search for: 163k

Is anybody familiar with the recent bristuff packages released ? There is only a 3 hour difference in release time between them and the CHANGES files are the same. Also what's strange RC7 has 163K and RC7a has only 87K. Ideas anyone ? Regards, Ivan

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

Hello, ZFS is behaving strange on a OSOL laptop, your thoughts are welcome. I am running OSOL on my laptop, currently b124 and i found that the performance of ZFS is not optimal in all situations. If i check the how much space the package cache for pkg(1) uses, it takes a bit longer on this host than on comparable machine to which i transferred all the data. user at host:/var/pkg$ time

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

...destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 13627 packets, 4087K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 450 96712 outtos all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 163K packets, 77M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain outtos (1 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 TOS tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0....