Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "166mhz".
Did you mean:
66mhz
2001 Aug 05
2
wine build question....
when i go into the kde controll panel... it tells me i have an i686 (its a
686/166MHz machine)
so, my question is... should i be using the i386 build, or the i686 build???
as i have been using the i386 build, and I am having problems with acessing the
windows registry... i have also tried wine on a cel700, with the i386 build,
and i get the same problems... so should i be using t...
2004 May 21
4
G.729a beta codec on old Pentiums
...t; (Annex A/B (floating point) G.729/PCM16 Codec
Translator)
== G.729 Host-ID: **masked**
== Found license '**masked**' providing 2 channels
== Found total of 2 G.729 licenses
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
The machine this is running on is rather old - it's a Pentium MMX (166Mhz
according to Linux, I thought it was a 200Mhz but I'm remote to the machine
at the moment so I can't watch the BIOS boot to see).
This is probably just a shot in the dark, but could this be related to the
F00F bug in the older Pentiums? Has anyone else got the beta g729a codec
running s...
2005 Apr 04
2
Speex split across processors?
I am interested in using Speex in an embedded system built around an
ARM microcontroller. I have seen other posts indicating that Speex
can run in real-time on some iPAQ PDA's, but these are using a
StrongARM 166MHz processor. I'm looking more at the chips from Atmel
(SAM7), Philips (LPC2xxx), and TI (TMS 470), which are ARM7TDMI with
on-chip SRAM and flash, running at speeds of 33 to 60MHz.
166 down to 60 is a big drop, but I'm hoping to gain performance due
to lack of wait states (no external memor...
2005 Oct 25
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
...d just now got FLAC to work.
Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise
happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that it'll
be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if there are any ARM specific
optimizations that can be done. The processor is a 166MHz processor. Do
you think it is ok?
--
Joe Steeve (http://www.joesteeve.org/)
Z500 Development team (http://www.z500series.com/)
Terminus Graphics Studios
http://www.terminus.in/
2003 Jan 16
1
rsync feature request: conditional compression
rsync is optimized to conserve network resources, sometimes at the expense of CPU resources. As
long as CPU's are fast and networks are slow, rsync with compression
does a great job. However, if I run rsync on a slow box (166MHz Ultra SPARC) over a fast network
(100Mb/s), the compression kills the transfer rate. I turned compression off and I should be done
rsyncing my files (60GB) overnight.
I would like to request a feature I call "conditional compression". What this would do would check
the network buffer,...
2002 Apr 07
1
Age of Empires II playing on the internet
...somebody can tell me how the rules must look like.
See below some details about my configuration and Microsoft advice.
Thanks in advance for the help
Rene van Kleef, the Netherlands
****** DETAILS ******
My configuration:
- Cable connection
- Linux box, Pentium 166Mhz + 64MByte + Linux7.2 + Shorewall
and IPTables v1.2.4
- WindowsXP PC in internal Network, IP-address 192.168.1.60
- Eth0 internal network, static IP addressing
- Eth1 cable connection, dhcp
Microsoft is saying the following ports must be open and can be
optionally b...
2005 Apr 04
0
Speex split across processors?
...c
Le lundi 04 avril 2005 ? 08:44 -0700, Paul Fagerburg a ?crit :
> I am interested in using Speex in an embedded system built around an
> ARM microcontroller. I have seen other posts indicating that Speex
> can run in real-time on some iPAQ PDA's, but these are using a
> StrongARM 166MHz processor. I'm looking more at the chips from Atmel
> (SAM7), Philips (LPC2xxx), and TI (TMS 470), which are ARM7TDMI with
> on-chip SRAM and flash, running at speeds of 33 to 60MHz.
>
> 166 down to 60 is a big drop, but I'm hoping to gain performance due
> to lack of wait...
2005 Oct 06
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:14, Josh Coalson wrote:
> but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host
> order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get
> them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like:
>
> FLAC__int32 * LChannel = buffer[0];
> short TempSource = (short)LChannel[LPos];
>
> instead of
>
> LChannel =
2005 Oct 25
0
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
...> Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise
> happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that
> it'll
> be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if there are any ARM
> specific
> optimizations that can be done. The processor is a 166MHz processor.
