Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "16000k".
Did you mean:
16000
2009 Dec 16
1
Regression in wideband encoding quality between b1 and rc1
...oying) feeling of a
>> muffled voice.
>
> 22 kHz is not supported. The encoder will give you a warning about that. You
> can use the resampler to down-sample to 16 Hz.
Yes, I know it is not officially supported, but it used to work quite
well with beta 1 and sounded much better than 16000k
>> This problem does not seem to affect CBR encoding, only VBR. It does
>> not appear to affect 16k files as much either.
>
> I think the VBR code has been tuned a bit. If the problem doesn't occur at
> 16 kHz, then I don't really care.
To be fair, there is a differen...
2009 Dec 15
2
Regression in wideband encoding quality between b1 and rc1
Hello,
To start with, thanks a lot for making such a great voice codec available!
Having recently upgrading to speex rc1, It occurred to us that there
seems to have been a regression in the quality of encoding since
version beta1.
We are compressing some 22khz wave files in wb mode with maximum
quality / complexity in VBR, and the result was really great with
speex beta1. With rc1 (or beta3),