search for: 1700mb

...uest ~1280MB/s ~1350MB/s In this case, max send pkt size is still limited to 4K, so Host->Guest performance will worse than before. After performance increase the max send pkt size to 64K: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1500MB/s ~2440MB/s After performance all patches are used: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s &gt...

...uest ~1280MB/s ~1350MB/s In this case, max send pkt size is still limited to 4K, so Host->Guest performance will worse than before. After performance increase the max send pkt size to 64K: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1500MB/s ~2440MB/s After performance all patches are used: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s &gt...

...ore performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest memory will not be wasted. --- Yiwen Jiang (5): VSOCK: support fill mergeable rx buffer in guest VSOCK: support fill data to mergeable rx...

...ore performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest memory will not be wasted. --- Yiwen Jiang (5): VSOCK: support fill mergeable rx buffer in guest VSOCK: support fill data to mergeable rx...

...Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s >> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >> >> After performance: >> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >> >> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >> memory will not be wasted. > > > Hi: > > Thanks for the patches and the numbers are really im...

...Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s >> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >> >> After performance: >> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >> >> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >> memory will not be wasted. > > > Hi: > > Thanks for the patches and the numbers are really im...

...the same as before. So in the mergeable mode, the performance may be worse in ((4k - hdr), 4k] than before. Thanks, Yiwen. >> After performance increase the max send pkt size to 64K: >> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >> Host->Guest ~1500MB/s ~2440MB/s >> >> After performance all patches are used: >> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >> Hos...

...; Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s >>>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >>>> >>>> After performance: >>>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >>>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>> >>>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >>>> memory will not be wasted. >>> Hi: >>> >>> Thanks f...

...; Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s >>>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >>>> >>>> After performance: >>>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >>>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>> >>>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >>>> memory will not be wasted. >>> Hi: >>> >>> Thanks f...

...worse than before. It's concerning though, what if application sends small packets? What is the source of the slowdown? Do you know? > After performance increase the max send pkt size to 64K: > Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > Host->Guest ~1500MB/s ~2440MB/s > > After performance all patches are used: > Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > Host->Guest ~1700MB/s...

...~480MB/s >>>>>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >>>>>> >>>>>> After performance: >>>>>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >>>>>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>>>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>>>> >>>>>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >>>>>> memory will not be wasted. >>>>&g...

...~480MB/s >>>>>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >>>>>> >>>>>> After performance: >>>>>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >>>>>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>>>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>>>> >>>>>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >>>>>> memory will not be wasted. >>>>&g...

...Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s > Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s > > After performance: > Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > > >From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest > memory will not be wasted. Oh I didn't see that one. Pls CC me in the future. Looking at it I agree zero page allocat...

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:10:58AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/11/30 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>>> If you want to compare it with

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:10:58AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/11/30 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>>> If you want to compare it with

...Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s > Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s > > After performance: > Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > > From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest > memory will not be wasted. Hi: Thanks for the patches and the numbers are really impressive. But instead of duplicating cod...

...ndwidth) >>> Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s >>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >>> >>> After performance: >>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>> >>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >>> memory will not be wasted. >> Hi: >> >> Thanks for the patches and the numbe...

...ore performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~400MB/s ~480MB/s Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s After performance: Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest memory will not be wasted. In addition, multiqueue feature I have not implemented it yet. Thanks, Yiwen.

...00MB/s ~480MB/s >>>>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s >>>>> >>>>> After performance: >>>>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) >>>>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s >>>>> >>>>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest >>>>> memory will not be wasted. >>>> Hi: >>>&...

...>>>> Host->Guest ~1450MB/s ~1600MB/s > >>>>>> > >>>>>> After performance: > >>>>>> Single socket Multiple sockets(Max Bandwidth) > >>>>>> Guest->Host ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > >>>>>> Host->Guest ~1700MB/s ~2900MB/s > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From the test results, the performance is improved obviously, and guest > >>>>>> memory will not be wasted...