> Do
> you think it is ok?
we don't have any ARM optimizations yet, just x86 and ppc. but
yes, FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() will give the most bang for the
buck and is the easiest (it's just a multiply-accumulate-shift
loop).
unsigned i, j;
FLAC__int32 sum;
for(...
1998 Jun 26
3
Error while compliling
...is same spot.
Is this a problem with my gcc compiler? which the message seems to
imply.
But I have compiled the kernel several times with no problem.
(Is there a log file somewhere which I can pull out to show you?)
Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Hardware:
Acer Extensa 393T laptop, 166MHz MMX Pentium CPU, 32 MB EDO RAM, 2.1 GB
HDD
3COM 3c589D ether PC card
OS: Slackware Linux 3.4, kernel 2.0.34, gcc 2.7.2.3
1999 Feb 01
1
Benchmark results.
Hi all,
For people who are looking for some objective
numbers to help recommend Samba to their employers (I
know there are some of you on this list :-) you might
want to look at the following couple of articles.
The first one is in Smart Reseller (a USA trade press
magazine) at :
http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,2196106,00.html
titled : "The Best Windows File Server:
1999 Feb 02
2
Benchmark results
Samba digest 1966, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> For people who are looking for some objective
> numbers to help recommend Samba to their employers (I
> know there are some of you on this list :-) you might
> want to look at the following couple of articles.
>
> The first one is in Smart Reseller (a USA trade press
> magazine) at :
>
>
2003 Sep 26
2
outbound IAX calls bog down DSL
Evening,
I've got * asterisk up and running with nufone account for inbound and
outbound calls from the world... everything works quite nicely except that I
noticed last night that when I have a call active from * to nufone, web
surfing on the network slows to a crawl... additionally, I have a VPN tunnel
to another office (using CIPE) and while inter-office (i.e. - SIP to SIP)
calls
2005 Apr 04
2
Speex split across processors?
...2005 ? 08:44 -0700, Paul Fagerburg a ?crit :
> > I am interested in using Speex in an embedded system built around an
> > ARM microcontroller. I have seen other posts indicating that Speex
> > can run in real-time on some iPAQ PDA's, but these are using a
> > StrongARM 166MHz processor. I'm looking more at the chips from Atmel
> > (SAM7), Philips (LPC2xxx), and TI (TMS 470), which are ARM7TDMI with
> > on-chip SRAM and flash, running at speeds of 33 to 60MHz.
> >
> > 166 down to 60 is a big drop, but I'm hoping to gain performance due
&g...
2004 Feb 17
7
max asterisk load
Hi,
We're evaluating asterisk, somebody has measured maximum asterisk load
(simultaneus calls, calls per seconds...)? Are there any stimation?
Thx. Best regards.
.G
2007 Sep 11
13
ZFS but how?
...s
added/upgraded from time to time to expand space. I''d want to store
large files on it, 15mb - 5gb per file, and they''d only need to be
accessible via NFS/FTP and maybe CIFS. The machine I have dedicated for
this job would be a slow (2800+ S754) AMD64 with about 1.5G of slow ram
(166Mhz (DDR333), though I could put in 200Mhz ram if it makes a BIG
difference). The storage pool would look as follows, 2x 160GB,
preferably as mirror or similar for OS +initial storage, IDE. 4x 500GB
on a sil2124 Sata2 PCI/PCI-X controller, and later 4x300GB IDE via
HPT374 PCI controller.
Now I'...
2004 Apr 06
20
Off topic
Hello,
I''m going to be helping a friend setup Shorewall in place of his Cisco
router on his home network. Shorewall will be acting as the router/firewall
gateway for internet access for his home LAN. His connection to the ISP is
via PPPOE. Nothing unfamiliar here to me. It will be a standard 2 interface
setup.
My curiosity was peaked when he said that he is going to be installing