search for: 17gb

.../eva_mpio_myserver07_08_oracle_bkup0 /data/orabackup ocfs2 _netdev,nointr,defaults 0 0 We have a RMAN retention policy of 3 days so backups older than that do get deleted. As a test I did a df & du of this filesystem and then deleted (via RMAN) the oldest backup, this file was 17Gb in size, after which I again did a du & df. These both reported that 17Gb had been released to the filesystem. What I still don't get is why df reports that the Used space is at 198Gb - that seems an awful waste Any insight into this major discrepancy would be much appreciated....

Hi, I was backup up my laptop the other day, and the Windows backup utility said it was going to do about 17GB of data - and I was dumping this to a Samba share from my Linux machine. However, it looks like the data wrapped around when it got past 4GB. Not really sure what happened though. When I saw that the .bkf file was smaller (the next morning) that what a previous 'ls -l' showed (the night...

Hi, I tried performing a complete copy of 17GB of filesystems over the WAN (0.8GB/hr) with the speed of 16Mbps. The filesystem consists of several large g-zipped files. These large g-zipped files have actually been zipped out of other sub-filesystems and directories. I noticed that while transferring a lists of large g-zipped files, rsync tends...

...u're not using hugepages. Or you've just posted wrong XML? Then again, kernel's approach to hugepages is not as awesome as to regular system pages. Either on boot (1GB) or at runtime (2MB) one must cut a slice of memory off to be used by hugepages and nothing else. So even if you have ~17GB RAM free on both nodes, they are reserved for hugepages, hence the OOM. Michal

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5299 Summary: 2.6.9 client cannot receive files from 3.0.0 server Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hi all. I have a 50 GB OCFS2 file system. I'm currently using ~26GB of space but df is reporting 43 GB used. Any ideas how to find out where the missing 17GB is at? The file system was formatted with a 16K cluster & 4K block size. Thanks, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20060920/a1dbbe3c/attachment.html

...l bytes received: 5017339 sent 68 bytes received 5017339 bytes 56060.41 bytes/sec total size is 6716087965 speedup is 1338.56 lion:/homes/ ========= Tue Aug 22 12:14:58 CEST 2006 ================== 233780 files/89 sec = 2626 files/sec On the large filesystems with ~1.200.000 files/17GB, rsync takes 30 minutes, even when only few files change (and even when invoked with -n): lion:/homes/ ========= Tue Aug 22 12:14:58 CEST 2006 ================== receiving file list ... done --<snip-snip>-- Number of files: 1232323 Number of files transferred: 124 Total...

NFS server (b39): bash-3.00# zfs get quota nfs-s5-s8/d5201 nfs-s5-p0/d5110 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE nfs-s5-p0/d5110 quota 600G local nfs-s5-s8/d5201 quota 600G local bash-3.00# bash-3.00# df -h | egrep "d5201|d5110" nfs-s5-p0/d5110 600G 527G 73G 88% /nfs-s5-p0/d5110

I have a 5.4TB file system, ext4, that currently is reporting problems, however, every time I run fsck.ext4 on the file system, it grows to more than 17GB. Can anyone tell me WTF is going on here? Why is it using so much disk space? -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director HPC Coordinator Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier at sfu.ca Website :...

...properly, if I run 'smbclient -Tc' to create a tarball from such a share, only the first N bytes of a large file in the share get stuffed in the tarball, where N is (I think) the incorrectly reported size, e.g., reported in the first example. The large file I'm dealing with is about a 17GB Exchange database on a W2K server, but I suspect anything over 2GB will exhibit similar errors. I'm running RH7.3. Can anybody else confirm these errors? Regards, Carey

...Theora] Encoding: theora legalities Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:51:18 +1000 From: Sime Mardesic <simem@traffic.redflex.com.au> To: <theora@xiph.org> Hi, I am having trouble understanding the legalities of the whole encoding issue. Here is what I am trying to do: Problem: We get 17GB?s worth of 12 second long mpeg2 video clips from a capture card. We want some way of compressing these clips so that we can save space and bandwidth. These clips are used in an activity that generates income (nothing sinister). Proposed solution: Use some sort of encoder to encode the clips thus s...

...salvage of blocks, etc. Then as sure as day follows night, the space is back to normal. At some point I retired two disks, replacing them with two new ones. Now on the same Compaq box, I am still experiencing the same symptoms. For starters, `mount` does not report the correct disk sizes: da0 is 17GB da1 is 36GB but `df -h` gives following output Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 16G 4.5G 10.0G 31% / /dev/da1s1e 34G 17G 13G 56% /wananchi The output of `mount` is: wash@ns2 ('tty') ~ 129 -> mount /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, lo...

Respected R experts, I am trying to apply a user function that basically calls and applies the R loess function from stat package over each time series. I have a large matrix of size 21 X 9000000 and I need to apply the loess for each column and hence I have implemented this separate user function that applies loess over each column and I am calling this function foo as follows:

Dear Peter, My inbox is MDA_external Storage: 17GB of 24GB Subject / From / To is fast but FTS(Full Text Search) for body is horrible. I suppose this is where we need Apache Solr. Do you think my mail storage format is bad? Do I need to change for better performance? Please advise Kevin On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Peter Hodur <peteho...

...5GB devid 2 size 298.09GB used 142.01GB path /dev/sdc1 devid 1 size 298.09GB used 142.03GB path /dev/sdb1 The send fs is on a dm-crypt device and the receive on a btrfs raid1 A scrub for both fs ran fine without errors.I can however send/receive my root fs which is much smaller (~17GB). The error occurs also if i just use "btrfs send" and pipe the output to a file. It takes a very long time before my system crashes (several hours) so i wasn''t able to monitor when exactly the fd''s increase. In the beginning "btrfs send" just opens less tha...

...and working. During a large mail import with 2.0.16 today, I ran across a worrying message in the logs during an fts_squat reindex: out of memory. The plugin doesn't obey the mmap_disable configuration directive, which I've confirmed in the plugin source. The mailbox in question has only 17GB (mdbox style), with about 90,000 emails in it. Its "index" (for the purposes of normal IMAP retrieval as opposed to IMAP TEXT/BODY searching) is fine and uncorrupted. I freshly import these mailboxes between test iterations and any version changes anyway, so if there's corruption, it...

...available in both QCOW2, VHD, and VMDK format. The image download size is approximately 135 MB, which decompress to a 20GB sparse image. The partition layout is: - 512k - freebsd-boot GPT partition type (bootfs GPT label) - 1GB - freebsd-swap GPT partition type (swapfs GPT label) - ~17GB - freebsd-ufs GPT partition type (rootfs GPT label) Changes between -BETA4 and -RC1 include: - Fix to a regression in bsdinstall(8) that prevents ZFS on GELI installation from working correctly.[*] *Please note: a last-minute problem was found in 10.0-RC1 testing with this inst...

> * Kevin Laurie <superinterstellar at gmail.com> 2015.01.24 19:41: > > > Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed > how > > much faster are we looking at? > > With a current version of Dovecot a search is pretty fast _without_ using > external indexes. I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 > messages in it,

...s are available in both QCOW2 and VMDK format. The image download size is approximately 136 MB, which decompress to a 20GB sparse image. The partition layout is: - 512k - freebsd-boot GPT partition type (bootfs GPT label) - 1GB - freebsd-swap GPT partition type (swapfs GPT label) - ~17GB - freebsd-ufs GPT partition type (rootfs GPT label) ISO Checksums: amd64: SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-BETA3-amd64-bootonly.iso) = 2fd1c59c94f0e30a8a23cf5a8b2b6caa565e45fc2c97dd5d831d38bf60db47e8 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-BETA3-amd64-disc1.iso) = ffae9adf91e6030e0f83fecb4fe1a1cc3e8478efddbd0e2cfa5457...

On 09.02.2015 18:19, G. Richard Bellamy wrote: > First I'll quickly summarize my understanding of how to configure numa... > > In "//memoryBacking/hugepages/page[@nodeset]" I am telling libvirt to > use hugepages for the guest, and to get those hugepages from a > particular host NUMA node. No, @nodeset refers to guest NUMA nodes. > > In