for instance) has been changed. This addresses the fact, pointed out by Ottoboni and Stark, that the previous method made sample() noticeably non-uniform on large populations. See PR#17494 for a discussion. The previous method can be requested using RNGkind() or RNGversion() if necessary for reproduction of old results. Thanks to Duncan Murdoch for contributing the patch and Gabe Becker for further assistance." If so, testing with export _R_RNG_VERSION_=3.5.0 might remove/...

...at redhat.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM >> *To:* Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> >> *Cc:* gluster-users at gluster.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing >> >> >> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of >> 3.10 should have this fix. >> >> If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. >> Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this g...

Hello, I have seen some odd behaviour of my Web Services code plus some ''similar'' postings to this list, so I believe this may be a bug in Rails. But I''m failry new to RoR, so maybe I''m doing something wrong. I''ll explain: I have a WS API defined, communicating with a remote system that expects a stucture: When defined like this (all

...Atin Mukherjee [mailto:amukherj at redhat.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM > *To:* Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> > *Cc:* gluster-users at gluster.org > *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing > > > > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 > should have this fix. > > If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. > Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? > >...

...redhat.com>] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM To: Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com<mailto:guyc at elminda.com>> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 should have this fix. If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:3...

...at redhat.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM >> *To:* Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com> >> *Cc:* gluster-users at gluster.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing >> >> >> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of >> 3.10 should have this fix. >> >> If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. >> Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this g...

...redhat.com>] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:56 AM To: Guy Cukierman <guyc at elminda.com<mailto:guyc at elminda.com>> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster peer probe failing https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17494/ will it and the next update of 3.10 should have this fix. If sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports has any value > short int range then this would be a problem with the current version. Would you be able to reset the reserved ports temporarily to get this going? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:3...