search for: 1814

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1814 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 583c451e1c1759ab60d296f761dd14f97e22107894fbfc8d0825ccc327caa050 ipmitool-1.8.11-12.el6_2.1.i...

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1814 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: afa35fdf0e34067da4922d16b1fa907aa1a60be806e6b8a0da2e9435b18291dc php-5.1.6-43.el5_10.i386.rpm...

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1814 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1814.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 11b560b8b12bef924870b17dd0580fe72624e17d692d7206870738a5999abbc6 iproute-2.6.32-33.el6_6.i686.rpm 7a29...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1814 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #11 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org&...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1814 Summary: Could we get --resume? Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org Re...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1814 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Priority|P3 |P5 Resolution|...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1814 Summary: scp get file prepends -- before filename Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: unas...

Fred, > smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting > User nobody ! Did you compile the samba sources by yourself with "--with-pam" or "--with-pam_smbpass" ? If so, better recompile the latest version 2.2.6 without pam support, since you most likely won't need pam. Optionally change the file "samba" in "/etc/pam.d" to something like:

Hello, suppose I want to use a special configuration for my IBM/1814 storage array luns, then I put something like this in multipath.conf devices { device { vendor "IBM" product "^1814" product_blacklist "Universal Xport" path_grouping_policy "group_by_prio&qu...

...n `poster_worker': rate_engine.c:653: warning: unused parameter `arg' rate_engine.c: In function `rates_reload': rate_engine.c:1802: warning: unused parameter `argc' rate_engine.c:1802: warning: unused parameter `argv' rate_engine.c: In function `rates_status': rate_engine.c:1814: warning: unused parameter `argc' rate_engine.c:1814: warning: unused parameter `argv' cc -O3 -W -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -g -fno-in line-functions -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/pcre -DWITH_MYSQL -I/usr/include/ mysql -c -o pcre_subst.o pcre_subst.c cc -g -fno...

...the most recent package, add /opt/thoughtwave/qemu/bin to your path, and the wrapper scripts there will automagically run the right binaries for your architecture. Have fun and Happy New Year, Jonathan Kalbfeld -- -- Jonathan Kalbfeld ThoughtWave Technologies LLC www.thoughtwave.com +1 424 354 1814 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/qemu-discuss/attachments/20080114/583abb07/attachment.html>

...: volume1.brick1.origin_path missing in payload [2024-09-29 07:24:32.924385 +0000] E [MSGID: 106061] [glusterd- snapshot-utils.c:1004:gd_import_new_brick_snap_details] 0-management: volume1.brick1.snap_type missing in payload [2024-09-29 07:24:43.516131 +0000] E [MSGID: 106048] [glusterd-op- sm.c:1814:glusterd_op_stage_status_volume] 0-management: Failed to get volinfo [{Volume=gv0}] [2024-09-29 07:24:43.516209 +0000] E [MSGID: 106301] [glusterd-op- sm.c:5870:glusterd_op_ac_stage_op] 0-management: Stage failed on operation 'Volume Status', Status : -1 [2024-09-29 07:24:43.524640 +0000]...

...15, 1.2505), .Names = c("1799", "1800", "1801", "1802", "1803", "1804", "1805", "1806", "1807", "1808", "1809", "1810", "1811", "1812", "1813", "1814", "1815", "1816", "1817", "1818", "1819", "1820", "1821", "1822", "1823", "1824", "1825", "1826", "1827", "1828", "1829", "1830", &quo...

...p' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2014:1814 CentOS 6 iproute BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2014:1813 CentOS 6 curl BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEEA-2014:1816 CentOS 6 openssl Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2014:1824 Important CentOS 5 php Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEBA-2014:1811 CentOS 7...

...survival analysis if (require("ipred")) { data("GBSG2", package = "ipred") GBSG2ct <- ctree(Surv(time, cens) ~ .,data = GBSG2) plot(GBSG2ct) treeresponse(GBSG2ct, newdata = GBSG2[1:2,]) } for the plot(GBSG2ct) line I get the following error: Error in Summary.Surv(c(1814, 2018, 712, 1807, 772, 448, 2172, 2161, 471, : Invalid operation on a survival time and for treeresponse(GBSG2ct, newdata = GBSG2[1:2,]) I get this error: Error: extends(class(y), "Surv") is not TRUE (I care more about treeresponse but assume it is related). Any help would be highl...

...208032, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/close.c:1134(rmdir_internals) rmdir_internals: couldn't remove directory wrk/anly/testfolder/New folder/New folder2 : Invalid argument [2023/03/15 10:59:21.285596, 5, pid=8606, effective(1617208032, 1617207642), real(1617208032, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/files.c:1814(file_free) file_free: freed files structure 0 (3 used) [2023/03/15 10:59:21.285611, 5, pid=8606, effective(1617208032, 1617207642), real(1617208032, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/close.c:1573(close_directory) close_directory: wrk/anly/testfolder/New folder/New folder2. Delete on close was set - de...

...1759 1760 1761 1762 [166] 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 [181] 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 [196] 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 [211] 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 [226] 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 [241] 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 [256] 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 [271] 1868 1869...

...hen I try to call the ATA -- Executing Dial("SIP/-080e8b58", "SIP/0@cisco1|20|Ttr") in new stack -- Called 0@cisco1 -- SIP/cisco1-f5b3 is ringing == Spawn extension (default, 9342199, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/-080e8b58' NOTICE[5126]: File chan_sip.c, Line 1814 (process_sdp): Content is 'multipart/mixed;boundary=uniqueBoundary', not 'application/sdp' -- Executing Dial("SIP/-080e8b58", "SIP/0@cisco1|20|Ttr") in new stack -- Called 0@cisco1 -- SIP/cisco1-426e is ringing == Spawn extension (default, 9342199,...

Dear all, I was intrigued by the ctree command and wanted to check it out. I first ran the demo with example(ctree) and did get the survival graphs in the end. Upon doing this with my own data and yielding a "Invalid operation on a survival time" I tried to rerun example(ctree) and now I also get "Invalid operation on a survival time" after the example runs plot(GBSG2ct)...

Hi, I could try latest 7zip (4.57) on a triple boot machine (Debian SID i386, x86_64 and native Windows XP SP2), and found something surprising in the results : amd64 at 2400MHz linux32 -> 1814 linux64 -> 1946 win32 -> 2004 So performance is much better in Linux 64 bit than in 32 bit, while both are slower than native windows system. Is it normal, I mean does anyone else obtain better performance on 64 bit Wine? Thanks Jos? *************************************************...