search for: 17.82

Hola compañeros de la lista, qué tal. Estoy haciendo un análisis de componentes principales utilizando las funciones "dudi.pca" (paquete "ade4") y "PCA" (paquete "FactoMineR"). Sucede que al comparar las coordenadas de cada individuo que obtiene cada función, las que corresponden al segundo componente principal tienen idéntica magnitud pero con

Hi, I'm trying to turn on a flag (-inline-generic-switch-cost) introduced in r301649 which improved the inline cost heuristic for switch. In my experiment for LLVM test suite and spec2000/2006 in AArch64, +17.82% performance and -8% code size reduce was observed in spec2000/vertex with O3 LTO. No significant code size / performance regression was found in O3/O2/Os. Before we turn this

Instalo ade4 correctamente y no me abren los datos como por ejemplo data(bsetal97) ¿Qué piensan de eso? De: r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org [mailto:r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org] En nombre de Francesc Carmona Enviado el: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 7:30 AM Para: r-help-es en r-project.org Asunto: Re: [R-es] Análisis de componentes principales con ade4 y FactoMineR Por definición

Hi everyone, I've run into a bit of strange problem with implicit vs explicit printing and the call stack. I've included an example at the bottom of this email. The basic problem is that I have an S3 object with a print method. When the object is implicitly printed (ie. typed directly into the console) the function arguments in the call stack are exploded out to their actual values,

R-help, I'm using the "update" command for a multiple regression model and it is just not working: > update(model1, . ~ . – temp:wind:rad,data=ozone.pollution) Error: unexpected input in "model2<-update(model1, . ~ . –" > summary(model1) Call: lm(formula = ozone ~ temp * wind * rad + I(rad^2) + I(temp^2) + I(wind^2), data = ozone.pollution) Residuals:

I am using the randomForest package. I have found that multiple runs of precisely the same command can generate drastically different run times. Can anyone with knowledge of this package provide some insight as to why this would happen and whether there's anything I can do about it? Here are some details of what I'm doing: - Data: ~80,000 rows, with 10 columns (one of which is the

Por definición la primera componente principal es una combinación lineal que maximiza la varianza de modo que si la componente 1 es el vector de coeficientes a, entonces, el vector -a también puede ser dicha componente. Las otras componentes, por ejemplo la segunda, es incorrelacionada con la primera y también maximiza la varianza, luego el signo no importa. Así pues, el signo de cada

Dear Sirs, I am Professor at Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. While taking classes, I found the *by() *function producing following error when I use FUN=mean or median and some other functions, however, FUN=summary works. Given below is the output of the example I used on a built-in dataset "mtcars", along with error message reproduced herewith: >

Efectivamente. Puedes cambiar el signo de todos los valores de la segunda componente, por ejemplo al hacer un gráfico de dispersión. No creo que se pueda hacer directamente en la función. Saludos Francesc El 01/10/13 17:53, Argel Gastélum Arellánez ha escrit: > Hola Francesc, muchas gracias por tu respuesta. > > Entonces, si quisiera que las gráficas de los resultados de

I think you are not using the best function for what your intentions are. Try: > by(data=mtcars, INDICES=list(as.factor(mtcars$am)), FUN=colMeans) : 0 mpg cyl disp hp drat wt qsec vs 17.1473684 6.9473684 290.3789474 160.2631579 3.2863158 3.7688947 18.1831579 0.3684211 am gear carb 0.0000000

Hello, Using the following lines of code, I created the following graph:

Hello, Using the following lines of code, I created the following graph:

Dear All, Thanks for your help. However, I would like to draw your attention to the following: Actually, I was replicating the Example 2.3, using the dataset "brainsize.txt" given in Section 2.3.3 ("Summarize by group") at page 55, of a famous book "R by Example" written by "Jim Albert and Maria Rizzo" published in Springers (2012) in a Use R! Series. The

Dear r-helpers, I have a graph created using the library 'spatgraphs'. library(spatstat) library(spatgraphs) xy <- rbind(c(28.39, -16.27), c(30.62, -20.13), c(32.25, -28.7), c(22.43, -27.22), c(27.5, -21.17), c(31.22, -24.52), c(17.93, -26.92), c(18.72, -17.95), c(24.15, -17.82), c(29.23, -22.85)) ow <- owin(xrange=range(xy[,1]), yrange=range(xy[,2])) pp <-

I have Data like this: Tone OQtil4 OQ0 GOtil4 GO0 SKrhsJ SK0 RCrhsJ RC0 1 HsLG -9.1347877 -2.97 -7.409590 -6.40 9.389357 20.60 10.688854 24.40 2 HsLG -7.9270569 -2.03 -7.861541 -6.90 10.165324 26.40 10.640183 23.10 3 HsLG -7.0394106 -1.26 -7.509566 -6.53 12.033194 30.87 9.401959 20.37 4 HsLG -6.8625610 -1.03 -7.645118 -6.68 10.372605 24.22 9.378803 17.82 5

Hi, I am about to conduct an experiment of temperature dependent development of an insect. Here I would like to know is if I could be able to find the parameters of the models what I will use in data analysis with R program. I have found some other softwares that can be used for parameter estimation but liscence would be needed, not open source. So I prefer to use R langauge if it is reliable

Dear List, i am trying to produce a 3d plot using wireframe using the code: wireframe(Residuals_FD ~ Elevation * Temperature, data = data2, scales = list(arrows = FALSE), drape = TRUE, colorkey = TRUE) As you can see when the code (using the data below) is run the plot area is set-up correctly but the actual surface is missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Chris #data Elevation

In a multiple linear regression with two independent variables is there any function in R to test for the coefficients being different than some given values? Example: x1<-rnorm(100) x2<-rnorm(100) y<-3+0.6*x1+0.3*x2 lm(y~x1+x2) Obtain a test for the coefficients for x1 being different than 0.6 and for x2 different than 0.3 Thanks Manuel

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:14 , Tomas Florian <tflorian@telus.net> sent: >Hello, > >I''m having trouble with slow IO performance under Xen 2.0.7 with 2.6 >kernel. I''m running 3 physical machine. I did hdparm -tT in my Dom0 on >both servers and this is what I get: <snip> I would check to make sure your kernels have the right ide drivers builtin or as

> On Apr 15, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Akhilesh Singh <akhileshsingh.igkv at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear All, > > Thanks for your help. However, I would like to draw your attention to the > following: > > Actually, I was replicating the Example 2.3, using the dataset > "brainsize.txt" given in Section 2.3.3 ("Summarize by group") at page 55, > of a