search for: 180gb

Hi to all We have a maildir with about 180GB of emails. We have to archive them to a structure like: .Archive.YYY./MM.folder Are you aware of a script doing this ? I've found a perl script that doesn't spit in year and month and a very, very, very, very, very old python script that: 1) doesn't manage base64 encoded subject proper...

...f the disks as L2ARC? I have a few questions about this: -Is 10GB enough for a log device? -Can I partition the disks (10GB + 90 GB) and use the unused (90GB) space as L2ARC? -If I use the rest of the disks as L2ARC, do I have to mirror the L2ARC or can I just add 2 partitions (eg: 2 x 90GB = 180GB) -If I used non mirrored L2ARC, Could something go wrong if one L2ARC device failed (pool unavailable,lock in the kernel, panic,...)? -- Michel Jansens

...a Win2000 Server. We've been working kinda hard to get everything upgraded to either RH7.3 or RH8.0 since we rarely get the opportunity. 2 similar servers (one dev, one prod) access this same window share, which has a large number of directories (about 620-650), and the share itself is for a 180GB volume. Just recently we discovered that our dev server (RH6.2/2.2.14-5.0 with samba 2.0.6-9) can see all of the directories/files at the root of this share, but the prod server (RH8.0/2.4.18-19.8.0 with samba 2.2.x -> 2.2.7a-1) can not, it can however see a good portion of them (about 554)....

I have made something for archiving that you can supply with an array of mail folders and it wil move messages of a specific year to a folder ARCHIVE/YEAR. If you only have 180GB I would not make subdivision in months. Just put everything in a year folder sent and and received combined. Also use doveadm in your script, that wil work on any type of storage and you do not want to risk loosing email, because someone is not 'coding' properly. -----Original Messag...

On 13 Feb 2019, at 02:22, Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > Hi to all > We have a maildir with about 180GB of emails. > We have to archive them to a structure like: .Archive.YYY./MM.folder > > Are you aware of a script doing this ? I've found a perl script that > doesn't spit in year and month and a very, very, very, very, very old > python script that: > 1) doesn't manage...

...iv> <br> </div> <div> I have made something for archiving that you can supply with an array of </div> <div> mail folders and it wil move messages of a specific year to a folder </div> <div> ARCHIVE/YEAR. If you only have 180GB I would not make subdivision in </div> <div> months. Just put everything in a year folder sent and and received </div> <div> combined. </div> <div> Also use doveadm in your script, that wil work on any type of storage </div>...

...d of device md0: rw=0, want=28987566088, limit=4595422208 attempt to access beyond end of device md0: rw=0, want=28987566088, limit=4595422208 Needless to say it's not giving me that warm fuzzy feeling. The one caveat is that not all the members of my array were the same size -- one disk is 180GB while all the rest are 160GB. I'm going to test overnight with identically sized RAID members, but I also wanted to see if anyone else is using RAID6. Thanks. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University

...at I would expect - that is, around 500MB/sec sustained reads and writes. Obviously I can't just use iozone to test an equivalent OCFS filesystem on the same LUNs, since OCFS only supports the various Oracle data files. So, I've loaded one of our larger databases onto the array, perhaps 180GB. However, when I start an I/O intensive internal Oracle operation (partition swap, in this case, which does full table scans and then rewrites that same data back to disk), I only see writes of 2-6MB/sec, per node, for maybe 15 - 40 MB/sec aggregate throughput. The nodes are mostly idle during th...

I have a 1.5TB disk that has several partitions. One of them is 900GB. Now I can only see 300GB. Where is the rest? Is there a command I can do to reach the rest of the data? Will scrub help? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...a Win2000 Server. We've been working kinda hard to get everything upgraded to either RH7.3 or RH8.0 since we rarely get the opportunity. 2 similar servers (one dev, one prod) access this same window share, which has a large number of directories (about 620-650), and the share itself is for a 180GB volume. Just recently we discovered that our dev server (RH6.2/2.2.14-5.0 with samba 2.0.6-9) can see all of the directories/files at the root of this share, but the prod server (RH8.0/2.4.18-19.8.0 with samba 2.2.x -> 2.2.7a-1) can not, it can however see a good portion of them (about 554)....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Howdy - we have a bunch of dual processor Compaqs with 180GB RAID partitions for email, running with ext2 for the last year or so. I thought I'd try out ext3 (on our development machine :-) to see whether it was a practical proposition for this kind of thing yet. Appears to be working so far, with a 300MB journal (based on the rule of thumb in the ext...

...needed 82 seconds using drag/drop on W2K. NFS needed 39 seconds. I have read the 'performance tuning' documents and have done all/most of the changes they recommend but nothing appears to increase the speed. We are running Solaris 8 with Samba V2.2.7. Server has 2GB RAM and (6) mirrored 180GB drives. Does anyone know of any other tuning or what might be happening? Thanks for any help. Graeme Walker System Administrator Exco Engineering [global] workgroup = EXCOENG netbios name = MARS netbios aliases = PHOBOS security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords...

Hey All, I've been using rsync (2.6.9) to migrate a 90g message store volume and I'm running into some interesting results. I have two FC storage arrays attached to a Sunfire V280R, running Solaris 8. My 100gig volume is on a Sun StoreEdge 3510, and my new 500gig partition is on an HP EVA. I used the syntax: rsync -a --stats --delete $SRC/$dir/ $DST/$dir At present time, the

...ilesystem: xfs (barrier off) Clinet ----------------------- Windows 2008 Server R2 64bit Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter Test tool: Iometer Iometer configuration: Normal I/O test policy, 1MB sequential read/write Every Iometer test run by 3 minutes, Iometer test file size is 180GB. Server and client are connected directly with fabric links, without any 10GbE switches. I use Iometer to test normal file read/write performance, at first, SMB2 is not enabled,test 1MB sequential read/write performance with SMB1, I got 610 MB/s write performance which is really good, while read...

If I''m gonna use OpenSolaris, I will have to buy new hardware, which I can''t really defend at the moment. But I may be able to defend it in the near future if using redundancy on ZDF uses less disk space as simply getting extra drives and do identical copies, with periodic CRC checks of the source material to check the health. Or will I use as much drive space with redundancy?

...GB), run=300001-300009msec Disk stats (read/write): vda: ios=29/39459261, merge=0/0, ticks=0/1570580, in_queue=35745992, util=100.00% With the patches ---------------- Read test: Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=572MiB/s (600MB/s), 35.0MiB/s-37.2MiB/s (36.7MB/s-38.0MB/s), io=168GiB (180GB), run=300001-300006msec Disk stats (read/write): vda: ios=43917611/0, merge=0/0, ticks=1934268/0, in_queue=35531688, util=100.00% Write test: Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=546MiB/s (572MB/s), 33.7MiB/s-35.0MiB/s (35.3MB/s-36.7MB/s), io=160GiB (172GB), run=300001-300007msec Disk...

...GB), run=300001-300009msec Disk stats (read/write): vda: ios=29/39459261, merge=0/0, ticks=0/1570580, in_queue=35745992, util=100.00% With the patches ---------------- Read test: Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=572MiB/s (600MB/s), 35.0MiB/s-37.2MiB/s (36.7MB/s-38.0MB/s), io=168GiB (180GB), run=300001-300006msec Disk stats (read/write): vda: ios=43917611/0, merge=0/0, ticks=1934268/0, in_queue=35531688, util=100.00% Write test: Run status group 0 (all jobs): WRITE: bw=546MiB/s (572MB/s), 33.7MiB/s-35.0MiB/s (35.3MB/s-36.7MB/s), io=160GiB (172GB), run=300001-300007msec Disk...

On 07/20/2018 06:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:29:37AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This patch series is the follow up on the discussions we had before about >> the RFC titled [RFC,V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation >> for virito devices (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10417371/). There >> were suggestions

On 07/20/2018 06:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:29:37AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This patch series is the follow up on the discussions we had before about >> the RFC titled [RFC,V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation >> for virito devices (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10417371/). There >> were suggestions