search for: 16d

...r me so next is what i understood: ********** SIMPLE REGISTER COALESCING ********** ********** Function: foo ********** JOINING INTERVALS *********** entry: 16L %vreg0<def> = COPY %R25R24<kill>; DREGS:%vreg0 Considering merging %vreg0 with physreg %R25R24 RHS = %vreg0 = [16d,96d:0) 0 at 16d LHS = %R25R24,inf = [0L,16d:0) 0 at 0L-phidef updated: 96L %vreg8<def> = COPY %R25R24<kill>; PTRREGS:%vreg8 updated: 32L %vreg5<def> = COPY %R25R24; PTRREGS:%vreg5 Joined. Result = %R25R24,inf = [0L,96d:0) 0 at 0L-phidef 32L...

...> ********** SIMPLE REGISTER COALESCING ********** > ********** Function: foo > ********** JOINING INTERVALS *********** > entry: > 16L %vreg0<def> = COPY %R25R24<kill>; DREGS:%vreg0 > Considering merging %vreg0 with physreg %R25R24 > RHS = %vreg0 = [16d,96d:0) 0 at 16d > LHS = %R25R24,inf = [0L,16d:0) 0 at 0L-phidef > updated: 96L %vreg8<def> = COPY %R25R24<kill>; PTRREGS:%vreg8 > updated: 32L %vreg5<def> = COPY %R25R24; PTRREGS:%vreg5 > Joined. Result = %R25R24,inf = [0L,96d:0) 0...

On Mar 26, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > Hello Jakob, thanks for the reply. The three regclasses involved here are all subsets from each other and aren't disjoint. These are the basic descriptions of the regclasses involved to show what i mean: > > DREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R1R0 (16 regs) > DLDREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R17R16 (8 regs) > PTRREGS:

Hello Jakob, thanks for the reply. The three regclasses involved here are all subsets from each other and aren't disjoint. These are the basic descriptions of the regclasses involved to show what i mean: DREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R1R0 (16 regs) DLDREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R17R16 (8 regs) PTRREGS: R31R30, R29R28, R27R26 (3 regs) All classes intersect each other

...nstruction, for the life of the instruction like I would expect. The verifier does not like it however: $ llc -mtriple=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -mcpu=gfx906 -verify-machineinstrs -run-pass=machine-scheduler -o - -verify-misched foo.mir # Before machine scheduling. ********** INTERVALS ********** %0 [16r,16d:1)[32r,32d:0) 0 at 32r 1 at 16r weight:0.000000e+00 RegMasks: ********** MACHINEINSTRS ********** # Machine code for function multiple_connected_components_dead: NoPHIs, TracksLiveness 0B bb.0: 16B dead %0:vgpr_32 = V_MOV_B32_e32 0, implicit $exec 32B dead %0:vgpr_32 =...

I was just about to replace 2 Merlin Legend systems (one in my house and one in my Parent's house) with * systems. I have 2 beefy linux systems ready to go and have enough Cisco 7960 and 7970 phones to replace all my MLX-10D, MLX-16D and MLX-20 phones. Then I discovered that * seems to be lacking a critical feature for replacing a legend (or any standard PBX) and that is an ability for a user to see if another user is on his or her phone or if a trunk is in use. I am not sure if this is where I should address this issue (or...

...nstruction, for the life of the instruction like I would expect. The verifier does not like it however: $ llc -mtriple=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -mcpu=gfx906 -verify-machineinstrs -run-pass=machine-scheduler -o - -verify-misched foo.mir # Before machine scheduling. ********** INTERVALS ********** %0 [16r,16d:1)[32r,32d:0) 0 at 32r 1 at 16r weight:0.000000e+00 RegMasks: ********** MACHINEINSTRS ********** # Machine code for function multiple_connected_components_dead: NoPHIs, TracksLiveness 0B bb.0: 16B dead %0:vgpr_32 = V_MOV_B32_e32 0, implicit $exec 32B dead %0:vgpr_32 =...

...than 'chcp 850' on the Windows machine. This doesn't seem to alleviate the problem when the Windows box is the server... Is it a matter of forcing cp850 at a much earlier state (running just chcp gives '437')? Any takers? :) -- ### Martin Moeller Liga LinDist ApS. Faelledvej 16D DK-2200 Copenhagen N Tel: +45 35 36 95 05 Fax: +45 35 36 92 05 http://www.liga.dk mailto: martin@liga.dk

Hi, I'm am currently in the process of trying to integrate an * box with an NEC Electra Elite IPK. Currently, we have 7 POTS lines coming into our building. These lines are plugged into our NEC using the appropriate analog line interface card from NEC. The NEC effectively has NO configuration done to it, other than to make all the internal phones ring when a call comes in. We also

...0 PhysBasePtr: 0x0 LinBytesPerScanLine: 0 BnkNumberOfImagePages: 0 LinNumberOfImagePages: 0 LinRedMaskSize: 0 LinRedFieldPosition: 0 LinGreenMaskSize: 0 LinGreenFieldPosition: 0 LinBlueMaskSize: 0 LinBlueFieldPosition: 0 LinRsvdMaskSize: 0 LinRsvdFieldPosition: 0 MaxPixelClock: 0 Mode: 16d (0x0) ModeAttributes: 0x0 WinAAttributes: 0x0 WinBAttributes: 0x0 WinGranularity: 0 WinSize: 0 WinASegment: 0x0 WinBSegment: 0x0 WinFuncPtr: 0x0 BytesPerScanline: 0 XResolution: 0 YResolution: 0 XCharSize: 0 YCharSize: 0 NumberOfPlanes: 0 BitsPerPixel: 0 NumberOfBanks: 0 MemoryMode...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking