search for: 180mhz

The ''firewall'' and ''functions'' file in CVS together produce a 30%+ speedup of ''shorewall restart'' on my firewall when compared to 1.3.11a. Please test with these files -- I don''t anticipate making any more performance changes for 1.3.12 and I want to be sure that I didn''t break anything. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall

The ''firewall'' script currently in the /Shorewall CVS project: a) Is approximately 15% faster starting/restarting on my configuration -- please report your experiences with it. b) Reloads Traffic Control/Shaping as part of "shorewall refresh" c) Turns off the shell trace after an error has occured (except when the command being traced is "stop" or

...whats wrong with my configuration?? or is it a bug?? i checked the windows registry, but the parameters for SignOrSeal and the other stuff is okay. i use the traditional smbpasswd file. i tried the whole procedure on two machines: 1. RedHat 7.1 on a dual P3-800MHz 2. Irix 6.5 on a dual MIPS R10000-180MHz any ideas what else i can try?? greetz joerg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8dlenSPOsGF+KA+MRAi2dAJ9PmmhKEAAowh40EaAJsLxiqBlQcgCdGY8g zAySWCR14mBj6tQy6xNS7Lk= =Ryxo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Dear Speex developers I am going to port Speex on LPC2368 I tested Speex encoding and the mesurments shows ~40ms cpu time for one frame Do you know who ported speex to NXP or other 32bit platform? Best Regards Zohar fox -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20081105/8261e962/attachment.htm

Hi- I have an upcoming application that requires use of PRI channels that are primarily used for high-volume incoming traffic, but that are to be used for outbound calling as well. Of course, one option is to have dedicated outbound channels reserved, but this is an inefficient use of channel resources. Normally PBX's are designed to have the CPE yield to an incoming call if a particular

Hi, we are using Tinc in our Freifunk Network in Oldenburg for internode connections over the internet. So Tinc is running on OpenWrt 10.03 on Dlink Dir-300 Routers. We all have enough internet bandwith (1,6 MB/sec and more) but we only get a maximum speed of ~350KB/sec between two tinc nodes because then tinc uses 99% of the cpu. Is it possible to get more Speed with tinc on this machines?