search for: 1739

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1739 Summary: getcwd does not support size zero argument on Solaris Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd...

...logging this error: domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. At this point, authentications no longer work. "wbinfo -p" fails. If I run it with debug logging, winbindd only logs these messages every 5 minutes post-failure: [2016/04/25 15:47:10.676347, 10, pid=1739, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=winbind] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_cm.c:385(winbind_msg_domain_online) Domain ad is marked as online now. [2016/04/25 15:47:10.682186, 11, pid=1739, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=winbind] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:4597(unpack_tdc_domains) u...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1739 Bug ID: 1739 Summary: meta mark 0x80000000 display error Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee...

...] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/GWCISCO5400O-600bfcc8] << [ TYPE: Control (4) SUBCLASS: T38/Negotiation Requested (19) ] [SIP/GWCISCO5400O-600bfcc8] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/GWCISCO5400O-600bfcc8] [Jul 16 17:50:39] NOTICE[2736]: rtp.c:1739 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec 96 received from '192.168.3.163' << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/GWCISCO5400O-600bfcc8] [Jul 16 17:50:40] NOTICE[2736]: rtp.c:1739 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec 96 received from '192.168.3.163' << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5...

...ms/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `synchronize'' /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /System/Libr...

On Tue, 7 Jul 1998 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > > I've recently installed Version 1.9.18p8 on a V2.6 Solaris x86 box. > This system has an 8GB disk that I'm sharing out using Samba. > After I map this share to a drive letter on my V4 NTWS, the > properties for this drive reports that it is only 4GB. > > Is this a known "bug"? > Other than the bogus

...,V4,V5)) > names(f)<-c("date","open","high","low","close") > f$test <-0 > f$test <- ifelse(f$close<Lag(f$low),1,ifelse(f$close>Lag(f$high),-1,Lag(f$test))) > f date open high low close Lag.1 1 19830216 1737 1742 1735 1739 NA 2 19830217 1738 1745 1738 1742 0 3 19830218 1740 1744 1738 1739 0 4 19830221 1730 1730 1721 1721 1 5 19830222 1715 1720 1714 1720 1 6 19830223 1711 1712 1702 1709 1 7 19830224 1708 1716 1708 1716 -1 8 19830225 1718 1726 1718 1718 -1 9 19830228 1712 1713 1701 1704 1 10 19830301 1690 1694...

...ects/mrblog Ulf$ rake db:schema:load --trace (in /Users/Ulf/Projects/mrblog) rake aborted! Don''t know how to build task ''db:schema:load'' /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1472:in `[]'' /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1761:in `standard_exception_handling''...

...cute'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:362:in `invoke'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/thread.rb:135:in `synchronize'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1761:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr...

...lib/ rake.rb:362:in `invoke'' C:/usr/local/bin/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/ rake.rb:355:in `synchronize'' C:/usr/local/bin/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/ rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' C:/usr/local/bin/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/ rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' C:/usr/local/bin/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/ rake.rb:1739:in `each'' C:/usr/local/bin/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/ rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' C:/usr/local/bin/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/ rake.rb:1761:in `standa...

Hi, I''ve just started to try and spec my application.html.erb layout as one of the view specs but it totally barfs. I''m guessing that it''s due to the yield statements in the layout. Any clues as to how to proceed? Cheers Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

.../lib/rake.rb:392:in `execute'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:362:in `invoke'' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/thread.rb:135:in `synchronize'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1761:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8...

...39; c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:362:in `invoke'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `synchronize'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1761:in `standard_exception_handling'' c:/ruby/lib/r...

I''m getting some really really really odd testing behavior. 1. Running rake test:units passes with flying colors. (Well, that''s not what I mean by weird, but I suppose it is ;) ) 2. Running rake test:functionals yields something like ..........................E..............EEEEE.......EEEE...rake aborted! But doesn''t print any stack traces or error message output

...al/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:362:in `invoke'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `synchronize'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1761:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr...

...sites'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:361:in `invoke'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `synchronize'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:355:in `invoke'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `each'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1739:in `top_level'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake.rb:1761:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8...

hello all, i'm forwarding this question for a colleague. "Is it possible to open a 2nd R Console?" regards, mark+ -- mark garey ucsf department of epidemiology and biostatistics division of biostatistics 185 berry street, suite 5700 san francisco, ca. 94107-1739 415.514.8147

could anyone help explaining what does this error mean? i get this error when make a video/ audio call from X-lite to Bria prof. phone rtp.c:1739 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec 126 received from '10.0.0.26' Gres -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090714/5699a835/attachment.htm

...sion in R. Thanks. -- Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146 185 Berry St #5700 ross at biostat.ucsf.edu Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics fax: (415) 514-8150 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94107-1739 hm: (415) 550-1062

Hi there, I''ve been working with RSpec for about a week now, and the process of moving from a Test::Unit + Mocha setup to an RSpec + Mocha environment has been pretty straightforward. Except, I''m having problems with using template.expect_render. I have Mocha enabled with: > config.mock_with :mocha in spec_helper. And then I have a view spec which looks like this: