search for: 16778

I've searched the archive for this mailing list and the bug list for OpenSSH for this, and I'm finding nothing. I'd appreciate it if somoene could point me to an existing thread about this. (I know that other people are aware of the problem, though, so I'm a bit surprised to find nothing.) We're running OpenSSH under Solaris 10 using SMF instead of a legacy init script. SMF

...07:35, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092) PANIC: failed to set gid This only happens with the netlogon share ! If I mount any other share, it works fine. Also this problem only occurs with certain user accounts. No problems with: uid=500(werner) gid=500(werner) groups=500(werner) Problem with: uid=16778(u0023628) gid=50000954(LUDIT) groups=50000954(LUDIT) Any ideas, Werner

...-p 16777 Process 16777 attached select(4, [3], [], [3], {38, 210908}^CProcess 16777 detached <detached ...> citadel:/home/archon810 # strace -p 16776 Process 16776 attached select(6, [5], [4], [5], {48, 295874}^CProcess 16776 detached <detached ...> citadel:/home/archon810 # strace -p 16778 Process 16778 attached select(1, [0], [], [0], {60, 0}) = 1 (in [0], left {59, 999996}) read(0, "\0\200\0\0\4\200\0\7\3508\343\204\207\255\4\212y\230&&\372\30*\322\f\325v\335\230 \16v"..., 32768) = 32768 select(1, [0], [], [0], {60, 0}) = 1 (in [0], left {59, 999998}...

Im using the acts_as_taggable plugin, is there a way to paginate the find_tagged_with results? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...p1.dyn1.pitux.com", ...}) = 0 [pid 24795] brk(0) = 0x823e000 [pid 24795] access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) [pid 24795] open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 4 [pid 24795] fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=16778, ...}) = 0 [pid 24795] old_mmap(NULL, 16778, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 4, 0) = 0xb7f37000 [pid 24795] close(4) = 0 [pid 24795] open("/lib/libpam.so.0", O_RDONLY) = 4 [pid 24795] read(4, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\340\24"..., 512) = 512 [pi...

...6474, 16477, 16484, 16490, 16501, 16508, 16514, 16520, 16529, 16533, 16539, 16550, 16556, 16564, 16566, 16578, 16582, 16593, 16599, 16604, 16613, 16620, 16623, 16635, 16636, 16654, 16660, 16666, 16673, 16681, 16688, 16693, 16702, 16706, 16714, 16721, 16728, 16734, 16745, 16749, 16757, 16764, 16769, 16778, 16785, 16792, 16805, 16812, 16819, 16830, 16832, 16839, 16846, 16856, 16862, 16867, 16877, 16884, 16890, 16898, 16904, 16912, 16917, 16923, 16936, 16938, 16953, 16960, 16966, 16973, 16980), class = "Date"), year = c(2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 20...

...16490, 16501, 16508, 16514, 16520, 16529, 16533, 16539, 16550, > 16556, 16564, 16566, 16578, 16582, 16593, 16599, 16604, 16613, > 16620, 16623, 16635, 16636, 16654, 16660, 16666, 16673, 16681, > 16688, 16693, 16702, 16706, 16714, 16721, 16728, 16734, 16745, > 16749, 16757, 16764, 16769, 16778, 16785, 16792, 16805, 16812, > 16819, 16830, 16832, 16839, 16846, 16856, 16862, 16867, 16877, > 16884, 16890, 16898, 16904, 16912, 16917, 16923, 16936, 16938, > 16953, 16960, 16966, 16973, 16980), class = "Date"), year = c(2014L, > 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 201...

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...16105 16108 16109 16111 16112 16115 16116 16117 16118 16121 16122 16124 16125 16128 16161 16162 16165 16166 16190 16192 16272 16327 16351 16355 16382 16393 16409 16410 16467 16492 16493 16494 16497 16510 16511 16513 16514 16515 16519 16527 16587 16618 16632 16680 16769 16770 16771 16773 16776 16777 16778 16779 16830 16833 16839 16859 16863 16871 16872 16873 16875 16876 16877 16878 16879 16880 16885 16886 16919 16951 16967 16971 16974 16979 16986 16996 17040 17041 17052 17059 17060 17077 17081 17092 17196 17198 17203 17211 17212 17258 17302 17365 17367 17374 17391 17398 17424 17445 17447 17474 17476...

...16490, 16501, 16508, 16514, 16520, 16529, 16533, 16539, 16550, > 16556, 16564, 16566, 16578, 16582, 16593, 16599, 16604, 16613, 16620, > 16623, 16635, 16636, 16654, 16660, 16666, 16673, 16681, 16688, 16693, > 16702, 16706, 16714, 16721, 16728, 16734, 16745, 16749, 16757, 16764, > 16769, 16778, 16785, 16792, 16805, 16812, 16819, 16830, 16832, 16839, > 16846, 16856, 16862, 16867, 16877, 16884, 16890, 16898, 16904, 16912, > 16917, 16923, 16936, 16938, 16953, 16960, 16966, 16973, 16980), class = > "Date"), year = c(2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, &...

...kernel: xenstore-write[16771]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 0000000000000000 rsp 00007fffe5be5638 error 4 Jul 12 07:26:47 centosxcat2 kernel: xenstore-write[16777]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 0000000000000000 rsp 00007fffec374dc8 error 4 Jul 12 07:26:47 centosxcat2 kernel: xenstore-write[16778]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 0000000000000000 rsp 00007fff585effe8 error 4 Jul 12 07:26:47 centosxcat2 kernel: xenstore-write[16781]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 0000000000000000 rsp 00007fff50ac34b8 error 4 Jul 12 07:26:47 centosxcat2 kernel: xenstore-write[16783]: segfault at 000000000...

Hi again, I'd like to expand on the performance issues and plead for help. Here's one case which shows these odd hiccups: https://i.imgur.com/CXBPjTK.gifv. In this GIF where I switch back and forth between copy operations on 2 servers, I'm copying a 10GB dir full of .apk and image files. On server "hive" I'm copying straight from the main disk to an attached volume

...is sketchy and preliminary, but it's useful for us, and I have plans to improve it: http://wiki.llvm.org/HowTo:_Tell_GDB_about_JITted_code Please review! Thanks, Reid -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gdb-elf-patch.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 16778 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090708/5ebda977/attachment.diff>

Hi, I'm trying to squeeze performance out of gluster on 4 80GB RAM 20-CPU machines where Gluster runs on attached block storage (Linode) in (4 replicate bricks), and so far everything I tried results in sub-optimal performance. There are many files - mostly images, several million - and many operations take minutes, copying multiple files (even if they're small) suddenly freezes up for

Hi. Since the update to libvirt-1.3.2, virsh keeps disconnecting from qemu:///session. Weirdly enough, qemu:///session works fine for root, and qemu:///system works for both the user and the root. With the same configuration(tarball with files from /etc/libvirt attached), libvirt-1.3.1 works without problems. From the virsh debug log(attached): --- grep error virsh.log.1.3.2 2016-03-03

...16490, 16501, 16508, 16514, 16520, 16529, 16533, 16539, 16550, > 16556, 16564, 16566, 16578, 16582, 16593, 16599, 16604, 16613, > 16620, 16623, 16635, 16636, 16654, 16660, 16666, 16673, 16681, > 16688, 16693, 16702, 16706, 16714, 16721, 16728, 16734, 16745, > 16749, 16757, 16764, 16769, 16778, 16785, 16792, 16805, 16812, > 16819, 16830, 16832, 16839, 16846, 16856, 16862, 16867, 16877, > 16884, 16890, 16898, 16904, 16912, 16917, 16923, 16936, 16938, > 16953, 16960, 16966, 16973, 16980), class = "Date"), year = c(2014L, > 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 2014L, 201...

...111 16112 16115 16116 16117 16118 16121 16122 16124 16125 > 16128 16161 16162 16165 16166 16190 16192 16272 16327 16351 16355 16382 > 16393 16409 16410 16467 16492 16493 16494 16497 16510 16511 16513 16514 > 16515 16519 16527 16587 16618 16632 16680 16769 16770 16771 16773 16776 > 16777 16778 16779 16830 16833 16839 16859 16863 16871 16872 16873 16875 > 16876 16877 16878 16879 16880 16885 16886 16919 16951 16967 16971 16974 > 16979 16986 16996 17040 17041 17052 17059 17060 17077 17081 17092 17196 > 17198 17203 17211 17212 17258 17302 17365 17367 17374 17391 17398 17424 > 174...